Ethical Egoism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

Improved Essays
Ethical egoism and utilitarianism both find their idea of morality in the same way. Both use the outcomes of their actions as the basis of what is morally correct. However they aren’t exactly the same, in the way they find their principles as to what the outcome should be. Ethical egoists want what is best for number one, themselves. Utilitarians want the greatest good for all people. Ethical egoism makes less sense than utilitarianism as a conduct for life practices.
John needs money to buy medicine for his child; otherwise, his child may suffer due to lack of medical care. The only person John can borrow money from is from a man named David. However, David will not lend money to John unless John solemnly promises to pay David back within
…show more content…
John deliberates as to whether he should make a false promise to David (thereby getting the money to afford medicine for his child) or refrain from making any such false promises. Ethical egoism would assess that helping John’s child would be the correct moral decision. Ethical egoism makes it goal the greatest good for oneself. Ethical egoism is the opposite of altruism, which is acting selflessly to help others. John has a connection to his child, and most likely loves it, therefore his child means more to him than a stranger. Ethical egoists say one should look out for their own self interest. John has many more self interests for helping his child than being honest to a stranger. Johns child may carry on his name, tell his stories, and one day help him when he gets old. John has no reason to care about what happens to David. John would be acting altruistically by helping his son, but ethical egoism does not completely condone altruism. It allows altruism when it benefits one's self. John would only keep the promise if it were in his best interest to do so. Ayn Rand is a philosopher who promotes ethical egoism. She explains that everyone's goal should be happiness,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the critique “Egoism and Altruism,” Louis P. Pojman strongly rejects the idea of Ayn Rand that everyone should have and egoist morality by explaining the “false dilemma” created between egoism and altruism. He explains that her idea of egoism stating that she believes “selfishness is a virtue and altruism is a vice.” He argues that while some egoist traits are morally necessary, such as self-love and self-interest, they should not be brought about or acted upon at the cost of someone else’s happiness. The idea that one ought to “love thy neighbor as yourself” means to treat everyone with the same respect and dignity that you treat yourself with, not to harm a stranger for your own happiness or joy. He argues against Rand’s theory by stating…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Claiming that the benefits of living in a society based on people’s rights and interest is a greater advantage then living without them. Even if you feel you could get away with it, an ethical egoist would claim it is too great a risk and will maintain the sort of society which they will benefit. The problem with this is that an ethical egoist cannot benefit in a world based on people’s rights if everyone also adopts the same way of thinking. How can you benefit from others if they are only out for themselves as well? In my eyes this is a world of chaos and cannot be adopted universally.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ayn Rand is most known for her belief that people shouldn't care about the other people; She refers to this an ethical egoism, she believes that people who rely on others or the government are “ looters” and “moochers”, and at most I kind of agree but in the end I found myself mostly disagreeing with her on her point of view. In my opinion, I Believe it is in human nature to care about the others and that yeah, we should care about ourselves as well, but we need to treat others the way we want to be treated. Ethical egoism is an absurd form of saying one is selfish and they Ayn…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical egoism states that the only moral actions are those that increase one’s well-being. If Michael and Jim were both about to get promoted but only one of them got the desired raise, Michael being an egoist would want to hurt Jim, or even kill him, in order to get that raise. Ethical egoism would justify this action and consider it moral because it increased Michael’s well-being. “Egoism may require for people to do immoral actions” such as murder (Shafer-Landau 107). This is fatal to ethical egoism because immoral actions done in self interest of ethical egoism are still immoral.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson is quick to condemn the Equal Punishment Principle because, for one reason, it does not lead to a “measure of moral desert” (as cited in Timmons, 2016, p. 539). Nathanson also condemns the Equal Punishment Principle because it does not result in a sufficient scale for knowing suitable amounts of retribution (as cited in Timmons, 2016). Nathanson elaborates on the second problem, stating that it is ethically heinous to make an individual pay for his or her actions by making them suffer the same way they made another individual or individuals suffer (as cited in Timmons, 2016). For example, Nathanson states that the principle could mean “we rape rapists” (as cited in Timmons, 2016, p. 539). Ethical egoism talks about the ethicality of something corresponding to whether the effects of certain behavior are enjoyable to every person but the individual participating in that behavior (Fieser, n.d.).…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Margaret Austin Professor Otto October 20, 2015 Guided Comparative Essay Ethics, the moral understanding that someone has a behavior towards. Utilitarian is the ethics of something that is right or wrong that is than assessed for a consequence. Bentham and Mill both have a different but similar opinion on utilitarianism. They both have the notion that utilitarianism is about the mind and body or the pain and pleasure we mankind endure.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As mankind and society have progressed over millennia, individuals have been searching for a true understanding of what is right and wrong as well as a proper way to live an ethical life. Through this curiosity many theories have been developed. However, is there unquestionably one certain theory and set of rules all of humanity should abide by? Though this question may continue to be up for debate, there are undoubtedly some theories that have respectable suggestions that attempt to give an answer. Among those many theories, a few that have developed are the consequentialist’s act utilitarianism, contractarianism, and the feminist’s, care ethics.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. Utilitarianism seeks to maximize good by minimizing harm to all while egoism seeks to maximize good by keeping the individual happy. As ethical egoism holds that moral conduct ought to be judged through self-interest. Egoism states that the good consequences for the individual agent outweigh the consequences placed upon…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that people who should be considered to be altruistic are those who act magnanimously to those outside of their family or general social group. I will use examples such as kin selection, animal altruism, and arguments against psychological egoism to assist in proving my thesis to be true. I will also address a counter argument made by some psychological egoists who believe that due to most people feeling pleasure while doing good things for others, that there are no people only act selfishly. I will reference James Rachel ’s essay “Psychological Egoism” to help enhance my theory that not all acts must be out of self interest.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment 1 Retributivists and utilitarians have fundamentally different ideas of what the goal of punishment should be. These ideas lead to opposite positions on whether courts should offer lesser sentences for criminals who collaborate with police. For example, a defendant is charged with selling $100,000 worth of heroin under their crime boss, who is suspected of distributing half the heroin in the city of Chicago and several murders as well. The prosecutor offers to drop the offender’s charges in exchange for information to convict the crime boss and threatens him with a 20-year-long prison sentences and a $2 million fine if they do not collaborate. I propose that the retributivist would not support this deal and the utilitarian would support it.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Egoism is the prescriptive theory that tells us in order to act moral, you should only act in your own self-interest. For whatever reason Cassandra has to reject the continuance of treatment, she was acting in her own self-interest. If Cassandra dies because of her actions, she will hurt many people, including her mother who stood up for Cassandra’s decision. But what Ethical Egoism states is that her actions were moral because Cassandra did refuse the treatment in her own self-interest. So regardless of how many people are crying at her funeral due to her actions, Cassandra’s actions were moral according to Ethical Egoism.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, ethical egoism states that an individual should always act in their own best interest. Ethical egoism is based on the belief that people should act in a way that brings maximum benefits to the individual in making a decision. It also states that the behavior of the individual is to maximize their own self interest and effect on other people is of much less consequences. For instance, those government officials such as LTA officers receives bribe instead of charging the motorist for over speeding or drinking and driving just for their own benefits. They use the same money to buy the lunch or gifts for their family members.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Framework Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that I feel aligned to personally. Utilitarianism states that the ethical choice is the one that provides the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people, even if that choice isn’t the best for everyone. Much of our politics are conducted using this approach, making decisions and laws that increase the amount of good while also reducing the amount of harm that is done. I believe this to be the most practical approach to most situations, especially when it comes to government. This is because it is virtually impossible to meet the needs or wants of every single person, so doing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people is ultimately what is best for the community.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays