Brigham City argued that it would have done no good to knock on the door because of the loud turmoil going on inside and at first the occupants had not heard the first announcement of the police officers presence. The Utah Supreme Court based its decision on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mincey v. Arizona that reasonableness of an exigency requires emergency assistance of an individual or property when there is a threat of serious injury or death, and this situation was not serious enough to justify a warrantless entry of the home (Supreme Court of The United States, 2006, p.
Brigham City argued that it would have done no good to knock on the door because of the loud turmoil going on inside and at first the occupants had not heard the first announcement of the police officers presence. The Utah Supreme Court based its decision on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mincey v. Arizona that reasonableness of an exigency requires emergency assistance of an individual or property when there is a threat of serious injury or death, and this situation was not serious enough to justify a warrantless entry of the home (Supreme Court of The United States, 2006, p.