Essay On Tort Law

Improved Essays
A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to.
There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.
The first element is known as the “duty of care.” A duty of care arises when the law recognizes a relationship between two parties, and in this relationship, one party has a legal obligation to act in a certain manner toward the other. The second element is a breach of the duty of care. A person or entity (such as a business or government agency) breaches the duty of care by not exercising reasonable care in fulfilling the duty. The third element is causation. The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two typed components of legal causation which are the actual cause and proximate cause. Actual cause exists when but for the breach of the duty of care, the injured person would not have suffered an injury. Proximate cause exists when the type and extent of the injured person’s injuries were reasonably related to the breach of the duty of care. The fourth element is injury. The injured person must have suffered an injury that can be remedied by money damages, which is the legal term for monetary compensation.
…show more content…
Negligence is conduct by an individual that drops below a reasonable standard of care and causes harm to another person. An individual has a duty to act reasonably when interacting with others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others, that individual is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Cardoza

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay # 1 – Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. In this essay, I argue against Cardoza’s ruling in the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. I disagree that the original judgment finding the Railroad Company negligent should have be overturned. I begin with a summary of the case.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ii. 9. 20 Injured citizens of Eugene, NM a. Claims Against: i. Vs. City Of Eugene 1. Rule: Negligence a. Rule Definition: When a reasonable person fails to do their duty to take a certain standard of care in their circumstances.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The duty of care that is owed has two distinct aspects: (1) it must first be shown that a duty was indeed owed the patient, and (2) the scope of that duty must be proven. (Guido, p. 70). Duty is created by a relationship and not by employment status. The second element of proof is the breach of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexis was the driver of the vehicle and Susie was a pedestrian. Therefore, Alexis owed a duty of care to Susie. Breach The failure to act as a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pbins 401 Assignment

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term negligence would apply in a situation where someone did not use the level of care or skills that another would ordinarily have used in a similar situation (Phillips, 2013). Alternatively, malpractice is considered the “careless performance of duty” and requires that the expected delivery of a level of care equal to educational capability, a deviation from that training occurred and someone was directly harmed by the action or inaction which was incongruent with training received to perform the duty (Phillips, 2013, p. 39). Moral Principles in Decision Making A way to guide our ethical practice is essential.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niles had every right to file a lawsuit against the City of San Rafael because there was a breach of duty that caused foreseeable damage to the Kelly. If Kelly would have suffered no harm, then that would have not been grounds to sue. Mr. Niles won the case because he was able to prove that all four elements of negligence were present. Mr. Niles was able to prove that duty of care was not properly conducted. Duty is defined as the legal obligation of care, performance, or observance to safeguard the rights of others.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that your insurance company must cover your medical expense and lost income even when the other person is at fault. The only way the other driver may have to pay for the costs is if there is a serious injury. To meet this requirement, you would have to have significant scarring, permanent injuries or disfigurements. Since these descriptions are fairly vague, the courts would have to figure out if your injuries fit the “serious injury” threshold.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nvq Unit 7

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Unit 7- Health and social care Kulthum Juma Principles of Safe Practice A duty of care is the legal obligation that all healthcare workers are imposed to address by, which provide an individual within the healthcare sector the adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing or having any act performed on them which could foreseeably harm others. A duty of care means providing care and support for individuals within the law and also within the policies and procedures agreed by the way of the employer in a work environment. Negligence is the failure to address to the policies and procedure of duty of care.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Under California law, the first aspect that must be established in a negligence case is the existence of duty. The existence of duty depends on “foreseeability of risk.” If there is a foreseeable risk, then it becomes the duty of an individual to adhere to solving it. If the individual fails to resolve the issue, and someone is harmed, that individual could then held liable for the incident. (6 Witkin, Summary of Cal.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group of ideas are designed to change an underlying liability rules in the civil justice system, tort reform. Tort reform often alters the cultural aspect of civil litigations and makes it difficult for the plaintiffs’ to do the following: a) whom to file the case against, b) filing a lawsuit, c) obtaining an enormous amount of money for their suffrage, and etc (Daniels & Martin, 2000). Even though, tort reform makes it difficult for the injured person to sue a company, expecting millions of dollars for every claim is ridiculous. Ramseyer and Rasmusen (2010) mentioned about McDonald’s Coffee incident when Ms. Liebeck received $2.86 million for a coffee spill. If McDonald’s keeps satisfying every injured person with the money they demand, their business will be penniless.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tort Of Negligence Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thirdly, Rebecca should have suffered harm due to the duty of care infringed by Michelle. These three aspects of the tort of negligence along with the relevant defence that may be available to Michelle briefly discussed below. Duty of Care ? Neighbor test? is the most common test arranged to ascertain whether in a given scenario, there was a duty of care or not.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction In order to establish criminal liability, the actus reus must generally be proved. The actus reus of an offence are comprised with the prohibited conduct, the relevant circumstances, the consequence and causation. Causation is one of the four elements of actus reus. Causation in the criminal context is concerned with the legal attribution of criminal responsibility for consequences.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays