Essay On Fifth Amendment

Improved Essays
The Fifth Amendment was created to protect the basic rights of those who are accused of a crime. It provides protection from unfair methods of prosecution and investigation for many. This amendment allows you to not be punished more than one time for the same crime. Every person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to a fair trial. At the time this Amendment was created people would be accused could have rights, and this amendment provides protections from unfair methods. The British Court of Equality uses the theory of truth seeking as opposed to the procedures that prosecutors use. This saves them from the burden of proving a case. These courts require the defendant to answer all of the questions that are thrown …show more content…
One well-known case is Smith vs. Massachutes, February 22, 2005. In this case, Melvin T Smith was on trial for illegal possession of a firearm. Smith was ruled not guilty because the state failed to show evidence of the guns in question’s actual length. The state later pointed to the Supreme Court’s ruling that if the gun was a pistol or a revolver it could be admitted as evidence to allow a firearm charge to go to jury. Smith argued that the jury said no and he was not guilty, but putting him on trial again would be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause. This clause states that you cannot be charged for the same crime twice. The state court of appeals rejected Smith’s argument and said that there was no Fifth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court then took a vote. They decided that if a judge ruled the defendant not guilty then they could not reverse the not guilty verdict at a later trial. Would this be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause? The Supreme Court took a vote that lead to a 5-4 win for Smith, but this method was not available at the time of Smith’s trial. Some courts have misinterpreted the amendment like in the Smith vs. Massachutes

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    While in the trail, the jury returned the verdict as guilty. They sent him to mandatory term of life imprisonment without a parole. Therefore, the government did not give him a parole, which violates the eighth amendment which would…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 vote that the evidence was illegally obtained and thus could not be used in the court of…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The People v. Smith case was decided in 1991 by the Supreme Court of Michigan. The issue was that a defendant, Ricky Franklin Smith, argued he should be resentenced because of the inclusion of the presentence investigation report of his previously expunged juvenile record (People, 1991). The Court of Appeals in Michigan agreed with the defendant and required that Smith be sentenced again. The Supreme Court, however, heard the case and reverse the decision stating the Smith did not need to be sentenced again on the basis of the inclusion of his juvenile record alone. Smith was originally convicted of breaking and entering, largely based upon his decision to plead guilty.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Malloy V. Hogan Summary

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ruling of The United States Supreme Court on Malloy v. Hogan,378U.S. 1(1964), the court was confronted with the issue of whether Mr. Malloy could utilize his Fifth Amendment right. To ensure that he did not incriminate himself in criminal activity during questioning in the state trial in the State of Connecticut (Neubauer and Fradella, 2009). The Supreme Court saw that the defendant had answered four of five questions during his testimony during the hearing and upon the last issue, Mr. Malloy invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to respond to the question. The State of Connecticut argued that the witness had answered the other matters without concern and found no reason that he should not respond to the last question asked to Mr.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract The Twenty-Sixth Amendment has the right to be repealed by Congress. During the time period of the Vietnam War of the Cold War, where the United States had conscripted their men into soldiers to fight against the communists in Vietnam. The main reason for the men to be drafted is to protect the South Vietnam from being taken over by the North Vietnam. As the American men were being drafted into the war, they were recently a few number of men who burned their draft cards in as an act of violation.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this time period Britain was barely putting the motion of laws into effect, for many individuals “Liberty” was absolute it was not a subject to political change. While liberty was in effect British Constitution Theorist listed all the rights an individual had but what they did not put was the “right to be free from arbitrary police power” (Garcia, p. 27). This in fact enraged several individuals yet like other countries if pushed came to shove then progress would be made. When the concept of double jeopardy appeared in England, it was said to have come from the same root has the right to grand jury. With this being said the main principle of double jeopardy came from the issue of Thomas Becket and Henry II.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Brandenburg v Ohio case deals with imminence and probability. In the Brandenburg case, Brandenburg’s type of speech was not imminent and the likelihood because there was no illegal action that was done, because of this the courts decided to favor Brandenburg. The Brandenburg case can be applied to the Smith’s situation because of imminence and probability. While participating in the protest, Smith walked up to the front of the crowd and was fifteen feet away from the police. The City of Rushmore believes that Smith was about to expose harm because while he was fifteen feet away, his six inch knife was visible to the police because the police could see that the knife was attached to Smith’s pants belt.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is because the “double jeopardy” clause only ensures that someone cannot be tried again in court, meaning if a prosecutor wanted…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation is a constitutional legal code that protects the rights of a citizen that is ensured in the Bill of Rights. It has been used in numerous cases throughout time to remind everyone that every citizen’s rights are protected. Some cases include Town of Greece v. Galloway, McDonald v. Chicago, Benton v. Maryland, and Atkins v. Virginia. In these cases, multiple people were tried for what were misunderstood as wrongdoings. Selective Incorporation is used widely in the judicial branch by judges and the jury to determine a verdict.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benton argued that since he was found not guilty for the larceny charge before that it was double jeopardy. The question at state with Benton’s case is if the Fifth Amendment was violated by the second indictment, trial, and conviction for larceny…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays