One well-known case is Smith vs. Massachutes, February 22, 2005. In this case, Melvin T Smith was on trial for illegal possession of a firearm. Smith was ruled not guilty because the state failed to show evidence of the guns in question’s actual length. The state later pointed to the Supreme Court’s ruling that if the gun was a pistol or a revolver it could be admitted as evidence to allow a firearm charge to go to jury. Smith argued that the jury said no and he was not guilty, but putting him on trial again would be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause. This clause states that you cannot be charged for the same crime twice. The state court of appeals rejected Smith’s argument and said that there was no Fifth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court then took a vote. They decided that if a judge ruled the defendant not guilty then they could not reverse the not guilty verdict at a later trial. Would this be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause? The Supreme Court took a vote that lead to a 5-4 win for Smith, but this method was not available at the time of Smith’s trial. Some courts have misinterpreted the amendment like in the Smith vs. Massachutes
One well-known case is Smith vs. Massachutes, February 22, 2005. In this case, Melvin T Smith was on trial for illegal possession of a firearm. Smith was ruled not guilty because the state failed to show evidence of the guns in question’s actual length. The state later pointed to the Supreme Court’s ruling that if the gun was a pistol or a revolver it could be admitted as evidence to allow a firearm charge to go to jury. Smith argued that the jury said no and he was not guilty, but putting him on trial again would be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause. This clause states that you cannot be charged for the same crime twice. The state court of appeals rejected Smith’s argument and said that there was no Fifth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court then took a vote. They decided that if a judge ruled the defendant not guilty then they could not reverse the not guilty verdict at a later trial. Would this be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause? The Supreme Court took a vote that lead to a 5-4 win for Smith, but this method was not available at the time of Smith’s trial. Some courts have misinterpreted the amendment like in the Smith vs. Massachutes