Example Of Selective Incorporation In The Bill Of Rights

Improved Essays
Selective Incorporation is a constitutional legal code that protects the rights of a citizen that is ensured in the Bill of Rights. It has been used in numerous cases throughout time to remind everyone that every citizen’s rights are protected. Some cases include Town of Greece v. Galloway, McDonald v. Chicago, Benton v. Maryland, and Atkins v. Virginia. In these cases, multiple people were tried for what were misunderstood as wrongdoings. Selective Incorporation is used widely in the judicial branch by judges and the jury to determine a verdict. Theses cases portray that the Constitution not only is used by the government, but also for the benefit of the citizens.
For example, the Town of Greece was targeted by Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens
…show more content…
Justice Anthony Kennedy told his opinion for the 5-4 majority. The Court said that the First Amendment suggested that the Establishment Clause was never meant to outlaw prayer. The prayers that were said by the Town of Greece did not talk badly about other religions which made it protected under the First Amendment. The Town of Greece won this case solely because of the Fourteenth Amendment and Selective Incorporation.
Another example of Selective Incorporation is the case McDonald v. Chicago. A Chicago ordinance banned the use of private gun ownership. Otis McDonald, a 76 year old retired maintenance engineer, lived in a neighborhood that was taken over by gangs and drug dealers. McDonald’s lawn was continuously littered on and hs garage had been broken into 5 times. McDonald was an experienced hunter and owned shotguns in his house, but in the case of a robbery he felt that it was not suitable and easy to
…show more content…
Therefore, the court overruled the larceny conviction from the second trial of John Benton. Benton later only had to serve ten years in jail compared to his previous 15 years he was supposed to serve. The larceny charge took off five years of jail time away from John Benton. Also, another case that involves Selective Incorporation is Malloy v. Hogan.
This case mainly references the Fifth Amendment, the right against self-incrimination. In the case, Malloy, a petitioner, was sentenced to one year in jail for unlawful gambling. After 3 months, however, he was released from jail and put on probation for 2 years. While malloy was on probation, he was asked to testify to a state inquiry into gambling and other criminal-related activities that Malloy was involved in. When he heard this, he declined to testify and answer their questions because it would have incriminated

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They took their case to the district court, which decided that the town of Greece did not violate the First Amendment by starting their town meetings with a prayer. There was no intentional suppression or exclusion of non-christian…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hodges and Loving v. Virginia that were similar. In both cases the petitioners traveled out of state to marry. Upon returning, they were both deprived of their personal liberties. Although the liberty is different specifically, both were charged under the Due Process Clause. Both their states were depriving them of either justice or discrimination, which in return is why both petitioners in each case fought back against their state to fight for their rights.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio was about how a lady named, Dollree Mapp was convicted for having obscene materials after a admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She argued that it was constitutional and the first amendment gave her the right to possess that. Freedom of expression shouldn’t be have a price to pay. Mapp did win her case and with her case came the exclusionary…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As the nation has evolved, the interpretation of the Constitution has varied. While the Sixth Amendment has been largely upheld in most domestic cases, in fact it has routinely been denied to those who are entitled to its protection when the government deems the situation as a threat to national security. Similarly, the understanding of the Eighth Amendment has been strictly interpreted in matters of domestic law, but the meaning is deviated from in cases where national security has taken the…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The author also concludes that constitutions should guarantee, not grant, the rights of…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Amendment did you choose for your topic? Include the number and the text. The 2nd Amendment, The Right to Bear Arms MLA citation for the Bill of Rights (official government site): "The Bill of Rights: A Transcription." National Archives and Records Administration.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    QUESTION PRESENTED Given the long-arm statute, which state or federal courts have proper personal jurisdiction over Wal-Mart and Smith Family Farms from the illness of a tainted cantaloupe that originated in Colorado? BRIEF ANSWER Given the long arm statute, Tennessee state or federal courts will most likely have proper personal jurisdiction over Wal-Mart but not over Smith Family Farm. As the principal place of business and place of incorporation, Wal-Mart is subject to suit in both Arkansas and Delaware. Smith Family Farms is subject to suit in Colorado.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, the Bill of Rights is incorporated into the state government as well as the Congress thanks to the Incorporated Doctrine. Peter is proposing that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause and that the school…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. (Vol. 15, Is. 5, pp. 1539-1559) Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6b36aece-4bd5-4961-b371-ca7f92032795%40sessionmgr110&vid=2&hid=125 Martin, D. (2012, March 18).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Due Process Clause...”. After review of the case by the Supreme Court, they had found it to be in violation of the fourteenth amendment but, saw the punishment as a correction instead of a…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The right to not to testify against oneself is one of the few parts that make up the fifth amendment. This is also known by many as the right against self-incrimination. This right allows for people to refuse to against themselves during a trial unless there is obvious evidence against the person being trialed. Authority figures, like police officers or judges, aren’t able to forcibly disclose any information concerning the person who is…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective incorporation is a constitutional doctrine that ensures states cannot enact laws that take away the constitutional rights of American citizens that are enshrined in the Bill of Rights (1). This means that individual states cannot take away rights that are guaranteed by the constitution of the United States of America. For example in the case of McDonald vs. Chicago the city of Chicago attempted to no longer allow certain guns from being carried except rifles or shotguns in one’s home. There were many suits filed against this because the bill of rights allows people keep and bear arms. This means that at a city or state level no one can ban people from carrying guns.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays