Essay On Canada Vs Usa

Improved Essays
Both Canada and the USA have governments that seem to work quite well, amidst their differences. While the USA is a republic, Canada is a constitutional monarchy, and both are based on the ideas of democracy. However, they are different in many ways, and each government has it’s share of better methods than the other. For example, the USA has a definite term of office set for the president, 4 years, so that the president will know when he is done, and elections do not come as a surprise to the citizens. In Canada, the Prime Minister may sit for up to 5 years, calling an election any time he/she wants, from his/her first day in office, until the day before their last day in office. This can come as a surprise to the public, leaving them unprepared for an election. This is one of the ways that makes the USA system seem better than the Canadian. However, with the exact date known well in advance, campaigns in the USA start over a year ahead of the election, which can be quite annoying to many people. Canadian campaigns last for only 50 days.
The Canadian system does have it’s strong points, as well. In the USA, presidents may only be in office for a maximum of 10 years with the rare possibility that their predecessor is no longer able to run the
…show more content…
Each country has different strengths and weaknesses, which balance each other out quite nicely. Canadian voters are more involved in government decisions, but lack the involvement in who is running the government, the Prime Minister appoints his staff. America lets their voters get more involved in choosing their leaders, but they cannot determine who to blame when something goes wrong. If I had to choose between them for sure, I believe I would choose Canada as the better government. Canada has a few poor qualities, such as the prime minister having immense power, but they can be made up for simply, such as choosing a prime minister that everyone can

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Maple syrup influences Canada. Similarly, Quebec influences Canada as well. To sum up, many politicians will use method to win whatever they want, but sometimes they may forget what do they citizens want. Some politicians want to get right for their people, but actually they win the benefit for themselves.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, it is undeniable that the structure was impeccable. Lengthier campaigns drastically grew engagement, issues discussed, and insight on leaders. All of these factors led to the historically high voter turnout. However, change needs to be gradually implemented and federal election campaigns should be lengthened to a certain extent. At the moment, Canada is not fully ready to reach that level nor do they have the intention to do ever reach the degree of severity evident in the United States’ campaign period.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, he briefly describes five key flaws in the Canadian political system. For example, Clark points to the fact that Canadian federal politics lacks competition. Second, he makes the claim that two important functions are not being performed. These functions are: “holding the people in power accountable and offering electors an acceptable place to turn” (Clark 2004: 400). Third, he argues that certain political actors do not have much influence…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Voices within Canada: Of hockey, Medicare and Canadian dreams” written by Stephen J. Toope questions what we want to be as Canadians as we approach our 150th birthday. Toope is the director of the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto, and is well qualified to question our country’s dreams as we approach an intimidatingly stormy future. To his audience of Canadians of all ages, Toope questions if current Canadian state is the best that can be done. Should hockey and Medicare be the defining features of a country that has sustained democratic rule for so long? He approaches the topic immediately with an emotional appeal to Canadians that motivates the audience to seek answers for what they believe in.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The English Canadians did not believe the French Canadians were providing a fair share to the war effort. The French Canadians believed they owed no loyalty to Britain or France so they were against the conscription. This lead to raised cost of living and created social unrest, ultimately destroying the very essence of national unity between the French and English Canadians. The English Canadians were close with and in support of the British Empire so they were for the conscription, as they wanted to help. The conscription allowed Canada to defend Great Britain as they had wanted, but it severed any ties between the French and English Canadians leading to war within Canada.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are significant flaws with the electoral districts, candidates do not have to win a majority in order to win the election and this system encourages tactical voting. With over 60% of voters not being represented by the current majority government, the process of reforming the electoral system should begin soon to give these people a voice in their government (“Results of the Canadian federal election,…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both power of Prime Minister of Canada and President of United State have their advantage and disadvantage which contribute to their own country which has different political system. It is better to have different political system which work for them in their own countries instead of pursuing more powerful…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Quebec Sovereignty Essay

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If Canada were to allow Quebec special constitutional privileges such as allowing them there own constitutional veto, appointment of supreme court judges, and have them recognized as a distinct society, and allow them the possibility of secession, then other parts of Canada may start to want their own constitutional amendments that could ask for the same thing which could literally destroy national unity and tear our country apart. With the increased threat of Quebec nationalism and a newly elected separatist government, it would be best advised for the rest of Canada to slightly increase the power of the central government to enforce a Canadian nationalism rather than just regional nationalism. It is highly recommended that the federal government control social and cultural policy so that Canada can have a unified social culture. On the other hand, issues like job training, education, health care and social assistance should be controlled by the provinces but allow some federal oversight to make sure that all the provinces are getting adequate government funding to the need of each province. Centralization is important because it ensures that each province is running its government efficiently and that all provinces are getting the same resources…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Trudeau Government

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Trudeau Government anticipates change in the foreign policy. As well as, change for Canada in the international realm. On October 19, 2015 there was a highly contested election in Canada. This election had a significant liberal victory and a high voter turnout. The parliament composition was taken by the new Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In Canada

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Provinces have been more daring in electoral change, both in the past (Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia every single utilized system other than…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First reason I am proud to be Canadian is since Canada has one of the best healthcare system. Canada is one of few countries that provides free healthcare. This means that people are able to get basic treatments despite their personal income and standard of living. Canada’s healthcare is also considered one of the best since it is very accessible meaning that there are many hospitals that are available for people to visit and use. Moreover Canada’s healthcare is efficient since there is a high standard for becoming a doctor.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another. Within the Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative powers are fused together to set and control the government (Mintz et al. 331-332).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays