Hegel Social Discourse Analysis

Discourse is a simple, flat forum, where replies flow down the page in a line. It is known as formal discussion of a topic in speech or writing among individuals, but it has also come, within linguistics for instance, to mean the way in which linguistic elements are united so as to constitute variant, a structure of meaning larger than the sum of its parts. In the society, social practices and institutions are both integrated by and situated within forms of discourse and works as organizing and producing meaning among individuals. Language understands embodies of discourse. Discourse is conceived of as signifying ways of systematically organizing human experience of the social world in language and thereby constituting modes of knowledge. It provides rules of justification for what counts as knowledge within a particular context, and at the sometime stipulate what does not count as knowledge in that context. Focualt and Lyotard tries to define that discourse is a language which primary function is understood the question of culture and the society social structure. Lyotard seems that discourse is a genre. It is justified by sets of rules that are set by the time. Class is a group of individuals within a society which adopts same socioeconomic status. Class is important for society as class is the combined form of the individuals and individuals form the society. It means class and society both have the same source and individuals share the economic which is used to widely for social mobility. Classes may primarily be formed in an economic group. Equal economic factors serve the essential for identity and present the class disputes in order to generate something new. Class divisions are typically seen as fundamental to the satisfaction of society and as such may be associated with difference in power and culture. Classes are difficult to understand as a aggregates form of individuals, where class analysis would be concerned with classifying some common attribute shared by these …show more content…
It works according to the will of citizens in the family and private sphere are included in it. It referred to the third section of society and it is distinct from government and business. It makes a social bond among the individuals for fulfillment of their purpose of acquiring wealth. It is a matter of exchanging of goods for their day to day potential. Human being gains an identity of interdependence of each other. He acquires a sense of dependence on each other, so that he may obey duty to each other. They would have support to each other for their social purpose. Hegel characterizes the civil society into the ‘universal family’ ( Culture Theory, 63) in which individuals are composed into the corporations that are closely connected by the means of a common craft or profession and where members of family work together to protect to their right of job, right to education, right to social protection, from dominant. Hegel contrasts the civil society with the state where individuals competing with each other for their different interests, aims for well being of the society. In the civil society, the male domination over the female is known as the patriarchy, because it is set up by the male, so that he may have dominance over the woman counterparts through various ways such as, income, wealth, power and property rights all including inequality and in the sphere where woman only becomes only machine of manufacturing of child, nurturing and house maid. Kristeva and Cixous, the feminist writers, raise question against the male domination in the