Criteria For A Just War

Improved Essays
According to Aquinas, there are three criteria for a war to be just. The first criteria is that the ruler or authority of a nation must make the decision to go to war. This is because the ruler was chosen to make decisions that will benefit the whole nation and not just themselves. No private individual has the authority to declare war because they do not have the correct intentions. The second criteria for just war is that there must be a just cause for the war to be fought. This means that the enemy must deserve to be punished for something that they have done wrong. The last criteria for just war is that the end goal should be peace and not destruction. The nation waging war must “intend the advancement of good or the avoidance of evil” in order for the war to be just. …show more content…
The first modern criteria is that war must be a last resort. This means that there can be no other options, like discussion or meetings, to solve the problems between the two nations. The next modern criteria is that there needs to be reasonable hope for success in achieving the objectives of the war. The military cannot be tasked with an impossible objective because it is not worth the money or human lives. The third criteria is that the war, and the actions that come with it, must be proportional with what the enemy has done. For example, it would not be proportional if my roommate stole a tide pod from me for her laundry and I decided to retaliate by cutting all of her uniforms in half. The last criteria is that the war needs to be pursued and won through just means. This means that the rules for prisoners of war and non-combatants are followed when trying to get

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    War has become an acceptable way in which groups and states engage in problem-solving, no matter the intention. If war was frowned upon by humanity, or rather, those who are in powerful positions to start a war, then alternative methods of solving a disagreement would be primary and there would be no motivation to declare…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War. Some consider it as a necessary evil, something that we need but don’t want. Others think of war as horrendous violence and death that is unnecessary. On one hand, war has the ability to erase injustice, end tyranny, and bring freedom and liberty to people’s lives. On the other hand, war is a brutal, violent, and tragic tool, and there is always a different way to settle conflicts, such as negotiation.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karen Armstrong Summary

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Therefore, this war between the two was just and falls under the just war because it's considered the principles of the just war theory. Overall, I would refer to this chapter for future classes because the chapter was narrow and…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay, three reasons from the Just War Theory will be used to outline the vindication of the war; they are legitimate authority, possessing right intention, and reasonable chance of…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over the years, we have had forty-three presidents who varied in age, political views and race. Each of these president’s had their own ideas and view points on different subjects, one being when should the United States go to war. Is it important to be seen as powerful country, or more important to save the country’s resources? Many citizens put their trust into the president’s and those who make these decisions, to make our country safe and have those fighting for our country, come home safely. Although each president has had different viewpoints, there may not be a definite clear answer on when the United States should put themselves into international conflicts.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Johnny Got His Gun Essay

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although, the purpose of war can be argued, the overall idea is that war can not be justified because it can lead to the overall failure of an individual, affect the relationships…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aim of Just War Theory is to provide a guide to the right way for states and countries to act in potential conflict situations. It only applies to states or countries and not to individuals however an individual can use the theory to help them decide whether it is morally right to take part in a particular war. A Christian would agree with the Just War theory because it gives a reliable guide of what is acceptable when war is to be broken out (and there was also wars in the Bible like in Deuteronomy 20 when Israel was told that they will be going into war. Also in 2Chronicles 32). For example, war must be the last resort which means that you must have tried other options like talking it out to solve the problem before you engage in war.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assess the Athenians’ argument and actions from the standpoint of pacifism and just war theory. Which position do you find most compelling, and why? Just War theory portrays a practical look at the morality of war in comparison to pacifism, allowing the opportunity to form international procedures and protocol in an attempt to control conflict. During The Peloponnesian War the Athenians offered a valid and in-depth argument on their views of justice in war, over time this has developed into many different perspectives on the place of war in international politics, most noticeably pacifism and just war theory.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence, the Just War Theory, which proposes that war can be waged ethically, can be broken down into two main components: jus ad bellum and jus in bello. The first component jus ad bellum refers to a set of criteria which, if met, provide states with ethical justification for engaging in war; these criteria include just cause, right intention, proportionality, last resort, legitimate war-declaring authority, and probability of success. The second component jus in bello refers to ethical guidelines for conducting war, which entails the principle of discrimination, prohibition of certain weapons, proportionality of force, and humane treatment of POWs. Notably, there are several empirical arguments against the JWT.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Think about it this way , war is not justifiable . Would you stand by and watch while your family and country are being attacked by a formidable force to bodily and deadly harm ? Or would you fight back ? How could you fight back ? War is not justifiable to remember .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Many understand the fact that war is rarely ever justifiable and that the idea…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2. I believe that there are a few reasons a war would be considered just. A fight for freedom and independence from a tyrannical government that is oppressing its people would be a valid reason to wage war. I also…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRO: In the opening chapter of The Rules of War, Walzer makes an important trace to the past: the lineage of military code and chivalry. During the middle ages, “the aristocratic warrior” benefited largely from this form of code, because it “marked of knights from mere ruffians and bandits…and was designed for their convenience.” Shortly after, Walzer examines to what extent notions of honor and chivalry are embodied in contemporary warfare. Near the end of his introduction, Walzer mentions a significant point that foreshadows the main focus of the book.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But if the winner does not observe the principles of the just war, in an effort to recover the funds invested in the war, then the winner’s efforts could be invalidated and could become a victimizer of the defeated. This could lead the winner to lose its standing before their nationals and the international community, as Briand Oren (P.161) pointed out: “Failure to construct principles of Just Post Bellum is to allow unconstrained war termination.” That's why theorists of just war recommend political and military victors apply the principles of “Jus Post Bellum” to reconcile, rehabilitate and educate for a major victory. Is to have as a war trophy lasting peace and sustained progress over time, where there are no losers and no winners, but neither humiliated nor…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, technological advances in warfare have challenged the foundational principles of Just War Theory and generated scrutiny around ethical behavior in combatant environments. Just War Theory refers to a set of rules that a sovereign state is expected to follow before engaging in war, during war, and after war—jus ad bellum, jus in bellum, and jus post bellum, respectively. With the increased employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) or drone strikes under the Obama Administration, one may doubt the morality of these attacks. Specifically, the aims of this essay seek to answer the question on whether or not drone strikes in Yemen adhere to the principles of Just War Theory. Considering the unprecedented and regular use of this technology,…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays