Constitutional Monarchy Essay

Great Essays
Constitutional Monarchy is the only way to govern a country?
A constitutional monarchy is when both the Government’s and the Crown’s powers are restricted by the overriding statute referred to as the constitution. Australia serves as the best example of a constitutional monarchy, other examples include New Zealand, Canada and Denmark. The United Kingdom is slightly different with no single constitutional document but a prominent Monarchy. The USA however, consists of a constitution without a monarchy, crown or head of state, this is known as a Republic. Other examples of a Republics include Russia and Brazil.
What is thought-provoking is that while Australia, the UK and the US have formed different types of government, they still abide by
…show more content…
Australia’s Division of Powers and Separation of Powers are an important part of our democratic society.
Australia’s separation of powers divides the institutions of government into three different branches. This includes legislative, whose role is to create laws, executive, whose role is to enforce laws and judicial whose role is to interpret laws and solve civil disputes. Although there is a general understanding that the separation of powers do not interfere with each other, there is sometimes a ‘common ground’ between all three levels. For example front bench ministers in Parliament exist in both the executive and legislative departments.
The separation of powers ensures that these roles can be carried out effectively without partiality. It keeps one part of the government from dominating and becoming too powerful. History shows that unlimited power in the hands of one group or establishment means that others are suppressed and their powers condensed. The separation of powers seeks to prevent abuse of power and be a safeguard for liberty. An example of this can be shown when the legislative department also had the authority to interpret laws and solve civil disputes in ancient Britain. (Parlament.gv.at,
…show more content…
Australia’s court system is divided into different categories for numerous reasons.
Australia’s court system is divided into four different categories, High, Supreme, District and Magistrates. Within these courts there is an appellate jurisdictions and consists of both criminal and civil cases. Depending on the severity of the crime, different cases will be heard in different courts. For example murder would be heard in the Supreme Court whilst minor offences might be heard in the district or magistrates court. This allows plaintiffs and defendants to pursue their case if they are certain that there has been a legal wrong.
Lower courts such as the district court or the magistrate’s court are compelled by higher courts, such as the High or Supreme Court when reaching their decisions, unless they have the ability to distinguish the facts of the case before them from the precedent case. To put it simply there would have been several injustices over history if there was only one court. It also allows the different States to have different courts to suit their jurisdictions and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equal power among each branch protects against tyranny because no branch is overpowered. The three departments of power are separated and…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Topic 1: “Should QLD reinstate an upper house?” The actions of Queensland Politicians, over the past years, have produced an object lesson in the dangers of unrestrained authority and as a result has prompted the question, “should Queensland reinstate an upper house”. Although reinstating the legislative council will not amend the many issues facing Queensland, it will be beneficial to return to a bicameral state. In 1922 legislation was passed in Queensland abolishing the upper house, also known as the legislative council, and as a result is the only unicameral state in Australia (Queensland Government 2011).…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial power of the U.S shall be invested in one supreme court”. This shows that each branch has its own job while still having to communicate with each other. Overall, separation of powers become the most important because each branch has a say in what is right or wrong.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this system created by the Constitution, one department’s ambition and need for power hinders the other department’s liberty. In order to possess power, the departments must find an equal balance. This equal balance is “necessary to control the abuses of government. ”(51) Although equal separation of power is ideal, “the legislative authority necessarily predominates.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers defend against tyranny by separating the three branches, legislative, executive, judicial. They should be extremely separate, Madison said in a federalist paper that, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). Some examples that they are separate is that they all have different jobs, Congress makes laws, the president and his cabinet enforce them, and the justices of the supreme court interpret them. They are only supposed to do their job, not the other branches. You cannot have the president fire judges because they disagree, it would lead to politics influencing the cases.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.0 Introduction As a nation, Australians have become a unique group of individuals, vastly different from the British who settled in this country. Australia is a multicultural continent with its own laws, constitution and systems, so why should Australians still be a part of the constitutional monarchy under Britain? Why should it not become a republic, and increase its independence? This report will investigate the currant system Australia operates under, and the suggestions that have been made in the past to change to a republic, to come to a conclusion on whether or not Australia should become a republic, or remain a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the founding fathers did not want one single branch of the government to have too much power over the others. Separation of Powers allows for Checks and Balances. The legislative branch is responsible for passing laws that the executive can enact or veto. The Judiciary can review whether or not a bill, or a law is lawful under the Constitution. Moreover, Congress could remove the president if he or she is not doing his or her job properly.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another form of checks and balances has been the implementation of constrained parliamentarism. Another form of checks and balances has been established with Parliament seeing the need for different institutions such as the Auditor General’s office, Freedom of Information, Integrity commissions and the Ombudsman to reformed upper houses (Fenna,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another time we see separation of powers is in the venn diagram in document 6. It shows the split between powers given to government and powers given to the states. The central governments and the state governments have their own powers but they also share powers. For example, one of powers given to the government is to regulate trade, while on the other hand one of the powers given to the states is to set up local governments and hold elections.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So how the separation of powers worked was the government was split into 3 branches; The executive (The president and “workers”), Legislature (The senate and house of representatives) and the Judicial branch (Supreme court and lower courts.) So checks and balances “act” was built so that no branch would become to powerful. So each one branch is basically watched by the other two. So for example; The president (the “executive branch”) can veto laws by congress. Congress can override the veto by a 2/3rds vote.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts are dependent upon a decision, which is orchestrated within the ground of a higher court, thus being binding on the lower courts. The Australian High Courts responsibility in analyzing the interpretation of the Constitution is crucial. It must adhere to being independent from both state and the Commonwealth, in order for it to protect the distribution of powers. The Supreme Court is the highest jurisdiction in each state or territory.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government’s process may be handled as in the Constitution, but the rights stated in it are not followed; so do we really live under ”Constitutional Government”? Having a democracy means that not everyone is going to get what they want, but do the…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays