Similarities Between Colonists And Anti Federalists

Improved Essays
First off, some really big issues was how the colonist had a high tax cost but they had low currency. Consequently, the colonist would have no money after taxes which is why so many colonist started to protest against the government. the government were not able to pay the soldiers because the colonist wouldn’t pay their taxes. Furthermore, the colonist were even able to refuse anything the government asked them to do. However, the main reason the colonist didn’t pay their taxes was because they couldn’t even afford it so they would either hide the money or just beat up the tax collector. Relatively, the reason why people didn’t want to be bankers was because people would beat them up when they went to collect taxes. Also the bankers would …show more content…
They believed that the powers of the government under the constitution would threaten their “liberties” and individual rights. The Anti-federalist weren’t a very centralized group they didn’t agree on a lot of things. For example, Some of the Anti-federalist opposed the constitution because they believed that having a strong central government would threaten popular sovereignty. As others believed that the government would turn out like Great Britain to were the government would become to powerful and it would be hard to resist the government.or fix it. After a lot of arguments the Anti-federalist and federalist came to a compromise and the constitution was then created in 1787 which included the Bill of …show more content…
(Explorers.) But most of all the U.S constitution fixed tons of problems that were deathly needed to be fixed. The constitution also made the anti-federalist and federalist come to a sort of “agreement” to were the government wouldn’t be too strong nor would it be too weak. They went into a balance. So how this happened was through the separation of powers, checks and balances, amendments, taxes. So how the separation of powers worked was the government was split into 3 branches; The executive (The president and “workers”), Legislature (The senate and house of representatives) and the Judicial branch (Supreme court and lower courts.) So checks and balances “act” was built so that no branch would become to powerful. So each one branch is basically watched by the other two. So for example; The president (the “executive branch”) can veto laws by congress. Congress can override the veto by a 2/3rds vote. The supreme court can check on congress by declaring a law unconstitutional. The power of the supreme court is balanced by the president aka. The executive branch. The government also fixed the tax problem so that the citizens wouldn’t have to pay so much money and so the colonist would have to pay their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States had won independence from Great Britain in the Revolutionary War with the U.S. government being the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation failed in not being able to stabilize the Federal Government after the war and a new government was drawn up by the United States’ best and brightest. This new governing document is the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution created a new form of government in which to stabilize the government, economy, culture, and social aspects of the United States. The Presidents of this new Republic were the driving force in which stabilization or instability were to be created. George Washington strongly helped to stabilize the United States government with few instabilities…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It also created a separation of power with three different branches of government as opposed to simply a legislature. The Constitution created a bicameral legislature, one with equal representation and house based on population, as opposed to a unicameral legislature with equal representation. The Constitution also gave the federal government significantly more power, such as to tax, to regulate trade, to control the currency, and to pass any necessary laws in order to carry out their…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution did a better job of achieving the principles that the American Revolution fought for than the Articles of Confederation did. The United States Constitution applied and enforced all of the rights that were gained in the Revolutionary war and granted the United States with a democracy. The Government could be divided into three branches of power; the colonist could choose who they wanted to represent them in the House of Representatives, and through the Bill of Rights freedom was bestowed onto all free citizens. Under the United States Constitution the government is divided into three branches, The Executive branch, the Legislative branch, and the judicial branch.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believed that the greatest threat to liberty was posed by a tyrannical central government and that power in the hands of the common people was preferred. When it came to the National Bank, they were headstrong on their perspectives in economics with negative expression of the National Bank. However, many economic policies…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in early America was a period of experimentation. With the Revolution over, colonies began drafting their state constitutions, and America worked on the Articles of Confederation. This new country was eager to construct a smooth- running government, but the poorly constructed document only led to problems. Due to a lack of national powers, which ultimately led to an uprising and other difficulties, it was only a matter of time before the United States would need to make corrections to the government. This “Critical Period” eventually proved that America needed to repair their government and create a brand-new constitution.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with the basis of government. Unfortunately, the government put forth by the Articles of Confederation failed to be an effective one due to the limits of power it imposed on Congress. Congress was denied several vital duties including being able to tax the states directly, enforce treaties and regulate trade. The powers denied to Congress made it too weak, and as a result an ineffective government. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress could not directly tax the colonies.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Written in 1787, the United States Government defines the Constitution as the “supreme law of the United States,” providing the framework of our national government, laws, and basic freedoms we see today However, by the end of the Revolutionary War in 1776 up until 1787, Congress originally operated under the Articles of Confederation. Considering that the Articles of Confederation got the young nation through its war with England, over time, it was soon realized that this first governing document wasn’t of much use when it finally came down to running an entire country. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress was very limited on what it could actually do, which furthered our nation’s difficulties politically and financially. Thus, as states exercised more power, the federal government became too weak, and Shay’s Rebellion in 1786 and 1787, among other circumstances, ultimately catalyzed the call to action to establish a more powerful central government (Roark). At the 1787 Constitutional Convention,…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays