Question #2: Summarize at least three landmark cases made by the US Supreme Court and discuss their impact on the Juvenile Justice system. The practices of early America resulted in harsher punishments for juveniles than adults who may have committed the same crime. By the nineteenth century, these practices began to change through campaigns advocating rights for children, as they were becoming aware that children might not be as responsible for their crimes as adults, like previously believed. This eventually led to the nation’s first juvenile court that was established in Cook County, Chicago in 1899. Since then, there have been many court decisions that have assisted with the way the juvenile justice system practices today.…
Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…
However, juveniles are still young and naive and may not realize the consequences of their actions. While many argue that juveniles should face the consequences of their actions,…
Since Washington State Juvenile Disposition Guidelines have stated the age range a juvenile could be tried in juvenile court of jurisdiction, it would be easier for the judge to determine if the person should be sentenced in juvenile or adult court jurisdiction. The confusion of the exact age a person is fully mature and should be consider adult makes it hard for judges under blended sentence to determine the appropriate court of jurisdiction for the juvenile. Following a research in psychology and neurology that confirms that young people’s brains are not fully formed until in their mid-20s, some people presumed that juvenile under 21 should not be tried as an adult. Contradictory to what the research have claimed, Catherine Rampwell in her…
The question of whether or not minors under the age of 18 should be treated differently when being read their rights has come up in the current news. There are differences between minors and adults, “Children are different from adults. The Supreme Court has in other contexts concluded that children cannot be viewed as "mini adults" under the law because they lack the maturity and foresight to understand the full consequences of their actions. The same holds true when they are considered suspects and are being questioned by law enforcement officers,”(“How Should Police Read…”).…
The first nation’s juvenile court was established in Cook County, Illinois. One of the first judge at the nation’s juvenile court, judge Julian Mack stated the goal for the early juvenile court would be that “The child… be made to know that he is face to face with the power of the state, and more emphatically, be made to feel that he is the object of its care and solicitude,” (Pa, Rt.). Although many people in the United States believe that juveniles should not be tried as adults it is more appropriate to teach juveniles a lesson because no one knows what their instincts are, and it can be a threat to society because they will always have that negative mentality in mind. What solutions are there to these situations, or can there be any resolution…
Adolescents need to know what results from their actions. Because of this, it is followed that juveniles should be tried as adults. If children want to act like adults and commit crimes, then they should be treated as adults and…
Juvenile law is typically governed by the state and most states set the age for criminal culpability at eighteen (deferring between seventeen and nineteen in some cases) (Walsh, 2016). The founders of the juvenile court saw it as “a system of justice that would protect youth from potential harms of adult court and that seek to not only punish but also to advance the ‘best interests’ of youth.” The juvenile court, unlike adult court, is guided by parens patriae, which is Latin for “state as parent.” The juvenile court is set up to act as the parent and it can punish and dismiss cases how it seems is appropriate, while also seeking to help juveniles in a way that can lead them to live productive lives (Mears, Kuch, Lindsey, Siennick, Pesta, Greenwald & Bloomberg,…
Some young adults are tried as adults in court because they are young adults who like to offend or because of the crime they committed was too serious to ignore so they are now they are going to testify as an adult. When a young adult is being tried as an adult their case gets transferred to adult criminal court through a process called a waiver. While being tried as an adult in adult court gives the young adult more protection it can also have its disadvantages too, including the possibility of severing time in an adult prison. In some states a young adult offender must be at least 16 years old to be eligible for a waiver to be adult court. But in some other states preteen as young as 13 could be allowed to a waiver .…
Estudillo claims juveniles should be tried as adults in court. Minors who commit certain crimes such as murder should be tried as adults. It is stated “[Juvenile] laws were first created to handle small cases such as truancy and vandalism” (Estudillo). This quote explains how these laws were clearly not meant for huge crimes, but for less serious crimes. Further stating a kid has enough knowledge to know committing a crime is wrong.…
Children as young as nine years old are being tried as an adult in trial. Is it fair to hold these children and teens to the same mentality of adults? Children and teens should not be tried as adults, instead the judicial system should focus on…
There are always individuals whom do not believe that juveniles should be tried as adults. In an experiment with mock jurors, “younger defendants were perceived as less accountable and less competent” (Semple and Woody 302). Also in the experiment of Semple and Woody, the defendant’s age did not affect conviction judgements; younger defendants’ were given a shorter sentence than the older defendants’ (302). Even though they see that the person committed the crime they do not want to give the same long term consequences’. Also in Semple and Woody’s study, the severity of the crime was also taking into account for the juvenile offenders (302).…
Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…
The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…
Today, more youths are involved in gangs, murders, and assaults than history has shown. So, if these children are capable of committing adult crimes, shouldn’t they face adult consequences? It seems that the severity of juvenile crime has risen so much, that it is hard to distinct it from adult crimes. On the other hand, most adult offenders we find today, who commit murder or assault are not first time offenders. The unfortunate thing is that a survey given by the Pretrial Services Resource Center found that an astonishing number of juveniles in adult facilities were charged with nonviolent crimes (ABCNews.com: Juveniles in Adult Jails.…