United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966) was a landmark opinion in which the U.S. Supreme Court evaluated juvenile court proceedings and the guaranteed constitutional rights of the juvenile. The court determined the juvenile had been deprived of constitutional rights during certain juvenile court proceedings. With this decision, the court’s attempt was to institute due process for juveniles as in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. This entitled every juvenile in court proceedings to receive all the protections for due process. These protections included; to have a judicial hearing, be represented by an attorney during the hearing, access to documents being considered by the juvenile court, and a statement of the reasons in support of the waiver order. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) was the first decision by the U.S. Supreme Court for juvenile delinquency procedures. The ruling extended due process rights to juveniles. Specifically, in the areas of; right to a notice of charges in order to prepare for defense, right to legal counsel even if they cannot afford one, right to hear sworn testimony and to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the right against
United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966) was a landmark opinion in which the U.S. Supreme Court evaluated juvenile court proceedings and the guaranteed constitutional rights of the juvenile. The court determined the juvenile had been deprived of constitutional rights during certain juvenile court proceedings. With this decision, the court’s attempt was to institute due process for juveniles as in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. This entitled every juvenile in court proceedings to receive all the protections for due process. These protections included; to have a judicial hearing, be represented by an attorney during the hearing, access to documents being considered by the juvenile court, and a statement of the reasons in support of the waiver order. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) was the first decision by the U.S. Supreme Court for juvenile delinquency procedures. The ruling extended due process rights to juveniles. Specifically, in the areas of; right to a notice of charges in order to prepare for defense, right to legal counsel even if they cannot afford one, right to hear sworn testimony and to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the right against