Comparative Essay: Difference Between Murder And Manslaughter

Improved Essays
Difference of a murder and manslaughter
- Murder is a killing of a human being supported by a criminal intent of malice or purposely, knowingly, or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to life.
- Manslaughter is a killing supported by malice negated by a heat of passion, reckless or negligent criminal intent.
In this case, Joe has intentionally murdered another person In Oregon the law is divided depending on the categories of the stated of mind of the crime. Joe can be charged with manslaughter reckless, negligent, or elevated to aggravating depending the facts of Joe crime. Manslaughter first degree ORs 163.118
One of the definitions in this law is recklessly or with the criminal negligence, causing the death of a person while operating a motor vehicle under the influence within 10 years prior to current offense or prior assault conviction. Looking the definition of criminal negligence in the law 166.635 said;
…show more content…
2) “Conduct” means act or omission and its accompanying mental state; Joe drive an F-350 pickup truck
3) “Criminal negligence” when used with respect to a result or to circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, means that a person fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur that the circumstance exists; Joe can be charged with criminal negligence for not stop as soon he got the hives and prevent the accident.
In my opinion, Joe, in this case, can be charged with involuntary manslaughter in de second degree, for the accident causing the killing of one person. But also they can see he does not have prior and maybe Joe is a good citizen and lower the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People v. Lardie, 452 Mich. 231, 551 N.W.2d 656 (1996), in this case the defendants asked the Supreme court of appeals to review their felony convictions and sentencing of up to 15 years under Michigan statute, for driving while intoxicated and operating a motor vehicle causing the death of another. The Supreme Court found that “specific intent is defined as a particular criminal intent beyond the act done, whereas general intent is merely the intent to perform the physical act itself” Id. In a strict liability crime the plaintiff has to prove only that the defendant performed the act, regardless of whether he intended to perform it or not. For a general intent crime, “the people merely need to prove that the defendant purposefully or voluntarily performed the wrongful act.”…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Trial Judge, Timothy DCJ found that Ms Chadwick was not contributorily negligent under Section 47(2)(b) of the Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA) (“the Act”) for taking the risk of travelling in the car driven by Mr Allen, whom she knew to be intoxicated. However, The Trial Judge did not accept that Ms Chadwick was prevented from fastening her seatbelt due to Mr Allen’s driving and found that she was 25 per cent contributorily negligent under s 49 of the Act. The matter went on appeal to the Full Supreme Court of South Australia. Mr Allen appealed seeking a 50 per cent reduction in damages pursuant to s47(2)(b) of the Act and in Ms Chadwick’s cross appeal she sought a zero per cent reduction on the s 49 issue.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jenner (Defendant) experienced an epileptic seizure while operating his vehicle that crashed into Maxine Hammontree (Plaintiffs) bicycle store causing her personal injuries and property damage to the shop owned by her. Plaintiff sued the defendant for negligence and total liability. However, the court rejected to impose absolute liability. The case was appealed by Los Angeles County Supreme Court. Facts: Jenner (Defendant) has had seizures in the past, but not since the DMV issued him a license to operate a motorized vehicle.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Closing Argument Peoples of the court, opposing counsel, your honor we are in court today because of the criminal negligence of the defendant, Gene Forrester which led to the involuntary manslaughter of the victim Phineas or Finny known by friends. Today the Prosecution has shown without a reasonable doubt that Gene Forrester is guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter refers to the unintentional killing that results from recklessness or criminal negligence. Criminal negligence occurs when the defendant should have been aware of the risk at hand and in Gene’s case the risk was evident. Gene stated that “ It was impossible to walk out on it far enough to be well over the river.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In criminal law, when a person commits an act or fails to act in a certain way, which results in death of another, the former may be charged with what is referred to murder. There are different classifications of homicide, referred to as degrees. There is first degree murder, in which case the circumstances clearly show a premeditated or aforethought intent to end the life of another which attracts a death sentence or life imprisonment. Second degree murder, is a lesser degree form of homicide. In this case, death occurs to a person, through commission of another act, causing death of another person, though in this case there is no intent to cause death (Mcphedran S & Baker J. 2012).…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the WA Court of Appeal a retrospective test has been adopted in order to establish causation. This test is called the “Operating or Substantial Cause Test”. I advise the prosecution to ask him/herself, was the accused’s act an operating or substantial cause of the damage. I advise the prosecution to argue that the substantial cause of death would be the push. Despite Hiro’s intoxication, the prosecution should argue that a normal person would still have suffered the same injuries.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal negligence manslaughter occurs when someone dies due to a high degree of negligence or recklessness. This crime can include examples similar to texting and driving, the use and abuse of alcohol, and even discharging a firearm. Many of these are unfortunately common crimes that happen in our society. In the book “Lord Of The Flies” by William Golding, all boys who crash landed on an island end up killing their friend Simon on an unfortunate night with lots of confusion and adrenaline.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Horizontal Gaze

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On 01-01-2017 at 0025 hours I was dispatched to Kinzer Street and 6th Street in reference to a motor vehicle accident. See accident report 2017-0001T Upon my arrival I made contact with Katie Clark, who was the driver of a 2001 Chrysler Sebring who started stating immediately her friends all told her not to driver. Clark advised me she had drunk a half of fifth of alcohol and that she should not have been driving. While speaking to Clark I could smell a strong odor of alcohol coming from Clark’s breath and she was crying and slurring her speech and stumbling. I had Clark step to the rear of the vehicle…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On one hand, John Locke believed that the state of nature is unsatisfactory, the government was therefore formed by social contract since people agree to transfer some of their rights to a centralized government in order to secure enjoyment of their properties. (Locke, 1764) Obviously, the formation of the American government is an example to illustrate Locke’s idea. The United States government derives its legitimacy and legal authority from the consent of the majority…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a defendant to be held accountable for involuntary manslaughter, the person doing that act has to be guilty of performing a dangerous act. An act is considered dangerous whereby any reasonable person would inevitably acknowledge that their actions would expose another person, to a degree of harm. This meaning of this element was given in the case of Church [1966] where the defendant knocked the victim semi-conscious. Thinking she was dead, the defendant covered up the evidence by throwing her body into a nearby river, where unfortunately the victim died of drowning. On appeal against the conviction, Lord Edmund Davies held that the defendant ‘deliberately threw the living body into the river which itself is an unlawful act and did not matter…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The states decides whether the crime or murder is classified as capital murder and are eligible for the death penalty. If two people get into an argument, and one ends up killing the other, that is not considered capital murder, this would be classified as "acquaintance murders". In this case it is assumed that there was some history between the murderer and the victim. The death of the victim wasn’t intentionally, in other words, there was a reason for the murderer to kill. Capital murder are defined as murders that were the victim was blameless, for example the victim was killed mainly because he/…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Euthyphro Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Murder” means, in a legal context, the killing of a human being by a sane and human with malicious intent (precising). In order to truly understand the definition of murder, it must be broken down into the two key components, malice and sanity, that differentiate murder from lesser crimes. First of all, it is important that the perpetrator has malicious intent when killing the victim. If there isn’t any malice involved, the crime is not as severe and would instead be classified as involuntary manslaughter or a different, lesser crime than murder. “Malicious” means malevolent (synonymous).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Homicide Essay

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Manslaughter can be voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary manslaughter can be seen as very similar to murder except in that voluntary manslaughter does not involve premeditation nor evil motivation. Voluntary manslaughter happens in the heat of the moment after adequate provocation—that is, provocation which is likely to cause a reasonable person to lose self-control for a small period of time. Voluntary manslaughter in popular culture is sometimes called ‘crimes of passion’. Examples include a person who shoots their spouse’s lover after coming home and discovering them in the act, individuals who shoots a person immediately after…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Negligence is conduct by an individual that drops below a reasonable standard of care and causes harm to another person. An individual has a duty to act reasonably when interacting with others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others, that individual is…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays