Chief Justice John Roberts Research Paper

Great Essays
Chief Justice John Roberts
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. The modern Supreme court is As envisioned in Article 3 of the constitution by the framers still the same, one of the 3 branches of government. It does play a more prominent role in our everyday lives than what the framers envisioned it. They gave the president, the White House, Congress, the Capitol and did not
…show more content…
Out of the 112 justices only 17 have been Chief justices, and John G. Roberts is our current chief justice. Chief justice John G.Roberts has prepared his entire life to become a Justice. Through most of his decisions from; District of Columbia v. Heller, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, and Obergefell v. Hodges, have shown how Chief Justice John Roberts stick to the attitudinal model rather than the rational choice theory. Even thought he has surprised some scholars in some decision further reinforcing my believe fiercely independent and personal approach to interpreting law. Chief justice John G. Roberts was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955. Was the only son of John G. "Jack" Roberts Sr. and Rosemary Podrasky Roberts, in 1959 they moved to Long beach, Indiana where him and his three siblings Kathy, Peggy, and Barbara went to Notre Dame Elementary School in Long Beach and then La Lumiere boarding school in La Porte, Indiana. Roberts was named captain of the high school football team because of his leadership skills. Roberts after graduating high school went to Harvard with …show more content…
Now with Chief Justice Roberts nomination as recently as 2005 it has still made impacts like the the previous courts have, but it is still premature to see what its “movement”will be, even though it has made already great steps with case like ; District of Columbia v. Heller, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, and Obergefell v. Hodges. we can see that when Bush reached into his John Roberts playbook to name a judicial conservative with impeccable credentials he picked a conservative, just like the father of Ideology when picking justices Regan did. John Roberts has stuck with his conservative thinking for a majority of the time and still now when people claim him to be more of a liberal after the Obama care decision, he still believes he is a conservative. this just further proves my point on him using his believes to interpret

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Democrats are opposed to this idea because of the fact the supreme court will be more in favor of Conservative views. This can have impact on things such as welfare, taxes, and other hot topics that the two parties tend to disagree on. All the Supreme court justices and nominees are well qualified to run this highly prestigious possession but the issue becomes regarding the party they are associated with. In my opinion if Judge Gorsuch is selected to be a supreme court justice we will only see changes in cases regarding issues that democrats and republics disagree but at the end of the day regarding other cases justice will be…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall served as chief judge from 1801 to 1835, and he was the greatest dominance to the Supreme Court that there was no judge can compare. At the outset of his tenure Judge, Supreme Court asserted its power by declaring an Act of Parliament was unconstitutional, that case was Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Marshall's decision in the dilemma seems no escape showed natural talent of his absolute. Marshall declared Section 13 of Act 1789 of Justice is unconstitutional because it empowered instance trial for the Supreme Court beyond the provisions in Article III of the Constitution. Thus, the power of the Supreme Court was reconsidered and decided the congressional legislation was unconstitutional had been set.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall’s Biography Being the first of fifteen children, John Marshall was already a natural leader. He was a soldier in the Revolutionary War, a successful lawyer, and secretary and most importantly Chief Justice of the United States of America. He was a well-respected man that played important roles throughout his life. A major influence in his teenage years was his father’s good friend, George Washington. John Marshall’s young inspirations, military background, and powerful government leadership led him to be an important figure in U.S. history.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates shared a commitment to an independent judiciary. People thought it would be good to have a co equal branch to serve alongside the legislative and executive branches.but delegates did not show up to philadelphia with a fully developed plan for the judicial branch. It has the ability to create courts, interpret the law,determining whether a specific law conforms to the Constitution,and applying the law to specific cases, typically ones that are disputed. john marshall became the fourth chief justice of the united states in 1801. A major influence in his life during the revolutionary war was george washington which was a close friend of marshalls.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennedy appointed Marshall to United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Four years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed Marshall as the United States Solicitor General. In 1967, Johnson successfully nominated Marshall to succeed retiring Associate Justice Tom C. Clark. Marshall retired during the administration of President George H. W. Bush, and was succeeded by Clarence Thomas. Marshall was born in Baltimore, Maryland, on July 2, 1908.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is stated that Thomas is “clearly on good terms with his colleagues, and is a beloved figure within the small world of Court personnel” (The Atlantic). However, he will continuously be known for his extremely conservative ideals, his unique path toward entering the Court, and his distinctive approach to the law. His legacy so far has been of surprises and his memoirs are detailed in his book titled My Grandfather’s Son. There has been question on whether Thomas is “evolving”, reducing his extreme conservative outlook; however, the morals of a conservative will likely remain intact. It has been said that “Thomas will probably leave the Court with the most conservative record in its history”…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although state laws are important, federal power was more essential for the Supreme Court decisions and the establishment of the primacy of the judiciary in determining the meaning of the Constitution. John Marshall was one of the most influential Supreme Court Chief of Justices in American history. He leaned towards Federalist views and favored a strong government, but most importantly, he established that the Judicial system held a final say whether an issue was constitutional and supported the sovereignty of federal power over state laws. In most of his cases, John Marshall asserted that Federal laws surpass state laws and claimed that the judiciary system of the Supreme Court had the power to state whether the acts of Congress were constitutional.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The name Warren court refers to the Supreme Court from years 1953 to 1969. The chief justice at the time was Earl Warren, who was known as the most outstanding 20th century leader of American politics and law. In 1953, Warren was appointed by President Eisenhower into the Supreme Court when Fred M. Vinson (previous chief justice) died. With his firm political background, having three terms as governor of California, appointing Earl Warren seemed to be one of Eisenhower’s greatest decisions.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law and Order Supreme Court justice could be called the most prestigious law job in America. Justices make some of the most important decisions for the United States, and once appointed they serve for life, or until they step down. Unfortunately, there is no definite time when a justice’s “life term” will come to an end, and Justice Antonin Scalia’s suddenly ended earlier this year. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died suddenly this year during a hunting trip in Texas at age 79. Scalia was an influential conservative justice in the Supreme Court, and his death leaves the court with a 4-4 split of democratic to republican justices.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays