Brian Nosek Replication Crisis Essay

Many of the studies that have been done in psychology have never been replicated. This has led to many doubts over the last handful of years about what psychological findings are reliable. Over the last couple years, this issue has come further into the limelight – becoming what is known today as the replication crisis. While for some people it seems rather obvious that the psychology discipline has an issue, others are standing up in defense of this field of sudy. After years of articles being published, but never replicated people started to get concerned about how reliable the results of these studies are. The biggest advocate for putting these results to the test is Brian Nosek. Nosek started the Reproducibility Project with close to 300 of his colleagues to attempt to reproduce about 98 studies. Out of those studies, …show more content…
These studies are people’s livelihoods. A large critic of the Replication Project is Daniel Gilbert. Gilbert feels that the project did not prove anything; “‘The paper provides no evidence whatsoever for a replication crisis…They drew an unrepresentative sample of studies, failed to ensure that replications were faithful and then misanalyzed their own data’” (Keats, 2016). His opinion is sure to be echoed by many other psychologists. No one wants to feel like they have been basing their life work off of these studies and findings when they may not actually hold any weight.
The replication crisis might be centered in psychology, but is by no means the only field that faces these issues. The light that has been shed in this area is important to for all areas of science to keep in mind for the future. Publications cannot only be interesting, but also have to be accurate. While it is understandable that researchers would rather study something new and interesting, it may be time to look to the past and check previous work before moving