The scholarly audience includes every detail you need to know. You learn about the background to the study, the study in actual depth, and the findings. The popular article only includes the highlights and the information that the average audience would find intriguing, even if it does not accurately represent the entire study. As I mentioned before, when research is translated into popular press, they use a title that is relatable to the average audience to draw them in. It does not include all of the relevant information in the article that you should know. A second problem is that you do not know all of the real results. The article gives you a one or two sentence summary of the findings. In a research article, you can see the instrumental value of the numbers in the findings, which can really help you understand the results of the study more. A third potential problem is that the author probably is not connected to the research in any way. They could be translating the research wrong, or not be providing us with the details that are truly important. All of these errors have the ability to shape our understanding of research in the wrong
The scholarly audience includes every detail you need to know. You learn about the background to the study, the study in actual depth, and the findings. The popular article only includes the highlights and the information that the average audience would find intriguing, even if it does not accurately represent the entire study. As I mentioned before, when research is translated into popular press, they use a title that is relatable to the average audience to draw them in. It does not include all of the relevant information in the article that you should know. A second problem is that you do not know all of the real results. The article gives you a one or two sentence summary of the findings. In a research article, you can see the instrumental value of the numbers in the findings, which can really help you understand the results of the study more. A third potential problem is that the author probably is not connected to the research in any way. They could be translating the research wrong, or not be providing us with the details that are truly important. All of these errors have the ability to shape our understanding of research in the wrong