Animal Farm Persuasion Analysis

Improved Essays
In life everybody around us take risks and use tactics, such as persuasion, to get what they want. Examples are right in front of our eyes; they are in places such as political campaigns, books, conversations, school, and many more. Animal Farm is an allegory, satire, and fable. This novel shows how the leaders during Russian Revolution use persuasion to convince their citizens to believe in them. This essay will be comparing Animal Farm to President Trump’s campaign speeches. The purpose of the political speeches is to win the presidency of the United States of America. President Trump uses persuasive techniques to make the citizens of America believe in him and to vote for him. Both of these texts portray a high use of persuasion, but the …show more content…
That is due to the convinced behavior of the animals in Animal Farm. For a point of time in the story, the animals believed that Napoleon was doing everything for the best of Animal Farm and not for himself. The animals all thought that Napoleon was working very hard and was sacrificing his life for them and the future generations. That was to be believed by the animals through the persuasion used by Squealer and Napoleon in Animal Farm. That is false, and evidence is shown in the novel itself. First of all, Clover always made somebody else reread the commandments because she didn’t believe Squealer or Napoleon. Secondly, the animals usually tried protesting in the story but were stopped by fear. Napoleon had many forms of fear, to keep control over the animals (the dogs, no rations, or more work). Since the protests didn’t take place, the doubts the animals had, didn’t become clear. That means that the animals followed Napoleon's rules through fear, not through free will or trust. Lastly, throughout the story, many persuasive techniques were portrayed, but many such as innuendo and ad hominem weren’t effective. That is because they didn’t impact or change the viewpoint of anybody. In the speeches of President Trump, the use of ad hominem and innuendo, it made everybody believe that Trump was a big deal (he was patriotic and the man for all). It convinced many to vote for him. In Animal Farm, even though all those persuasive techniques were used, many animals still didn’t believe in Napoleon. Some animals who did just consisted of Boxer (it took Boxer time to believe in Napoleon though) and Napoleon’s opportunist. Techniques such as ad hominem and innuendo were used better in Trump's speeches than in Animal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This challenges his beliefs and what the animals truly believe through his control Napoleon is able to implement the idea that he has power over manor farm, this of which is disregarded as a familiar…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Rough Draft To Jay Heinrichs, author of “Thank You for Arguing”, rhetoric is a persuasive essential; and while used in the art of influence, it provides an undeniable amount of credulous logic. The rhetoric used in the time frame of this book pertains to many political debates and presidential campaigns. Politicians need to use the tool of rhetoric to sway their audience’s opinion. The communication made from a speaker to an audience is illustrated dealing primarily with credibility, and the logic concerned with the writers argument; rhetoric is the most powerful argumentative tool.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Book about Rhetoric: is it Worth Reading? Jay Heinrichs is a New York Times best selling author thanks to his book, Thank You For Arguing; what Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach us about the Art of Persuasion . He is a leading expert in the study of persuasion and applies his knowledge of ethos, pathos, and logos to construct his position. Heinrichs also brings to play what he has learned from his 25 year long career as a journalist, as well as his lifelong study of rhetoric and applies it to his book.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us about the Art of Persuasion” made me realize how imperative arguing is to our everyday life. The book has been utilized in schools across the U.S for many years due to many readers, including myself finding Jay Heinrich’s cleverness and passion for rhetoric as an intriguing portal to the world of literature. Heinrichs has even been named “Professor of the Practice of Rhetoric and Oratory” at Middlebury College, and his book is also said to be one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard University. Throughout “Thank You for Arguing” Heinrichs effectively describes and demonstrates the different ways in which argument by character, logic, and emotion can act as powerful tools of persuasion, it is very well shown in chapter 4 and made me recognize how vital rhetoric is for us and our future generations.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Richard E. Neustadt, ‘The power of the American president is to persuade.’ I am going to analyse this statement in my essay, by answering why a president must persuade, looking at the relationship between the president and government, giving examples of when persuasion has worked and when it hasn’t, focusing on other ways the president can influence and finally ending with a conclusion. Firstly, why is it important for the president to persuade? The power to persuade is seen as an informal power as it is not clearly expressed in the constitution.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the last few months, I have read and annotated Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the Art of Persuasion by Jay Heinrichs. After being a journalist and publishing executive for 25 years, Heinrichs is now the professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Middlebury College in Vermont and travels the world as a presenter and persuasion expert. Published in 12 languages and 3 editions, Thank You For Arguing is a New York Times bestseller, along with being one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard. My analysis of Thank You For Arguing made me uncover the lost art of rhetoric, the steps in creating an excellent persuasive speech, and identifying the three methods of persuasion in everyday arguments.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Characters like Snowball and Napoleon use propaganda in their struggle for power over Animal Farm throughout the book. Snowball is a pig who lives at Animal Farm. He seems to have a true interest in improving the animals he lives with and commits his time into them in physical and mental…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once Major died the role of leadership went to Napoleon, Snowball, and Squealer. Snowball wants to listen to what the animals want by heart, but soon after Napoleon start getting vastly excited with the fact that all the animals had to go to his command. He had Squealer to back him but ahd the dogs to attack anyone that went against him. In the beginning of the books they stood by the 7 commandments, by about Chapter 9 and on, it was that the commandments are write to only about one rule that some animals are equal and some aren’t.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The perception Napoleon had with this shaped his actions because he felt powerful more than ever and it also shaped his decisions that were somewhat bad for Animal Farm. For example, Boxer knew that the things that were happening were not right but he did not want anything bad to happen to him so all he ever said was “I will work harder” and “Comrade Napoleon is always right”. With boxer saying this, a lot of the animals went along with even though some of them should have spoken up when things weren’t right at all. Another example is when the pigs started acting like humans pretty quickly once the power got to his head, the pigs started drinking, the pigs started sleeping in the farmhouse and in beds, and etc.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: Jay Heinrichs in the introduction to Thank You for Arguing “Open Your Eyes”, emphasizes how inescapable rhetoric is in everyday life as he proves the importance of rhetoric in daily livelihood. He supports his argument by observing that “We live in a dark world of persuasions.” (9). To further prove his point Heinrichs journals a his attempt of a day without persuasion of which he records that he could not even make it out of bed without being persuade to by his alarm clock. Hendricks further points out the effects of seduction in making a decision.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book we have a fake martyr. Napoleon gives his people the false sense that he is putting in the most work out of all the animals And squealer is helping convince them. He tells them that he is worried about the future of the animal farm and everything he does is for the farm. He pretends to be this selfless being. When in fact anything he does, he does for his personal benefits.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pigs began to treat the other animals as less than equal. All the best food and living conditions were reserved for the pigs, especially Napoleon. Napoleon trained the dogs (who represented the military/police) to be his guards. The pigs became more and more like royalty, while other animals had their work increased and their rations reduced. During these changes, Napoleon used Squealer (who represents the Russian media) to deceive the animals into believing all these changes were necessary to make Animal Farm…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon is a selfish, greedy and ambitious pig who can not endure share power with Snowball, thus, he opposed Snowball’s every suggestions and arguments due to stronger desire he have, he also killed other animals who did not support his idea and always contributed to contacting with the ‘’betrayer” Snowball. The sentences from novel “he pissed the blueprint of snowball’s plan for windmill” “If you have your lower animal to contend with,’’ he said, “we have our lower class!” and Mr.Pilkington once again congratulated the pigs on the low rations, the long working hours, and the general absence of pampering which he had observed on Animal farm (animal farm page 138). These kind of sentences vividly depict his ambitiousness reveal his rudeness to readers, Napoleon also reflect there a people like him in real world who believe they are noble and distinguished than others, some people always think they are different with other dominator, but finally they will being as same as “Mr. Jones”, betray primary principles and make friends with enemies, they do not work but just enjoy other’s labor fruits, they are absolutely…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This clearly makes him a villain because he is taking advantage of the rest of the animals just like Stalin did to his own people, especially the working class and those who were too ignorant to even realize he was abusing them. Napoleon represents the perfect villain in Animal Farm. He is manipulative, greedy,…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion In Ocean's 11

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When we communicate, not only do we want other people to understand the message, but also we try to affect their beliefs or actions by using persuasion. Communication always involves at least one message, transmitted by a source, via a medium, to a receiver, within a situational context (Simons, 1976). Persuasion is a way of communication to influence other people to make them to do actions, pursue goals that they would have not otherwise. It differs from other ways to influence for three reasons: (1) it does not imply the use of force, but makes an appeal to the person’s free choices; (2) it claims that the goal or action proposed by the persuader is in the interest of the person being persuaded, and (3) it aims at influencing through communication…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays