• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

No counterintuitive consequences

Implications of counting all pleasures as equal eradicated with the differentiation between higher and lower pleasures

Rationality

Rests on a personal calculation of no if people who's pleasure or happiness is maximised

Common sense

Fit with our common sense view of morality makes sense that are moral worth should be attributed to some pleasure more than others, rule utilitarianism argues we should generally follow practical rules rather than act which is as the situation demands it

Equality

Everyone is equally weighted in the judgement as Bentham proposed, Mill adds equal rights

Predicting the future

Requirement when making decisions about morality, the future changes so it is very difficult, consequences are hard to predict

Elitist

Only a competent judge, the intellectual man is capable of making decisions about morality. But this implies only the most educated man can be moral because they have experienced the best things in life

Ignores special responsibility

Eg if there was only one space left in the life boat and there was a man with an HIV cure and your son, utilitarianism would say save the man because he could cure the most people, but most would save the son

Predicting the future

Issues of climate change, famine, war all suggest we need an ethical theory to take into account those yet unborn