Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
8 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
why particular research methods are used at the social cultural level of analysis. Name 4 studies.
|
Laboratory experiments:
Tajfel (boys split into groups based on dot estimation Asch (line experiment) Simmel (moving figures - attribution theory) Participant observation: Festinger (UFO cult - covert natural observation) |
|
|
Ethical considerations related to research studies at the sociocultural level of analysis. Name 4 studies.
|
Milgram
Zimbardo Genie Steele and Aronson |
|
|
Two errors in attribution. Name 5 studies.
|
Fundamental attribution error.
Jones and Harris (estimate the true opinion of a target person) Lee. (the game show) Suedfeld (holocaust surviver) Illusory correlation: Chapman (clinicians observer draw-a-person test Denis Hilton (2011) judgement of two groups change depending on training. |
|
|
Social identity theory. Mention 4 studies
|
Tajfel (boys split into groups based on dot estimation
Lalonde (Ice hockey team) Cialdini (university students more likely to wear insignia) Howard (brixon girls favored their own city) |
|
|
Compliance techniques. Mention 6 studies.
|
Reciprocity:
Lynn and McCall - larger tip if given a sweet Tiger and fox - evolutionary explanation for reciprocity Regan - cola experiment Foot in the door: Dickerson - save water in dormitory Pallak - save energy in household Ting Toomey - collectivistic vs. individualistic. |
|
|
Conformity to group norms. Mention 4 studies.
|
Jennes - estimate beans in a glass
Sheriff - used the autokinetic effect Asch - line experiment Perrin and spencer - replicated line experiment with engineers |
|
|
Factors influencing conformity. Mention 6 studies.
|
Ach: Group size, unanimity, confidence.
Perrian and spencer: british engineers Sang: High self-esteem Bond and Smith: cultural variations. collect 35% individual 25% Moscobici: minority influence Hogg and Vaughan: 3 reasons why minority might influence |
|
|
The role of two cultural dimensions on behavior. mention 5 studies
|
Hofstede - IBM survey focused on power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity.
Markus and kitaya: ingroup bias of American football players and Japanese Yuki: different between trust in cultures Masculinity/femininity: Meritt and Helmreich - correlation between power distance and autopilot use. Malcolm gladwell outliers - plain crash. |
