Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
"Love thy neighbour" |
Donoghue v Stevenson |
|
Car dealers are now included, doesn't have to be from the manufacturers |
Andrews v Hopkinson |
|
Passer-by's are now included |
Brown v Cotterill |
|
Repairers of a vehicle owe a duty to the public |
Stennett v Hancock |
|
Builders owe a duty too |
Bowen v Paramount |
|
People who are unforseeable that are effected means no liability for the defendent |
Palsgraf v Long Island |
|
res ipsa loquitur |
the facts speak for themselves |
|
There was a red flag from the council to the builders, therefore negligence is present |
Bowen v Paramount Builders |
|
Intermediate examination was not possible because of opaque bottle |
Donoghue v Stevenson |
|
Plaintiff can rely on expertise of a car dealer for example |
Andrews v Hopkinson |
|
If intermediate examination does occur, then it has to highlight the defect |
Hershtal v Stewert and Adern Ltd |
|
Jull v Wilson and Horton and Another. What is their rule? |
- One must disclose the true nature of the defect - Give warning of the danger - Place a time limit on use |
|
Common knowledge not to eat raw sausage |
Yachetti v Duff |
|
What is the rule on time limit? |
Building Act 2004 & Limitations Act 1950
Liability ends six years after the first cause of action, however the six year rule restarts after every new and distinct damage. |
|
What are the four elements to address for D v S |
Negligence Duty of Care Limits on Liability Damages |