Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
16 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
what is a confession |
a statement against interest by the accused |
|
hearsay |
what said by any person outside of the court |
|
Harley v Hm Adv |
confessions presumed to be true |
|
basic test of admissibility |
Brown v HM Adv if unfairly obtained, inadmissible |
|
fairness to public and accused case |
MilN v Cullen |
|
Unfairness 1 the lack of a caution |
depends on stage |
|
when do you need caution |
Tonge v Hm Adv need to do before charge, when suspect yes but test is till fairness |
|
Unfairness 2 when is unfairly obtained |
lack of access to legal advice Art 6 requires it Ambrose v Harris manner of questioning bullying, Lord adv reference 1984 intoxication other impairment Thomson v Hm Adv, but if it appears he understands what he is saying physical condition Malory v Machines not fully awake |
|
contd |
suspects age Cardona v Hm Adv language difficulties Hm adv v Ollson |
|
3 Eavesdropping by Police |
if intentionally place together, inadmissible HM ADV V higgins |
|
Jamison v Annan |
generally admissible overheard saying he did it |
|
required by statute to answer a question |
LIEK ROAD TRAFIICA CT, WHO WAS DRIVING AT THE TIME can still be unfairly obtained Styr v Hm aDV |
|
mixed statements |
statement by accused outside of court with both incriminating and exculpatory |
|
case on this |
McCUTCHEON V hm Adv sets out main rules |
|
main tules |
general rule hearsay not admissible thus if relied on, only for purpose of showing say attitude however if crown leads evidence on incriminating, defence can lead evidence |
|
determining admissibility |
thompson v crowe, up to court balance |