Corrections Quiz 2

Front 1

static factors

Back 1

CriminalHistory

Prior supervision

Front 2

dynamic factors

Back 2

- things that can be altered

-Education,attitude, cognitive thinking, associatesCanchange Criminogenic

Front 3

risk is determined by

Back 3

combining risk and static factors

Front 4

dynamic factor identification and analysis

Back 4

Employment,Family/Marital, Substance Abuse, Social Interaction , Community Functioning,Personal/Emotional and Attitude

Front 5

proper case management is

Back 5

structureand supervision required while addressing needsBalancerehabilitative needs with community safety Preparefor reintegrationContributeto effective community supervision

Front 6

correctional plan

Back 6

Not applicable to short sentencesIncludes: Initial institutionalplacement, specific training or work opportunities and release plan Based upon risk/ needs profileGuides all decisions made

Front 7

RNR assumptions

Back 7

A.Interventionbenefits community and offender

B.Compassionate,Collaborative and dignified human service interventions targeting predictors

C.Rehabilitationsourced by government

Front 8

RNR

Back 8

Risk, Need and Responsivity

Front 9

risk includes

Back 9

Attitudes,values and beliefsRationalizationsand cognitive emotional statesProblemsolving, self management and impulsivity Bothstatic and dynamic included

Front 10

principles of effective correctional treatment: risk

Back 10

Match risk

Level of intervention must matchrisk

Possible to cause more damage

little impact on low risk

Front 11

risk , need and responsivility weakness

Back 11

1.LacksSimplicity

2.Lacksexplanatory ability – Responsivity

3.OffenderMotivation

4.Wantfor change

Front 12

Level of service inventry revised has

Back 12

Actuarial Assess Criminogenic Needs Understandoffender attributeAid indecisions about riskPredictive ofparole success and recidivism Makedetermination about treatment

Front 13

social learning theory

Back 13

Criminalbeahaviouris learned behaviourCriminalbehaviouris learned in the same way as all other behaviourBehaviourresults from an interaction

Front 14

static factors

Back 14

Criminal History Previous Supervision

Front 15

dynamic factors

Back 15

Education/EmploymentAccommodationsFamily/MaritalLeisure/RecreationAlcohol/DrugProblemPersonal/EmotionalOrientation Attitude

Front 16

LSI-R predictors of criminal behaviour

Back 16

Anti-social perceptions Anti-Social associates A history of Anti-social behaviourAnti-social personality

Front 17

LSI-R questionaing and scoring

Back 17

54 itemsQuestions asked organicallyPoints and tally Risk/Need level and likelihood ofrecidivism Areas for treatment determined byscores in each of the dynamic areas

Front 18

classifying an anti social personallity pattern you use : techniques of neutralization

Back 18

DenyResponsibility DenyInjury Blamethe victim Condemnthe condemnersAppealto a higher loyalty

Front 19

anti social personality pattern

Back 19

StaticCriminal History Lifestyle thatexploits othersChildhoodbehaviour issues and offending Short termintimate relationships Revocation ofparole Diversity inoffending

Front 20

dynamic criminogenic factors

Back 20

Pathological lyingManipulation Lack of remorse or guilt Behaviourcontrols Promiscuous sexual relationshipsLack of long term goals(Realistic) Impulsivity Irresponsibility Do not accept responsibility

Front 21

responsivity concerns

Back 21

Disingenuous and superficialcharm Significant sense of self-worth Need for stimulation and prone toboredom Shallow affect

Front 22

federal treatment programs

Back 22

LifeskillsViolenceprevention SubstanceAbuseFamilyviolenceLiteracyand Education Sexoffender Psychologicaland psychiatric counselling

Front 23

integrated correctional program model

Back 23

Interdisciplinary Multi-Target, Sex Offender,Aboriginal Best practice of previousprogramsHolistic with multiple modulesBased upon Good Lives Model andRisk, Need, Responsivity Still based upon risk

Front 24

program integrity

Back 24

– designed and deliver byqualified person, and they adhere to program and are monitored

Front 25

professional discretion

Back 25

consider risk, need and responsivity

Front 26

robert martinson ( 1974)

Back 26

200programs“nothingworks”Martinson (1979) reevaluated –some treatment worksDirect treatment more likely toreduce recidivism compared to incarceration Risk, needs cognitive behavioral

Front 27

conditional release for the parole board

Back 27

Protection of society primary

Consider all information;sentencing judge, assessments, victim and offender

Can enhance its effectiveness bysharing information with other criminal justice agencies, and by ensuring thatinformation on policies and programs is communicated to offender, victim andpublic

Front 28

section 102 CCRA

Back 28

May grant parole to an offenderif, in its opinion: a)The offender will not, by reoffending,present an undue risk to society before their sentence expires

b)Release facilitates the offendersreintegration as law abiding citizens

Front 29

types of conditional release

Back 29

1.Paroleeligibility dates, day or full parole2.“Dischargepossible date”2/3 of sentence3.WarrantExpiry

Front 30

temporary absence

Back 30

escorted or unescorted

Front 31

day parole

Back 31

one sixth of the sentence

Front 32

full parole

Back 32

one third of the sentence

Front 33

remission / discharge PROVINCAL ONLY

Back 33

two thirds

Front 34

statutory release ( federal)

Back 34

2 thirds

Front 35

cold turkey release

Back 35

Released without conditionsProvincialdischarge at two thirds pointFederal warrant expiry date

Front 36

high potential

Back 36

low or no programs

Front 37

medium potential

Back 37

programs, community programs

Front 38

low potential

Back 38

intensive programming , cautoius considereation

Front 39

PBC and day parole

Back 39

Eligible at 1/6 or six months,which ever is longerAccelerate Parole Review (APR) Most live in Community BasedResidential Facilities or Community Correctional CentresApply for full parole at 1/3Aids in transition, short termoption before full parole

Front 40

PBC and full parole

Back 40

Most common form of releaseLives at home with family,friends or independently FP is calculated at 1/3 of thesentence or seven years, which ever is less. Sentencing judge can impose thatthe offender serve half their sentence, but never more than 10yrs

Front 41

statutory release

Back 41

Occurs when offender serves 2/3of their sentenceNot applied for parole Denied parole Release revokedSubject to parole supervisionuntil warrant expiry Extremely common 36%