Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
43 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Offer Basic |
Moran v Salford Gibson v Man City Council |
|
Invitation To treat |
Clifton v Palumbo (ITT) Minister for Industry & Commerce v Pimm Bros Pharma society v boots |
|
Advertisements |
Partridge v Crittendon Guilford v Lockyer Leonard v Pepsico |
|
Unilateral |
Carlill Leftowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus |
|
Auctions |
Harris v Nickerson Warlow v Harrison |
|
Tenders |
Spencer v Harding Harvela Investments v Royal Trust of Canada Howberry Lane v Telecom Eireann Smart Telecom v RTE |
|
Acceptance |
Acceptance or Counter Offer? Swan v Miller Wheeler v Jeffrey |
|
Implied Acceptance |
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway |
|
Battle of Forms |
Butler machine tool v Excel O corp Chicester Joinery v John Molam |
|
Communication |
Tinn v Hoffman (Equally expedient) Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp Brinkibon Felthouse v Brindley ( Horse, Silence) Russel & Baird v Hoban (Oatmeal, Silence) |
|
Postal Rule |
Adams v Lindsell Dooley v Egan Kelly v Cruise Catering Holwell v Hughes (Letter never arrived) Byrne v Van Tienhoven |
|
Intention to Create Legal Relations |
Edmunds v Lawson Balfour v Balfour Courtney v Courtney Jones v Padvatton Haggar v DePlacido |
|
Commercial Agreements |
O'Rourke v Talbot Ireland Edwards v Skyways Rose and Frank v Crompton |
|
Letters of Comfort |
Klienworth Benson v MMC Banque Brussels Lambert AC Controls v BBC |
|
Industrial Relations |
Ford v AUEFW Ardmore Studios v Lynch Goulding Chemicals v Bolger |
|
Misrepresentation |
Derry v Peek Hedley & byrne v Heller Wales v Wadham Esso Petroleum v Marsden Bissett v Wilkonson Smith v Chadwick Attwood v Small Gill v McDowell |
|
Uberrimae Fides |
Chariot Inns Aro Road Land Vehicles Kelleher v ILAC |
|
Equitable Remedy |
Hop and Malt Exchange Leaf v National Gallery Seddon v North Eastern Salt Vigers v Pike |
|
Consideration |
Hawkes v Saunders Eastwood v Kenyon Re JR (home for life) |
|
Sufficient |
Thomas v Thomas Chappel & Co v Nestle Co O'Neill v Murphy |
|
Statutory Duty |
England v Davidson Glassbrook v Glamorgan Harris v Sheffield UTD |
|
Contractual Duty |
Stilk v Merick |
|
Pinnels Case |
Folkes v Beer Hartley v Ponsonby Williams v Roffey Brothers |
|
3rd Party |
Eurymedon Bennett Construction v Green Central London Properties Trust v High Trees |
|
Past Consideration |
Re Mc Ardle McEvoy v Belfast Banking Corp |
|
Privity
|
Tweddle v Atkinson (Father in Law)
Dunlop v Selfridge Eurymedon Hearn & matchroom Boxing v Collins |
|
Legislation |
Married Womens status Act Road Traffic Act Package Holidays Act |
|
Collateral warranty |
Shanklin Pier v Detel Products Cadbury Ireland v Kerry Co Op & Bord Bainne |
|
Formalities |
Statute of Frauds 1695 Guardian Builders v Patrick Kelly Black v Grealy Casey v Irish Intercontinental Bank McQuaid v Lynham & lynham |
|
Subject to Contract |
Kelly v Park Hall School Mulhall v Haran Boyle v Lee |
|
Part Performance |
Equitable Doctrine Lowry v Reid Steadman v Steadman |
|
Discharge |
Performance Breach Frustration |
|
Development
|
Neville & sons v Gurdian Builders (Access Rd, cited in Ireland)
Gamble v Accident Insurance Company Taylor v Caldwell (Music Hall) Robinson v Davidson (Pianist) |
|
Unavailability of essential item |
Irish Leisure Industries v Gaeity Theatre National Carriers v Panalpina Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC Krell v Henry Herne Bay Steam Boat v Hutton |
|
Written into Contract |
Brown v Mulligan Herman v SS Vicia |
|
Remedy |
Chandler v Webster (Another coronation room) Fibrosa v Fairbain Lawson Combe Barber (Poland) |
|
Law Reform |
Frustrated Contracts Act 1943 |
|
Illegal & Void |
Shaw v Groom Murphy & Co v Crean Whitecross Potatoes v Coyle |
|
Restraint of Trade |
Finnegan v JE Davy Esso Petroleum v Harpers Irish Shell v Elm Motors John Orr Ltd v John Orr Foster & son v Sugget faccenda Chicken v Fowler House of Spring Gardens v Point Blank Clark v Newland Murgatroyd v Purdy Mackin v O'Reilly |
|
Blue Pencil |
Attwood v Lamont Skerry Wynne v Moles |
|
Capacity |
Age of Majority Act 1985 Chappel v Cooper (Defined Basics) Nash v Inman Skrine v Gordan (Horse, Stag hunting) |
|
Minors |
Toronto Marlboro Hockey Club v Tonnelli Doyle v White City Stadium |
|
Mental Capacity |
Collins v Mays Eforceable by person lacking Did not understand Other person must know of deficiency |