Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
13 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Mapp v ohio |
Exclusionary rule, fruit of the poisonous tree |
|
|
South dakota v opperman |
Inventory searches of vehicles |
|
|
Arizona v gant |
Vehicle searches incident to arrest |
|
|
People v barrow |
Express waiver in writing from juvenile and parents prior to interrogation of juvenile if parents are not present |
|
|
Mincey v arizona |
Once exigency has past, officers must attain a warrant to continue search |
|
|
Us v carol |
Officer can search entire vehicle and contents based in probable cause |
|
|
Us v ross |
PC to search vehicle means you can search containers |
|
|
Maryland v Wilson |
Right to remove passengers of vehicle for officer safety |
|
|
Pennsylvania v mimms |
Right to remove driver of vehicle for officer safety |
|
|
Us v katz |
Right to privacy in home during searches |
|
|
Us v robinson |
Full search of a person incident to arrest at a traffic stop |
|
|
Chimel v california |
Police can search the immediate area of a driver, wingspan rule |
|
|
Payton v new york |
Need search warrant to arrest someone inside their home when no exigency exists |
