Analysis Of Morgenthau's Realist Perspective

Improved Essays
MORGENTHAU’S PERSPECTIVE
Morgenthau puts national interest-defined power in the center of his analysis. One of his frequently cited thoughts: "The main signpost that helps political realism find its way through the landscape of international politics is the concept of interest defined in terms of power" (Morgenthau, 1978). According to his view, national interest and power are very closely connected.

For Morgenthau, domestic politics and international affairs are separate realms that require different tools. Beliefs and values of decision-makers might be important in domestic politics, but Morgenthau assumes that the international environment employs sufficient compulsion on its members, which means that their behavior is usually not significantly affected by their internal characteristics. Although it does not match with the well-established realist view, Morgenthau underlines a vital function of diplomacy.

In the last chapter of Politics Among Nations, he explains that rather than pursuing expansion of
…show more content…
His central insight in the 1978 paper “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” was that “many of the means by which a state tries to increase its security decrease the security of others.” For instance, U.S.-South Korea joint military exercises are designed to increase those countries’ security, but North Korea sees them as decreasing its own. American missile defenses on the Korean peninsula, meant to blunt the threat of the North’s missiles, have radars that look to China make Korea seems like they could help America spy on China’s own weapons, threatening Beijing’s ability to defend itself (Gilsinan, 2017). As he concluded his thought, “the basic thing about the security dilemma is that when it comes to their security, even normal states are a bit

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Pros Of Constructivism

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, her ideas of expansion were altered. According to certain views, expansionism did not change in the late nineteenth-century to the early twentieth-century while others viewed expansionism to have stayed the same. Foreign countries continued to broaden their horizons and colonize other places, and as the United States grew in power, it began to act likewise. An old concept idealised by the American people was Manifest Destiny.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abdallah Assaf Pols 281 Floros Robert Neus Analysis Robert Neus a US Consular and the Diplomat in Residence for the Midwest, who’s taken various tours worldwide, emphasized a few things when speaking to our Political Science 281 United States Foreign Policy class. Some of the thing he emphasized were diversity in regards to the people that the state department employs to represent the United States abroad, involvement in political and social issues overseas despite popular demand to be reclusive and the reach of the US State department when dealing with different bureaus under their control. One of the biggest things people are concerned about in the United States today is security, we have threats all around the planet from the Middle East…

    • 1326 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soviet Union Dbq

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He also stated, “The Soviet government will never be easy to ‘get along with’” (Clifford, 1946). He advocated that the United States needed to be prepared to join forces with other countries to create a world where all could coexist without conflict. However, he warned that the Soviet Union would have to be recognized as their own ‒ one who would not cooperate with any other countries, and one who should not be engaged in combat. He ended this memorandum by concluding the United States should not start a war with the Soviet Union, but they should be prepared to defend themselves.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The notion of perimeter defense, absconded by Kennan, was of the first mandates, as the need to protect peripheral interests was seen as equally as important as protecting vital interests, due to the effects of the domino theory, in that “psychological insecurity could as easily develop from the distant sound of falling dominoes as from the rattling of sabers next door.” In contrast to Kennan’s theory of containment, NSC-68 viewed maintaining control over territory in a higher regard than protecting key areas of infrastructure and industry, another area of divergence from Kennan. This change in priority necessitates the change in policy from focusing on a few key countries, to protecting all friendly nations: Nitze et al were of the opinion that every nation lost was an enemy made, and with enough losses, the odds were raised “that no coalition adequate to confront the Kremlin with greater strength could be…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Korean War Dbq

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Brown 1 The Korean War was just the start of increased tension between the United States and the Soviet Union. After WWII the international system quickly made a shift from multipolar system to a bipolar system, involving the two remaining super powers. The Primary goal for the U.S and U.S.S.R, or any state, was survival. The only way to achieve this goal was to increase their power.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cold War DBQ

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He calls out the U.S for their misuse of power. He brings attention on America taking advantage of countries they do not care about just to push their political agendas. They had no real interest in helping Korea with its civil war, but since he Soviet Union was involved they had to be too. This happened in countless other places as well. America got involved in China, Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba in spite of communism.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed it was necessary for “Americans to accept the consequences [of nuclear warfare], no matter how horrifying” (Symonds 1). With the developing arms race in the Middle East and North Korea the American population must be prepared to launch into nuclear warfare at any moment otherwise “without the willingness to push the button, nuclear war preparations [are] just an elaborate bluff” (Symonds 1). Power and its use has been a controversial topic throughout human existence (Symonds 1-3). If those who hold power are not responsible, the world will remain on the verge of total destruction. Global conflict can be avoided, but the longing for control can bring an end to everything society once…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Motives For Imperialism

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A country’s thirst for power, which is the ability to control people, has always been great. To achieve the goal of becoming the best and most powerful country there is. To be able to control people like puppets, and when the country becomes strong and powerful imperialism occurs. The stronger country takes advantage of the weaker country and dominates them either socially, economically, and politically, if not all.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberalism In Iraq

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nick Sherman Professor Asal Political science 102 9/27/16 In the wake of 9/11 The United States, The United Kingdom, and many other nations formed a coalition against the Ba’athist regime of Saddam Hussein. The coalition force invaded in 2003 to overthrow Saddam’s dictatorship and establish a democratic state in the Middle East. Although in some instances realism can describe the invasion of Iraq, the theory of Liberalism best describes the invasion because of liberal notions such as collective security and the belief that cooperation can lead to beneficial outcomes to all involved.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although Booth also explores this theme at the start of his article, his analogy of this traditional approach is rather disparate. Booth assumes that prior to the end of the Cold War, the main concern of security studies was based and focused on inter-state war and the deployment of weapons . Similar to the argument of Walt, Booth states that traditional security has been characterized by the three elements of military threats and counter threats, status quo, and state centrism . Consequently, Booth shifts and differs immensely from Walt, with a much more reasonable and relevant argument. Booth believes that although this was a well-focused part of the study of security, ever since the Cold-War has ended, the modern era has seen the decline in inter-state war, and the fact that will only fight if they or…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historians and International Relations scholars have long had a relationship that allows for interworking, while distinct differences still remain separating the two. In studying the past, a historian and an international relations scholar would take into account the past as a force that generates the questions and theories of both parties. On the other hand, there lies a difference in the way that the historian would place more emphasis on recounting history and international events for their own sake. The IR scholars would contrastingly use historical events as ways to additionally supporting or discrediting a theoretical hypothesis they have proposed. In this way, their differences in methodology and objectives can be highlighted.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By first examining the history of the famous Melian Dialogue, then applying the positive, realist theories of Thucydides and Weber, then contrasting these theories with Kant’s normative, cosmopolitan beliefs, this fundamental issue of international relations - the Melian Dialogue - can be utilized to further examine the possibility of ethical action in the world of nation states, leading to the conclusion that, while ideal, cosmopolitanism does not exist as a realistic option in international affairs due to the win-lose attitude seen in societies. Throughout the Dialogue accounts of realism are consistently illustrated while cosmopolitan beliefs never come to fruition, supporting the claim that realism exists as a genuine way of handling altercations between states while cosmopolitanism demonstrates a utopian model building towards world peace yet unobtainable due to the static nature of the world, held in place by those in power, refusing to relinquish their…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays