Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
24 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same circumstances
|
Negligence
|
|
What are the four elements of negligence?
|
1. Duty of Care
2. Breach of duty 3. Causation 4. Damages |
|
For a plaintiff to win a negligence case against a defendant, each of the four elements must be proven by ___________.
|
A preponderance of evidence
|
|
The defendant, or accused wrongdoer, owed a duty of care (reasonable care) to the plaintiff or injured person
|
Duty of Care
|
|
List at least five examples of duty of care.
|
Examples of Duty of Care:
Automobile drivers have a duty of care to … Other drivers, cyclists, pedestrians, driving safe for conditions What about police involved in a car chase Doctors to patients Homeowners to visitors Schools to students Parks, amusement parks, museums to public |
|
What is the name of the imaginary character created by law to judge negligence cases?
|
The “reasonable person of ordinary carefulness”
|
|
What are the 3 items that the reasonable person considers when looking at a negligent act?
|
1. How likely a certain harm is to occur
2. How serious would the harm be if it occurred 3. What would be involved (the cost) in avoiding the harm |
|
Occurs when the defendant’s conduct breached or violated that duty of care
|
Breach of Duty
|
|
What percentage of all law suits involving negligence actually go to court to be resolved?
|
Answer: 1 %
99% of all negligence lawsuits do not go to court because the defendant usually has insurance coverage that pays off the plaintiff |
|
Are you responsible for the negligent conduct of your party guests?
|
Parties – generally not responsible for the conduct of your guests unless you over serve them
|
|
The reason an event occurs; that action or inaction which produces the negligence
|
Causation
|
|
If the harm would not have occurred without the wrongful act, the act is ____________.
|
Cause in fact
|
|
Exists when the link between the negligent conduct and the injury is strong enough to be recognized by the law.
|
Proximate Cause
|
|
To determine if proximate cause exists, courts use the ________.
|
foreseeability test
|
|
The court asks whether the injury to the victim was foreseeable at the time
|
Foreseeability Test
|
|
The injuries or losses suffered by one person due to the fault of another
|
Damages
|
|
What is the basic idea behind damages?
|
The basic idea behind damages is that the plaintiff should be restored to his/her pre-injury condition, to the extent that this can be restored with money
|
|
What are the 3 main defenses to negligence?
|
1. Contributory Negligence
2. Comparative Negligence 3. Assumption of Risk |
|
A defense against negligence whenever the defendant can show that the victim did something that helped cause (contributed to) their own injuries no matter how small a mistake
|
Contributory Negligence
|
|
The negligence of each party is compared and the amount of money a plaintiff can recover is reduced by the percent of his/her negligence
|
Comparative Negligence
|
|
With regard to the "comparative negligence defense," what is the 50% rule?
|
“50% Rule” (used by most states) - If the plaintiff’s negligence is greater than the defendant’s negligence , then the plaintiff cannot recover any damages
|
|
A claim made by a defendant against a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit
|
Counterclaim
|
|
A defense used against negligence that is raised when the plaintiff knew of the risk involved and still took the chance of being injured
|
Assumption of Risk
|
|
Can people who participate in extreme sports file negligence lawsuits?
|
NO
|