This statement relates to the hypothesis 2 which asserts charismatic individuals can have an enormous influence on the extent to which education research finds its way into education practice (Porter & McMaken, 2009). These types of impacts are often aided by influential advocates. To further drive their ideas, the politicians can have the endorsement of developments of research based programs and testing program put into production and through the research, a plan can be implemented. In hypothesis 1, it declares that for educational research at the instructional level to find its way into practice, major development efforts are typically necessary (Porter & McMaken, 2009). Subsequently, all this research is at a much elevated level beyond what a school or individual teacher could generate. At the classroom level, the professional teacher can research through an action plan form. Indeed, this research would provide information to assist the immediate classroom practices. Although, it would be less rigorous, it would be a compilation of a data collection, as well as information concerning the data’s results (Lauer, 2006). This would be advantageous to the teacher, to solve a problem in the classroom or a student concern that they are looking to alleviate. Consequently, these findings …show more content…
In this case, through the education research, reforms can be put into play. Hypothesis 4 avows reforms that look easy from a distance and may have many advocates may not include effects on student achievements, although it could have large effects on educational practice (Porter & McMaken, 2009). Do teachers want to wait for reforms to change the running of the classroom when these might have nothing to do with student achievement? Teachers are tuned in to student achievement, trying to get these scholastic achievers to work towards their fullest potential. A perfect example of a reform for a school initiative is technology reform. Hypothesis 5 discusses potential education technology reforms that get hindered when it requires educators to invent fundamental new ways of doing their work without any motivational stimuli (Porter & McMaken, 2009). Teachers are already manipulating students and curriculums to accommodate the ongoing mandated rules of the school district. Curriculum lessons that must get taught, state tests that must be givens, assessments that students must take and lesson plans to complete, Child Study Team meeting to attend, professional development hours to attain to name a few teacher responsibilities. And now with a technology reform, we must accommodate the onlookers to fit in a technology reform appropriately without proper