New Hampshire Supreme Court

Heffron is similar to our case, because both the regulation in Heffron and our ordinance place restrictions on where individuals are permitted to engage in solicitation. In determining the content neutrality of the regulation in Heffron, the court held that the restriction was content-neutral because it was not intended to silence one particular message and was not an attempt to regulate ideas because the regulation applied evenhandedly to all who wished to engage in solicitation, regardless of…

workers on the production line would very well be, soon on the way. The US economy had slowed tremendously and the Pentagon was now warning of declining military preparedness. This couldn’t be any worse timing because of the country heading into the new election year. A federal law called the Taft-Harley act that passed in the senate in 1947, gave the government enormous loads of power to use over the activities in the Labor Unions . In other things, it also gave allowance of the President to…

Scout was suspended following allegations of being homosexual and an activist championing for the rights of the gay people. Later on, James, filed a case against his dismissal, claiming that, the Boy Scouts of America Association was violating The New Jersey law is in place against biasness based on one’s sexual lifestyle in places that are meant for public works. The defendant argued that Eagle Scout is a private, non-profit organization, based on moral principles and hence homosexuality was a…

ARGUMENT 1: The results of legal court cases allow women to receive appropriate behaviour and equality in the workplace. Fact : In 1999, a legal case between the Public Service Employee Relations Commission and British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union took place. In British Columbia, the provincial government had decided that a (minimum) physical fitness test was to be taken in order to be a forest fighters, and it included an aerobic standard. Rubin, a female forest fighter…

What happened in this case was that the school believed that drugs were being sold on school grounds. They believed this due to students telling them this and giving names. They searched what I believe to be is two girls. Savana however, is the main person. Her parents made a claim against the school district stating that her daughter’s fourth amendment right was violated. This is because the school made her do a strip search to see if drugs were hidden in places that they could not touch…

limited jurisdiction. This would consist of local, municipal, and Justice Courts. These courts tend to handle local matters and municipal violations. Municipal courts also handle a lot of misdemeanor violations of state law that took place within their jurisdiction. Justice Courts oversee a broad range of civil cases as well as hold preliminary hearings for many felony cases. Level 2 is the Superior Court. The Superior Court is able to oversee most cases within Arizona. Felonies, large lawsuits,…

Rhetorical Analysis I will be analyzing, "The Supreme Court Says Again: Juveniles Are Different”, a 7 paragraph article written by the Editorial Board and published to the New York Times on January 25, 2016. In discussions of The Supreme Court’s repeated ruling over the last decade, it has become a controversial issue that it is morally and constitutionally wrong to equate offenses committed by emotionally undeveloped adolescents with crimes carried out by adults. While some argue that no…

The issue of equality based on race has given people a plagued view of America since its existence, and this issue of race does not stop when it comes to college admission. In 2003, a case known as Grutter v. Bollinger came in front of the Supreme Court and challenged the constitutional protection or lack of on an affirmative action plan adopted by an university. Grutter deals with the role the state plays in including a minority group into a larger part of the schools student body for…

Jordan's quote, we would end up with one common view between them. Brennan and Jordan both believe that we don’t have to agree with the decision of those that surround us, but we must accept them. The action on acceptance allows a person to welcome new ideas, an array of view on certain propositions, and fluent mindset when it comes to social issues around…

case, Donald Marshall, was a Mi’Kmaq Indian who was charged with three offences found in the federal fishery regulations: Fishing without a license, selling eels without a license, and fishing during the close season. In the first decision, the Supreme Court of Canada held that Donald Marshalls practice of catching and selling eels was valid and legal, so found under the 1760 and 1761 treaties between the Mi’kmaq and Britain. Known specifically as the Burying the Hatchet ceremony, it was one of…