Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
17 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Pye v Renshaw
|
The High Court ruled that there is no constitutional guarantee for compensation.
|
|
|
ICM v Commonwealth
|
The High Court ruled that state rights to compensation can be nullified by legislation.
|
|
|
Magennis v Cth
|
The High Court ruled that the Commonwealth cannot grant financial assistance to states that involves acquisition of property through unjust means.
|
|
|
Tasmanian Dam Case
|
The High Court ruled that the legislation did not constitute acquisition.
|
|
|
Georgiadis v Telecommunications Commission
|
The High Court ruled that extinguishment of a right did not constitute acquisition.
|
|
|
Health Ins. Comm'n v Peverill
|
The High Court ruled that reduction in payable benefits did no constitute acquisition.
|
|
|
Army Minister v Dalziel
|
The High Court ruled that exclusive possession of land without title constituted property.
|
|
|
Bank of New South Wales v Commonwealth
|
The High Court ruled that company shares constituted property.
|
|
|
Smith Koine v Secretary, Department of Community Services
|
The High Court ruled that confidential information protected by equitable remedies constituted property.
|
|
|
Georgiadis v Telecommunications Commission
|
The High Court ruled that the right to sue constituted property.
|
|
|
Health Insurance Commission v Peverill
|
The High Court ruled that statutory rights to government payments constituted property.
|
|
|
Murphyores v Commonwealth
|
The High Court ruled that compensation need not be paid for diminished property value resulting from export restrictions.
|
|
|
Trade Practices Commission v Tooth
|
The High Court ruled that compensation need not be paid for diminished property value resulting from land zoning.
|
|
|
British medical Association v Commonwealth
|
The High Court ruled that compensation need not be paid for diminished property value resulting from price controls.
|
|
|
Newcrest Mining v Cth
|
The High Court ruled that the cancellation of a licence to use land for a purpose would amount to acquisition.
|
|
|
Cth v Western Australia
|
The High Court ruled that Commonwealth authorization for use of state land that inhibits use of that land does not constitute acquisition.
|
|
|
British American Tobacco Australasia v Commonwealth
|
The High Court ruled that restrictions on how a company may promote their goods using logos and phrases constitutes acquisition.
|
