Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Assault |
Definition: Fagen Ireland;Burstow~ words, actions and silence Logdon~ emphasis on what victim thought Tuberville v Savage~ words can negate Smith v working police~ immediate doesn’t mean instantaneous Men’s rea~ savage |
|
|
Battery |
Definition~ Ireland; burstow Thomas ~ touching someone’s clothes Collins v wilcock~ slightest of touches Haystead & DPP v K : indirect |
|
|
S47 |
Cunningham~ occasioning Miller ~ ABH Chan Fook~ Psychological harm T v DPP~ momentary loss of consciousness Mens rea~ Venna |
|
|
S20 & S18 |
Dica~ biological harm JCC v Eisenhower ~ wound DDP v Smith~ GBH Brown&Stratton~ multiple smaller wounds Ireland; Burstow~ psychological harm Men’s rea for S20 ~ Mowatt |
|
|
Murder |
Definition: Ser Edward Coke Foetus: AG Reference Brain dead : Manchester v Steele Men’s rea: Vickers |
|
|
Intention |
Direct: Mohan Oblique: Woollin Recklessness: Cunningham Transferred malice: Latimer v pembilton |
|
|
Causation |
Factual: R v White Victims own: Williams Third party: jordan Legal: R v Smith |
|
|
Loss of xomtol |
Definition: S54 of coroners and justices act 2009 S54(1)(a): you must lose control S54(2):doesn’t have to be sudden Ibrams v Gregory: time delay S54(1)(b) : qualifying trigger S55(3):fear harm/ death S55(4)(a): things said or done S55(4)(b): justifiably wronged S54(1)(c): age&sex R v Camplain: only characters Mohammed: reasonable man not drunk or angry Restrictions S54(4) revenge S55(6)(a) incitement S55(6)(c) cheating
|
|
|
Diminished responsibility |
Definition: S52 coroners and justices act as amended by S2 of S2(1) abnormality of mental functioning Byrne: state of mind S2(1)(a) recognised medical condition Byrne: psychiatric Ahlawalia: battered person S2(1)(b) substantial impairment S2(1A)(a) understand nature of Ds conduct S2(1A)(b) form regional judgement S2(1A)(c) express self control Egan: more than trivial S2(1)(c) provides explanation for the killing Dietschman: ignore intoxication Wood: voluntary& involuntary S2(1B) doesn’t have to be only reason |
|
|
Insanity |
M’Naughten test Unable to use reason: Clarke Disease of mind : Bratty Can be temporary: Kemp Demonstrates understanding: Windle |
|
|
Gross Negligence manslaughter |
Definition: Adamako Duty:Pittwood, Evans, Gibbons & Procter, stone & dobinson, children& young persons act Breach: Holloway Foreseeable risk of death Reasonable man: Misra Gross: Bateman |
|
|
Duress |
Threat of death or harm: Valdera-Vega Threats to family: Martin Threats to friends: Conway Graham test Threats must be specific: Cole Safe avenue: gill Police protection it always sufficient: Hudson v Taylor Reinforce threat Over bear Ds will: Abdul-Hussain Violent gang: Sharp Non violent: shepherd |
|
|
Automatism |
Definition: Bratty Involuntary: Hill v Baxter External: R v T Quicke |
|
|
Intoxication |
Involuntary No mens rea: Kingston Strength of intoxication: Allen None dangerous in dangerous way: Hardie Dutch courage: Gallagher Voluntary Basic intent: Majewska Specific intent: Sheehan v Moore
|
|
|
Self- defence |
Necessary force: Gladstone Pre-emotive strike: Bird , Hussain&Another Intoxication:S76(5) criminal justice- rules out Gladstone Reasonable force: Palmer Judge D circumstances : S76(6)&(3)
|
