Zusammenfassung Case Summary

Decent Essays
Thank you Ida!!! :-) There are times when a contract can be broken. Previous examples given such as, when active concealment, intentionally hiding information, has taken place, it could cause a contract to be invalid, or, someone(s) could be held liable in a lawsuit. When referencing the UCC's Implied Warranty of Merchantability, the vehicle did not do what it was sold to do, to be a safe method of transportation. Then, we have the misrepresentation of the brakes that was a contributing factor in Maynard's decision to purchase the Mustang. For this reason, a lawsuit could reference, The Basis-of-the-Bargain Requirement under Express Warranty. Maynard's refund could be considered in judgment due to Pierre being found to be liable due to Negligent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case 13.3 Kohel v. Bergen Auto Enterprises, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013. 2013 WL 439970. Issue: This case involved allegations of breach of contract involving which parties and for what actions?…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organization Bunge Nipawin, is a canola crushing and refining plant in Nipawin, Saskatchewan, which is part of a larger company called Bunge Limited. Bunge Nipawin specifically sells canola meal, crude canola oil, and refined canola oil to various external and internal customers. As the refinery and utilities supervisor, I look after the tank farm inventory, the bleaching process, the deodorizing process, the boilers and auxiliary equipment, the tailings pond, and the skimming pits. The Pitch - Problem Background It is industry practice to hinge a quality specification on a taste test, prior to shipping the rail car of canola oil to the customer.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The case of Tommy Takem, the owner of Takem’s Appliances & Electronics, LLC against Sally Walker is one of a mistreated sales contract. When Sally Walker purchased the laptop from Takem’s Applicances & Electronics, she entered into a sales contract in which she promised to pay for the laptop. The specific terms of the contract are unknown, as to the price Sally agreed to pay Takem for the laptop, the time period over which the payments would be made, if the contract was written or oral, and so on. It is even unknown whether the contract is even valid at this point. Assuming that at the time Sally purchased the laptop, both she and Takem came to an agreement on all terms, thus entering into a sales contract.…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nonemacher Case Summary

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Wednesday at 12:03 AM Resident Director Brandon Winslow received a phone call from Resident Assistant Christian San Pedro regarding a resident of concern. Resident Maryssa Hodder and Resident Marena Horan came to Resident Assistant Kayli Boyes with concerns on the whereabouts of Resident Falon Nonemacher who also resides in McHale 327. Resident Nonemacher was not answering phone calls from both Resident Hodder and Horan. RD Winslow was informed that Resident Nonemacher left to go home on Tuesday October 3rd around 1:00AM. Then returned for class later around 9:00AM on Tuesday.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Claimant's Case Summary

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages

    According to Witnesses, Office Manager, Elizabeth Duarte and Payroll Clerk, Liz Sanchez the Claimant was identified as General Labor Worker, where she was assigned to work at Sundate LLC, (Date Farm), when she first started working there on 3/16/16 up until her last day of work on 5/2/2016. On DOL: 4/20/2016, both Duarte and Sanchez were notified by the Claimant’s Supervisor/Witness Guadalupe Zazueta of the claimant's alleged injuries after the claimant slipped and fell on a single pair of stairs that led out from the Warehouse during her lunch break. Ms. Zazueta said the claimant complained of pain to her bilateral wrists, elbows and her left knee and ankle.…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schlosser's Case Summary

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Schlosser opens the section depicting the first individual he met in Colorado Springs, a nearby farmer the named Hank. He needed to gain from Hank how improvement in the range and the fast food industry commands were influencing neighborhood dairy cattle business. Hank indicated Schlosser the new subdivisions that are being based on ranges where dairy cattle used to wander. Hank raised his cows by moving them starting with one field then onto the next. The steers brushed on the greens and afterward were crowded to another crisp field of greens.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The case of David McCallum who at the time of his charge was a sixteen-year-old boy was charged along with his friend Willie Stuckey who where charged for a kidnapping and murder. McCallum and Stuckey were found guilty of kidnapping and killing a young Queens’s man in 1986 and sentenced to 25 years for a crime he did not commit. He served a twenty-eight year sentence before being found not guilty and let out of prison. The main cause of the wrongful conviction was McCallum and Stuckey admitted kidnapping and killing 20-year-old Nathan Blenner and taking a joyride in his car. They quickly recanted but were convicted of murder.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    At approximately 6:08 a.m., Detective L. Donegain exited from apartment 1205 Southwood Drive, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28314 and noticed three individual’s two females and one male standing behind apartment 1207 Southwood Drive. The male individual appeared to have sustained a gunshot wound to his right leg and was in need of medical attention. The male was identified as Darrell Maurie Hinton aka Rell or Blackout (Black male, 12/22/1988). Darrell Hinton stated he was in apartment 1207 Southwood Drive and needed help. He also stated he was with the two deceased victims prior to the shooting.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on true events, Boston attorney Jan Schlictmann takes on two powerful businesses suspected of polluting the drinking water in Woburn Massachusetts. Schlictmann, a wealthy and successful personal injury attorney, finds himself entrenched in a long and expensive legal battle with Beatrice Foods, W.R. Grace, and a local tannery. Schlictmann intends to prove that these businesses neglected to properly dispose of harmful chemicals such as silicone and trichloroethylene. Motivated by greed, the companies saved millions of dollars by illegally dumping these chemicals. Over time the chemicals seeped into the ground and eventually into the nearby groundwater wells.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legal Case Summary

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brenda is a 25-year-old female who reports that she is facing legal issues. She currently resides in Indianapolis, Indiana. Brenda reports that she is seeking our services because her lawyer wanted her too. She mentioned that she has no history of mental illness. Brenda mentioned that she worked at a bank.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Neser Case Summary

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Neser first contends that the Board erred in looking beyond the text of the HCGPP to glean the intent of the provision involving call-in pay. Neser argues that the text is unambiguous, and as such the Board was unjustified in looking to extrinsic sources to discern the HCGPP’s meaning. We disagree. “‘The first step in determining legislative intent is to look at the statutory language and if the words of the statute, construed according to their common and everyday meaning, are clear and unambiguous. . . .’” Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newbold's Case Summary

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a Chronological list of cases, Newbold stated that because of this case in “1911 The first conviction is achieved on the basis of fingerprints. The case involves Thomas Jennings, found guilty of murder in Cook County, Illinois” (1999). The case of People v. Jennings happened in 1911 after Clarence B. Hiller was murdered in his own home one night. Hiller and his family were all asleep in their home when it happened. It wasn’t until Hiller woke up and found that their gas light was no longer on that he thought something was wrong (Acree, 1999).…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    E Z Car Wash's Negligence

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages

    They were incorrect because quasi-contracts apply only when something was lost by one party out of the negligence of another party. In this case however something positive, a free wax, was the result of E-Z Car Wash's negligence, meaning there would be no quasi-contract. They were incorrect because quasi-contracts apply only when something was lost by one party out of the negligence of another party. In this case however something positive, a free wax, was the result of E-Z Car Wash's negligence, meaning there would be no quasi-contract. They were incorrect because quasi-contracts apply only when something was lost by one party out of the negligence of another party.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the auditors in this case, Ernst & Whinney, should have great blame in not having the sufficient information and knowledge to fall into the pressure of the bribes committed by Minkow and analyze the fraud that was occurring. The upper management in ZZZZ Best made the financial information seem perfectly fine, therefore the auditors were unable to identify any miscalculations that would then lead to fraud. Minkow and his company for years kept on staling the fact that his insurance business had an actual positive cash flows system occurring. This would keep the auditors from seeing the main problem concerning the fraud that was started from the very beginning by Minkow and his carpet/insurance business. As this wasn’t enough fake information conducted by…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays