Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Morally Wrong

Superior Essays
“It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first. …show more content…
Document G shows a picture of the Hiroshima bomb and it states that the mushroom cloud made from the bomb in ten minutes was above 60,000 feet high. A good point to look at is that the fire-bombing in Tokyo killed more people than the Hiroshima bomb. Why was there not an outcry after the Tokyo bombing? People in Japan didn’t cry out after the Tokyo bombing because they were probably already finding a better way to get revenge than the atomic bomb we had. They must’ve been planning something and had a brilliant plan to take out America. Dropping the first bomb on Japan was a very big destruction, 80,000 people died instantly from the bomb. If we wouldn’t have sent this bomb, Japan wouldn’t have taken us as serious as they shouldn’t have. America was sending this bomb as a very destructive, brutal warning. Telling them to surrender or die. Apparently, the Japanese didn’t think the Hiroshima bomb was a clear enough message and still did not surrender-- this was a major mistake they made. America then, finally dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. 60,000 people died instantly. After the bombing on Nagasaki is when Japan finally got the hint to surrender. Document I states ““…The Japanese began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor. They have been repaid many fold. And the end is not yet. With this bomb we have now added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces.” This message is very powerful because it is explaining that the end of the war is coming to an end, and that other armies should be scared of them because they have the atomic bomb which is more of a technological advance than any of the other countries have. After this war, America is safe for a little bit until other countries are able to make the same atomic bomb we have, and America won’t be safe anymore. It would be just like the same old days where basically every

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All in all, the atomic bombs were justified by bringing the United States control over Japan to be able to install better living conditions in Japan and shut down any ideas of future retaliation. On the other hand, some may argue it was morally wrong to drop the atomic bombs, though it was justified due to the necessity of the bombs for the rest of the world. While the deaths associated with the bombs are terrible, they were bound to happen. It just depended on who was getting killed and how long it took to kill them. Therefore, it was a necessity for the bombs “to be used on an enemy target” (Doc 1) to end the war and bring home millions of…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paul Fussell, U.S Infantryman in Europe stated, “When bombs were dropped and the news began to circulate that we would not be obligated in a few months to rush up the beaches near Tokyo assault-firing while being machine-gunned, mortared and shelled we broke down and cried with relief and joy”(Document H). A land invasion of Japan would have been inevitable if the bombs had not been dropped on Japan. A day similar to D-Day would have occurred which would have undoubtedly created more problems. The American soldiers rejoiced at the bombing of Japan because they knew that the fighting was over and their lives would not be at risk anymore in the war. Document E depicts a physical map of Japan.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated previously, the United States’ objective was to obliterate Japan with their military power in order to make them surrender from the war, “Only the complete destruction of her military power could open way to lasting peace” (Document #3). At this point in the war, Japan was already in a devastated state due to the wrath of incendiary bomb raids and shortages in food. To push them over the edge into “waving the white flag”, the atomic bombs were necessary so that the Japanese could not be able to continue their fight and finally put an end to the entire war. Therefore, resulting in a win for the…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ww2 Persuasive Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The U.S. had an alternative plan and decided that they would drop an atomic bomb that would cripple Japan, but not wipe them off the map. The atomic bomb killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people (including the nuclear effects). Overall, Japan recovered from the bombing and did not suffer complete annihilation. The US made the correct choice because fewer people, both Japanese and American died, This ended the war quicker, and in the end Japan was not wiped off the map. Japan had stated that would not surrender to the US.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Maddox disputed that ” The reason for using atomic weapons on Japan was not to defeat an already defeated Japan, but to make the soviet Union more “manageable” by demonstrating the enormous power now in American possession." However, the dropping of the bomb brought the war to an end quicker. By Ending the war faster, the United States was finally able to bring back home all the exhausted American soldiers. Based on the ideas of Eisei Ishikawa and David L. Swain from the article "Hiroshima and Nagasaki," "Those who dropped the first atomic bomb worked thereafter to demonstrate its destructive powers and to justify its use as a way of ending the war quickly so as to limit the number of combat…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The attacks are considered to be inhumane as it caused a widespread of death and left devastating results. The main reason as to why two atomic bomb attacks were unnecessary was because historians believed that there were alternative actions that should have taken place. The bomb’s main objective was to force Japan in surrendering. However, at the time, Japan was on the verge of defeat and was ready to surrender. During Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbour, they were at its peak of power.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Did the U.S. have right to drop the A-bomb on Hiroshima? There is much debate about whether or not, after Pearl Harbor, the U.S. should have attacked Japan with the bombing of Hiroshima, a largely populated Japanese city. For instance, Japan had killed many U.S. troops and stolen many American lives, but was nuclear warfare the answer? On the other hand, if the U.S. had not acted out, would they have lost more lives in the long run?…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decades after the atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Americans still question whether it was a good idea to drop them. One of the reasons the bombs should have been dropped is the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The United States and Japan were at peace until Japan bombed a military base in Hawaii and afterward, president Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. In his well-known infamy speech, FDR stated, “I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” America and its people saw the bombing as an act of war and in return, they declared war.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays