Operation Barbarossa Failure

Improved Essays
The Turning Point in World War Two Plan of the Investigation
Why did Operation Barbarossa fail to meet its objectives in 1941? This topic is important as codename Barbarossa was the largest campaign in terms of manpower ever launched , and its failure started the turn of the tides that would ultimately cause Hitler and Nazi Germany 's destruction. A brief overview on the causes and objectives of the operation will be given, referencing Hitler 's Mein Kampf, and then the reasons for failure will be examined: underestimating Soviet forces, fighting a two-front war, setbacks due to Soviet partisan brigades, Hitler 's indecisiveness, and the Russian weather and terrain. The evidence will be collected from a variety of secondary sources then listed and analysed in detail to reach an effective and successful answer to the question. Summary of Evidence 1. Underestimating the Soviets In Mein Kampf, Hitler states: "[T]o assure work and bread to the increasing number of people..., [Germany must] acquire new soil in order annually to send off the superfluous millions, and thus conserve the nation further on the basis of a self-sustainment. For Germany... the only possibility of carrying out a sound territorial policy was to be found in the acquisition of new soil in Europe proper. ...If one wanted land and soil in Europe, then by and large this could only have been done at Russia 's expense. " The conquest of Russia would place the European continent almost completely under Hitler 's control, and allow Germany to mobilize all its forces for the eventual attack against the Anglo-American powers. Hitler also wished to destroy Marxism communism and the Slavic peoples, who he saw as "subhuman". 2. A Two-Front War Germany was at war with England at the time, and Operation Barbarossa would mean Germany would be fighting a two-front war. The Russians were still a non-enemy country with which Germany still had advantageous economic and trade relations with. Resources would have to be split between the two fronts. Hitler 's ideology gave him a confidence that victory against the Soviets would come fast and easily. 3. Russian Partisan Brigades Russian soldiers who had been defeated but evaded capture led bands of partisan armies, which had been formed in the Russian forests and marshes. Throughout 1941, partisan work grew increasingly intense, until it became a mass-movement "people 's war". A Central Partisan Staff was created, which co-ordinated activities with the Red army and supplied people with training and weapons. 4. Hitler 's Changes in Plans Hitler made many changes in objectives. His primary target started out being Moscow, as he believed Stalin would sacrifice all he could in defence of the capital, and this way the Germans could destroy the Red Army efficiently. However, Hitler changed his priorities to Leningrad and the Ukraine, so Army Group Centre, one of the three German Army Groups in Barbarossa, was forced to hand over its Panzer tanks to Army Group North and South. Two months later, Hitler once again changed plans and Moscow was once again to be the priority. Redeployment of the tanks from
…show more content…
He worked in many universities in England before becoming the head of the Center for Defence studies in the University of Edinburgh. His wife, Professor Ljubica Erickson, helped him in his research and writing of Russian military affairs. The book holds great value as John Erickson had many relations with Soviet Generals, and had direct access to Russian archives, allowing him detailed pieces of evidence to use in his own writings. However, the book is limited to the Russians and their peoples during the war, and displays a bias towards the Russians, as the German side is not told in detail, and the supporting evidence is mostly on Soviet …show more content…
Russia 's extensive use of partisan forces is another reason, as the partisans were the unseen army that heavily slowed the German advance with sabotage tactics. Hitler 's meddling and indecisiveness towards a main target caused a backlash that would slow the German advance until wintertime, where the troops froze in freezing temperatures. Finally, the Russian weather and terrain concludes the arguments as to why Barbarossa was unable to meet its objectives, but instead began Hitler and the Nazi party 's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq 22

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This leaves the question of the pincer: would a Japanese attack have allowed the Nazis to successfully complete Operation Barbarossa's objectives? Well, probably not. While it's certainly true that being able to transfer troops out of Siberia helped the Soviet war effort, the Nazis only made it to Moscow in October of 1941 and weren't doing well by that point. Most of their motor vehicles - trucks, tanks and the like - were out of commission and there had been substantial casualties to that point.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Stalingrad Dbq

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Battle of Stalingrad, which was a major battle on the Eastern Front of World War I, introduced awful ways of living to many people. During this battle, Nazi Germany and their allies fought the Soviet Union in order to gain control of the southern city in Russia. The Battle of Stalingrad was known as the turning of the war in favor of the Allies. Approximately 40,000 Soviet civilians lost their lives during the time of Stalingrad. The amount of Soviet armed forces that were killed, wounded, or went missing was about 1,120,000.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1960s and 70s, just a few centuries after World War II, many historians believed that the Wehrmacht had nothing to do with Hitler and Nazi ideology, instead they believed that the soldiers were doing their job. Many historians also believed that the Wehrmacht used to be a regular army distinct from the SS. Throughout the book, Hitler’s Army, Omer Bartov examines the question, was the Wehrmacht Hitler’s Army? Bartov addresses to what extent did propaganda and Nazi ideology serve as a driving force for the Wehrmacht on the Eastern front. While the Wehrmacht was fighting on the Eastern front, they found themselves facing new and strong attacks.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War II sent humanity into another global and political struggle, resulting in the largest war death toll in history. 1941 saw the constant rise of the supremacy of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi troops in both Europe and North Africa. Prior to the Siege of Tobruk, Germany had “began its own offensive into Cyrenaica,” and “attacked Greece and Yugoslavia, seizing them by the end of the month,” (Battistelli P.P. 2012). “Rommel’s troops were poised to capture all of Libya and press on to Egypt,” (Murray J.J. 2011) yet the collective Allied resistance, consisting mostly of Australian troops, was successful in the defence of the strategical port of Tobruk. The Siege of Tobruk displayed both the overconfidence of German troops and character of Australia’s ANZAC qualities, which combined with the strategical importance of the Libyan town of…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main ideas presented in Major Problems in the History of World War II: Chapter 4 revolve around the analysis of the use of strategic bombing and its effects on the war. Documents presented in this chapter focus on the importance of naval and air warfare as well as the most effective way to defeat Germany as presented by allied leaders. Historians Richard Overy and Michael S. Sherry provide their analyses of the importance of airpower in the war and how it affected all parties involved in the war. Overy discusses the importance of naval and air power and how strategic bombings were able to shape the outcome of the war, while Sherry talks more about the destruction caused by the bombings during the war was directly linked to fanaticism that…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The secondary source is in perspective of British Historian Paul Kennedy, arguing in his work of 1989 that whilst soldiers value total war, it leaves home fronts in a state of economic and social calamity. The origin aids in reliability, as the date of 1988 was post-war, and thus was no censorship on what historians wrote, meaning Kennedy’s descriptions are free of external control. The narrow perspective Kennedy limits the reliability, evident in his favorable comparisons of the allied home fronts, opposed to the German home front. The sources fails to consider the positive innovations of the German home front, such as the ersatz products resulting from the blockade . Kennedy’s persuasive tone reduces the reliability, as Kennedy’s motivation to elucidate that all powers will fall from their zenith and the economic condition of a country will affect its victory or downfall during wartime.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tactical mistake of Operation Barbarossa was thought to be a Blitzkrieg or ‘lightning war’ as explained in ‘Inside the Third Reich’, “You only have to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crashing down – Hitler” (Speer, 1984). Supporters of Nazi Germany expected a quick victory, as written in Joseph Goebbels’s diary entry (see appendix 2). Germany was seen as unbeatable - as evident in Macha Rolnika’s diary (see appendix 3) where she expressed her fear towards the Nazis - hence their loss to the USSR stripped Germany of its dignity and optimism. The USSR’s relations with Germany deteriorated the moment Operation Barbarossa began with the break in the non-aggression pact (see appendix 4). Weaker nations such as Belgium were fearful that the USSR’s strength might threaten their independence.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overy explains, even as people have been taught since World War II was over that the Allies were going to win anyway, the Allies were not always the frontrunner in the war. Up until 1942, the Allies were forced to plan for alternate routes of getting the war over with, such as negotiations, stalemate, or even surrender. The USSR had lost the heart of its industry, the United States was not armed and ready, and other Allies were fighting relentlessly and not making much progress. So…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Time was on Russia 's side. Strike sooner than later.(North pg.8A)This supports my reason Germany couldn’t fight a two front war so instead the germans still decided to attack even earlier than before causing even more weakness in the army. North also quotes While the initial success of Barbarossa had been significant, the Germans failed to subdue the Soviet Union by the time the first snows fell in November 1941. The worsening weather made combat operations difficult for the German soldiers struggling to reach Moscow (North pg.8A)The Germans should have waited after the winter months to begin Operation Barbarossa but they decided to push thinking the russians could be easily defeated but they were…

    • 1525 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Did Hitler Lose Ww2

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Large miscalculations were repeated in the same year, when Hitler managed to disregard 340,0003 British troops located at Dunkirk, while he was concentrating on planning his invasion of the USSR. This allowed for the majority of the soldiers to retreat, and therefore Hitler lost the chance to seriously dent and demoralise the British army, which could have served as a large step towards German victory. However, Hitler 's miscalculation of the invasion of the USSR was arguably the reason as to why the Nazis lost the second world war. In 1941 Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa4, which was the invasion of the USSR, who at the time, had signed a peace treaty with Germany.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Afhq Failure

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Allied Forces wasted an opportunity to gain a position of relative advantage over the Germany Army by the failure to contain Germany forces in Sicily. The inability of Allied Force Headquarters (AFHQ) to seize the initiative allowed the Germany leadership time to develop the withdrawal of forces to Italy. The essay will address the dysfunctional command and control of the AFHQ at the various levels of leadership which allowed an orderly withdrawal of Axis forces. It will evaluate the command and control of the Allied leadership.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrasting World War I versus. World War II History is the past, and it’s important to reflect on the past, to help ensure that as a society we don’t repeat mistakes. At the time of both World War I and World War II, each became the largest war in history up until that point. Each war shared tremendous amounts of death, and the involvement of many countries, so it’s crucial to analyze the causes and the factors of each war to truly see the nature of the circumstances revolving both wars.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The conference was the first meeting to include Stalin. His backing and America’s emergence as the leading supplier to the war effort forced Britain’s concurrence to a 1944 cross-channel invasion. This was the tipping point when the strategy changed from the Sun Tzu philosophy of the British to the Clausewitzian approach of the American’s. The new plan became one focused on a decisive attack against Germany’s center of gravity; the Third Reich.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Did Hitler Lose Ww2

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Most people do not realize how close Hitler actually was to winning World War II. They assume that it was a quick and easy win for the Allied forces. What really in fact won the war for the Allies was the drastic mistakes Hitler himself made by always seeming to place his ideology before all strategic decisions. Hitler 's self centered personality led his decisions in Britain, Russia, and even in Germany to prove fatal to Germany 's war effort.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany renounced war between the two countries, giving the Soviet Union much needed time to strengthen itself before Germany’s certain betrayal. Through the pact, Russia was not only promised half of Poland, a territory which had been under Russian sovereignty before World War I, but the Baltic States and Bulgaria. Although Ribbentrop, under the guidance of Hitler, most likely didn’t assume that Russia was ever planning to expand it’s sphere of influence to these regions. With the non-aggression pact, Ribbentrop had secured a safe border with Russia, and through the invasion of Poland had consequently bloodied the hands of Russia in the eyes of the West. When trying to understand…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays