War Between Science And Religion Essay

Improved Essays
The War between Science and Religion
“Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus of Thor – but they have few followers now.” Sir Arthur C. Clarke

In the beginning there was nothing: just darkness. Then out of nothing appeared everything. Then there were questions. Why are we? How are we? Why does the world and nature act as it does? What happens when we die? Religion answered these questions with make-believe stories of gods and goddesses and other ‘supernatural forces’ beyond human understanding. Science is able to explain these ‘supernatural forces’ with proof and evidence. Science and religion have always been at war. Science is based on observation and what we can explain using formulae and theorem. Religious arguments on the other hand, are questionable in nature and require faith. Battles have been won by both sides, but in the modern 21st century religions are slowly losing soldiers to fight for their beliefs. The Citizenship Survey, conducted in England and Wales has consistently shown - over the past 5 years – that the number of people who declare themselves as Christians has fallen by almost 10 percent. Whereas the percentage of those who say they have no religion increased from 15 percent to 21 percent. This shows that religion is increasingly
…show more content…
Many non-religious people argue that morality does not need any foundation in religious belief. What is considered virtuous or sinful in many religions is purely what any human being – with good judgement – would consider being right or wrong. Morality in religion takes the guise of a reward system: do something good and you will be rewarded, do something bad and you will be punished. Even Socrates could find flaws in the religious occupied territory of morality. “Power doesn’t corrupt people, people corrupt

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Around three thousand years ago, a story about the creation of the universe came into existence. This story, overtime became the agreed-upon functioning story for Western society. A shared and fixed understanding of creation unified people, despite turbulent times. However in response to the destruction of the Black Death, people began to think of the world in one of two different ways. The first was “towards a religious redemption out of a tragic world,” and the other was, “towards a greater control of the physical world” (Berry 125).…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides, now we have historians of science who not only agree with this notion but also reject the idea that religion and science are not compatible. They have gone ahead to write volumes refuting “the conflict thesis”: the idea that religion and science are essentially in conflict (Seiler). For example, Stark; one of the most contemporary advocates for the new view, published his book For the Glory of God dedicating a chapter to the notion that the philosophical groundwork on which modern science developed was laid, by…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Science is the study of the world in which god doesn’t exist leading scientists to hunt down evidence of the cause of natural phenomena. “Then, then in the same breath Zeus hit the craft with a lightning-bolt and thunder” (Homer 209). Without evidence, there is no theory behind the cause of the thunderstorm. In the eyes of Odysseus, he saw Zeus while in the eyes of a scientist they would only see an anomaly of a storm suddenly picking up for over the ocean. Humans use science to explain natural events amongst the Earth and religion is used to explain all anomalies and supernatural events, furthermore, both provide an insight into the future given past events.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons to make morally right decisions. John Arthur argues that while religion provides many good reasons to make morally just decisions, it is not the only reason to do the right thing, so therefore religion is not necessary for morality. His argument is valid, but it is not sound. John Arthur’s argument is unsound because the “good non-religious reasons to be moral” that he speaks of are merely feelings of guilt, which stem from the knowledge of what is right or wrong that was based off of religious beliefs.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Modern Science would unarguably be completely different without the Scientific Revolution. It was a major moment in the history of Western Culture, not to mention science and it’s history as a whole. Out of the Scientific Revolution came modern science and things like the scientific method were created. Countless scientific discoveries came from the great research of key figures in the scientific revolution such as Newton, Galileo, and Copernicus. The scientific revolution took place in a location and era where the majority of the population practiced Christianity, so as a result Christianity was a very prominent part of the culture during that time.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind”-Einstein. I am energised by the debates that are sparked by statements like this and this is where my love of philosophy has flourished; studying reason and argument at university is a natural and exciting progression for me. Philosophy and Ethics A level has encouraged me to build up my views as an individual, specifically exploring the Christian perspective of debates and how they contrast with other beliefs. to do this, I have read books such as ‘God’s Undertaker’ by John Lennox which takes a logical approach to understanding and opposing common arguments put forward by atheists such as Dawkins.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bruce does make a point to say that, while people see religion and science as conflicting opposites, religion is challenged less by specific science than by the underlying logic of sciences, as the logic causes people to look for answers and “undermines the notion of a fixed and unchanging…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles V Religion

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Emperor Charles V was a Spanish ruler and emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. The painting is of Charles V after his victory at the battle of Muhlberg which won him the Schmalkaldic War, (“Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547)” Encyclopedia.com). Emperor Charles seeked to unite Europe under Roman Catholic but with the rising numbers of Protestants he declared war on Protestantism. Charles V was a failure not only because he failed to unite Europe but because he tried to use religion to control and unite people with force. Religion should never play a role in the governing of people or play a part in determining the freedoms of an individual.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science and theology are always thought by many people to be in stark contrast and constantly in conflict with each other. However, this is not necessarily the case according to Tom Gilson, the author of the article, “The Conflict Between Religion and Science”. In his article Gilson argues that science and faith are not in conflict, but rather work together in unison to make sense of the world. Gilson supports the idea that while science and faith might seem to have opposite ideas, in reality, they do not contradict each other. Gilson argues that while science is very important for our understanding of the world, theology is equally as important and the conflict between religion and science comes from ignorance rather than fact.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Life of Pi Qouation Anylasis “Religion?” Mr. Kumar grinned broadly. “I don’t believe in religion. Religion is darkness. ”(Martel, 29).…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organized religion is an impediment to civilized societies. It is not necessary in explaining the complexity in or the origin of the universe. It is not required to enforce positive morals or to explain the source of morality. It does, in fact, work against these efforts, contrary to its self imposed claims. It continually regresses general scientific understanding with forming grand assumptions, promoting ignorance and discouraging skepticism.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In many ways science proves religion to be false. Religious individuals do not want to believe the facts that science proven because it proves their beliefs to be false. It all boils down to proof, there are many ideas religious individuals believe in that have no clear or exact answer. Nothing about religion is factual, instead it is all based off of belief and idea. While science is centered around fact and proof.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though today this argument between science and religion is often seen today as something of the past and something that is now very trivial, the divide between these two systems of beliefs is more prevalent we know. This divide is affecting not only the education that people in America and around the world are receiving, but the care they are receiving in contrast with the care that they deserve, and the knowledge they are willing to accept, along with the diversity that surrounds them everyday. The fact that this divide is no longer given much attention can have serious consequences in terms of the quality of life of all individuals in societies all around the world. It could very well be true that efforts towards bringing together the concepts of science and religion, whether it be by creating efforts to connect the two or creating efforts in order to let them harmoniously coexist, could be a determining factor of the success of not only society as it exists today but also of the generations that have yet to…

    • 1371 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Christianity does embraces scientific reasoning because we live in a world that science has helped to improve humankind, life style, however, when science takes the place of God’s authority in the earth, man will only be subjective to his thoughts and not God the creator of all creations. Consequently, science is completely different from Christianity. Christians center their attention on values, morals, faith, and truth. They believe in the principle of the Bible, and that the Bible reveals the mind of God to those who have accepted him as their Savior. In addition, Christianity embraces the Bible as being the infallible word of God, and without it acceptance, man will be lost in their sins.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science Vs Religion

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Therefore, the common ground between science and religion, specifically on the topic of evolution, is minimal but important. They overlap at the origin of evolution. In one form, science would never have strived towards discovering evolution if it weren’t for the religious views of Victorian Europe pushing Charles Darwin to construct his book ‘The Origin of Species’. Another form of the overlap is a commonly believed theory, involving evolution being God’s tool. This theory states that evolution has occurred but was somewhat instigated by God himself; this is often linked to the belief that God also caused The Big…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays