Voluntary Nonsuit: Court Case Study

Improved Essays
1. Withdrawn/Voluntary Nonsuit When the plaintiff abandons his case, and consents that judgment go against him for costs.
2. Compromise/ Settlement - no court hearing A settlement that does not necessarily involve both parties appearing before the judge. Includes dismissals initiated by one of the parties for failure to prosecute; reconciliation orders, workers’ compensation settlements; compromise and settlement orders. Agreed Orders of Dismissal or Compromise/Agreed Settlements should be reported as ‘Compromise/Settlements’ not as ‘Dismissals’. Typically the parties have reached an agreement and the attorneys or parties have brought the order for the judge to sign. Note that a judge may swear in a witness and hear testimony, as long
…show more content…
Trial-Non-Jury (Bench) A trial is held before a judge. The party or parties have come before the judge seeking a decision based on the merits of their case. Witnesses and evidence are presented and the judge renders a final decision in the case. When at least one witness has been sworn under this scenario, the case is to be reported as disposed by Trial – Non-Jury even if the parties reach a compromise or settlement.
8. Trial-Jury Trial is held before a judge with jury impaneled. The party or parties appear in court seeking a jury verdict on the merits of their case. Please note that under this scenario once a jury is impaneled, whether they render a verdict or not, the case is to be reported as disposed by Trial-Jury even if the parties reach a compromise or settlement.
9. Other Any case disposed in a manner not specifically described in one of the other categories.
Multiple Party Dispositions:
If a civil case involves multiple parties, only report one disposition for the case. Once judgments have been reached for all parties, the case should be disposed. The highest level manner of disposition should be used in the disposition, using the order of ranking listed below. “Trial – Jury” is the highest level and “Other” is the lowest level.

See page 21 for “Manner of Dispostion”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Garza v. Farias FACTS Eduardo G. Garza and Uni-Trade Fowarding, L.C., “the plaintiffs” filed a defamation suit against Dr. Hector Farias and Voices in Democratic Actions (VIDA), “the defendants”. This was in result of alleged political ties with Garza and Laredo city council members. This political tie resulted in his companies winning on a bid for the proposed lease. The defamation among Garza was the importance of this case. The defendants then filed a motion to dismiss to the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act, and the appeal followed.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the help of the villagers, Blair was able to research the life story about the brothel boy, along with the crime he committed. The Brothel Boy is far from a boy, as he is roughly twenty or so years old, who was born and raised in the Brothel. He was the son of a woman who worked in the brothel as a prostitute, but died shortly after the boy’s birth, and a man who was unknown. Therefore, the brothel keeper took him in to raise him. It was extremely apparent that the boy was uneducated and retarded, “The boy was obviously stupid.”…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malice Liability Case

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Question 1: A: True. Malice aforethought is “a planned killing motivated by spite” (Woolman, Homicide). Additionally, there is express malice. Express malice is the “defendant’s subjective intent to kill”, or more specifically their feelings or opinions (ChartaCourse). Hatred or the emotional equivalent is a person’s feelings or opinions and goes directly to subjective intent to kill.…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are broken down into five subgroups of their own: Outline of Proceedings, Examination of Jurors – Selection, Witness Testimony, Exhibits and Proceedings at the Illinois Supreme Court. An interesting document in the first subgroup is the Petition for Change of Venue. It stresses that the defendants…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Local Trial Courts in Texas There are two types of local trial courts in Texas: Municipal Courts and Justice of Peace Courts. The first type has limited criminal jurisdiction. Municipal Courts are created by Texas Legislature to work at the city level. The amount of courts in each location depends up its population and public needs.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Abstract The Grutter v. Bollinger case is considered one of the Supreme Court Landmarks. This case, applying student, Barbara Gutter was denied acceptance into The University of Michigan Law School because of the university’s affirmative action police and her race. This case review covers the facts of the case, including the name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, the judgment, the issues of what is in dispute, the courts holding, rationale, dissent of the Supreme Court members, party’s arguments, and personal commentary. (a) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A trial gives the prosecution and the defence an equal opportunity to present their evidence. The judge decides whether the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of any or all of the charges. A basic principle of Canada's justice system is that the accused is innocent until proven guilty. The trial begins with the prosecutor presenting the evidence against the accused.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grand Jury Research Paper

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, the purpose of a trial jury is to determine the innocence or guilt of a person that has already been indicted by a grand jury or a preliminary hearing has found information. A trial jury is a group of people called upon by the courts to hear testimonies from the defense and the prospector, thus allowing the idea of “innocent until proven guilty” back into the courtroom. The jury of a trial can either convict or acquit the defendant, depending on the ruling of the…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Trial By Jury

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The idea of trial by jury, like many American philosophies, developed during the Enlightenment era. It was incorporated into the constitution by the seventh amendment, outlining court and legal procedures, along with the fifth, sixth, and eighth. It states that the right to a trial by jury shall be preserved, and any trial without a jury will be examined by the supreme court, than the rules of the common law. It is a fundamental part of the United States legal system, because it means that the court system cannot send innocent people to jail, without first giving them a chance to defend themselves. This specific amendment has helped build much of our legal system, including lawyers and attorneys, who help defend people in court.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Answer the following question: Define the term statistical hypothesis. A hypothesis that is testable on the basis of a process being observed through a set of random variables.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 2: He is a shy person who takes time to feel comfortable enough to participate in the discussion. This can be seen because he was not contributive or driver of the discussion but later contributed his opinion. He is bit insecure in his taught. Jury 3: He is prejudiced about his taught.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should There Any Judgement Limitation of Testimonial in Social Media ? Social medias are computer-mediated tools that allow people or companies to create, share, or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos in virtual communities and networks. Social media is a wonderful channel for brands to engage with their target tribe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays