Essay On The Exclusionary Rule

Improved Essays
The words freedom, rights, equality, and liberty are important words to America. These four words emulate what the United States Constitution stand for. The United States Constitution was created to allow every citizen freedom to pursue their goals and dreams, as well as make important decisions regarding the direction of their life. Nearly 300 years later, the United States still tries to follow the laws and rights granted by the Constitution. There are many individuals who abide and uplift the Constitution; however, others chose to neglect what was written in the Constitution. From illegal searches to racial profiling arrest, when do these violations of the Constitution end? According to the Constitution, American citizens have rights that should not to be violated. In other words, under the Fourth Amendment “you have the right not to have yourself, your home, and other personal possessions searched and seized without probable cause (U.S. Const. Amend. IV).”

What gives the Fourth Amendment the right to “search” someone or something? For nearly two centuries, no one could clearly determine this until the 1967 case
…show more content…
In the case of Jardines v. Florida, the Exclusionary rule protected Jardines on a technicality ("Fourth Amendment--Trespass Test--Florida v. Jardines," 2013). Jardines was able to prove that Miami-Dade Police and DEA illegally used a sniff-test to determine if marijuana was in his home ("Fourth Amendment -- Trespass Test -- Florida v. Jardines," 2013). Moreover, the judges believed that had Miami-Dade Police and DEA served a warrant and notified Jardines he was being investigated the case could have ended differently ("Fourth Amendment--Trespass Test--Florida v. Jardines," 2013). Conclusively, depending on the severity of the case it determines whether the Amendment rights were violated (Soree,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, the Terry search principle was regarded, and the limit to which it was supposed to be conducted was reviewed, Terry vs. Ohio case. The court further went into other cases that had resolved issues on the fourth amendment and the Terry search (Minnesota v Dickerson, 1993). Indeed, in Michigan vs. Long, the Court held that in the context of that case, a Terry search allowed the search of the individual and passenger’s compartments of the automobile to ascertain beyond doubt that the defendant was not armed and dangerous. In limited cases, the Court held that when contraband is retrieved, then the officer cannot ignore the contraband as the Fourth Amendment does not suppress it under those circumstances. However, the court in Long had ruled that if police lacked probable cause in believing that the object in plain view was contraband then conducting a further search to make the object apparent would make the plain view doctrine unwarranted with the seizure of the contraband.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “United States v. Leon”(1984), is one of the major Supreme Court Cases in American history. It all started in Burbank, California when police officers became very suspicious on a well-known drug dealer Albert Leon. A search warrant was being used to search Leon’s home for any kind of evidence for drug trafficking. The police gathered as much evidence and investigation that could be found in drug trafficking. They had found a large amount of “illegal drugs” in the residence of Leon’s home.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Wolf v Colorado case questions the fourth amendment. The argument was about whether it was against and illegal for the police to search and seizure Wolf’s medical office and obtain daybooks without any warrant. The reason for the unauthorized raid was because a women had called 911 about having medical complications after having had an illegal abortion. She named Wolf as the doctor who performed the procedure and arrested him under the conspiracy to perform an abortion. The information contained in the daybook led to police interrogated other women who had illegal abortions and admitted Dr. Wolf was the one who performed them.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Da Vs Harris Case Study

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Florida v. Harris & Florida v. Jardines, both are related to the fourth amendment. Although, citizens have right to be secure against unreasonable search. The reliability of dogs to sniff was questioned in court of law. Also 4th amendment was questioned in these cases.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets. Once he was arrested, officers searched his office without a warrant and found evidence of what he was being suspected of. They also searched Weeks home without a warrant, but found no evidence.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mapp Vs Ohio Case

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Over the past decades of our country we have come up with a constitution that contains the bill of rights that protects our rights as peoples. The very first amendment that we are giving is the right to freedom of speech, press, assembly, religion, and petition. One of the events that helped it get ratified is Texas vs. Johnson case. It helped us realize that people do have the right to express himself even if others don't like how they are doing it. The fourth amendment protects are right to having no illegal searches or seizures.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States v. Leon case, the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not be applied so as to bar the use in the prosecution's case in chief of evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid. Pp. 905-925. (United States v. Leon, (1984) No. 82- 1771.)…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This ruling prevents government officials from the continuance of unlawfully obtaining evidence and reinforces the Fourth Amendment. It took a liberal court to strike down what was bad law and apply the extension of the Fourth Amendment protection not to property, but to…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McKayla Magdaleno Mr.Young P.3 10/05/15 Bill of Rights Essay Hook: It’s 1798 and you’re helping construct and write the Bill of Rights, it’s super hot outside and you really just want to go home because you are only on the making of the 4th Amendment right as you get up to leave you get a brilliant idea on what the 4th Amendment should be. Statement: The first amendment reads “The right of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly, describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although culprits have been caught without a search warrant, the Fourth Amendment has been mistreated by not needing a search warrant to be searched, keeping social media history, and being detected through surveillance camera without approval. As President Obama described the society as “not fully protected”, and “not having hundred percent security” at the same time. The government has taken advantage of the Fourth Amendment, they also have taken benefit of civilian rights.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The 4th amendment is utilized with respect when it defends an arrest that may have saved a life. It seems to justify law enforcements rights to stop and frisk a citizen that actually may have been a criminal. In every state in every different situation the 4th amendment is used properly or according to what is considered right at the time. In the case of the PATRIOT Act, the situation in which it was establish was partially necessary, but never at the expense of personally comfort.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays