Utilitarianism Essay

Improved Essays
B1. What do you see as the most damaging objection to Utilitarianism? Do you think Utilitarianism can survive it?
Utilitarianism is an effort to provide an answer to the ethical question: “What should a man to do?” How should he act to others? Its answer is that he ought to do good or not do bad. Happiness is obtained from the feeling of doing good to others. But why then are so many altruistic people so miserably depressed? Let's take Mother Theresa for example. She dedicate her life's work to do good to others, yet she suffered miserably from depression. Why? Because Utilitarianism conflicts with our innate ego - a desire to to what is good for the self before doing what is good for others. Mother Theresa had human wants and desires that she repressed because of a pathological drive and belief that she MUST always do what is best for another and both herself. And this conflict between unregulated altruism and ego brings about self misery. And doesn't self misery conflict with the philosophy of Utilitarianism? C1.
…show more content…
According to Kant, when are we truly acting freely? Explain how his answer to this question influences his ethical stance.
Utilitarist, Immanuel Kant believed that there is no justification for lying and that our moral fiber depends on this. If we were ever to lie under any circumstance we were giving up our free will and “intrinsic worth”. Kant believes that humans are rational beings that can make free choices. By lying you are giving up your free choice and taking free choice away from the recipient of the lie. The right or wrong of the situation under any circumstances does not warrant lying.
If a patient knew that they had six months to live but when asked by their child if they are okay and the parent responds that they are fine to spare the torturous next six months of pain for the child, this according to Kant would be immoral. Kant does not balance the benefits or harms of the circumstance, a lie is a lie is a lie. The parent gave up her free will and the child was not able to prepare properly for the parents demise. There will always be an argument whether a lie can be justifiable or not and although I would like to consider myself a God fearing honest person I believe it is only human to lie, whether to protect yourself or those around you. Lying for the benefit of yourself and not others of course would in anyone’s eyes, utilitarian or deontological, be unethical. For example, if a rapist came to my door and asks if my kid is home, I will kindly answer; “No their not”. According to Kant this may cause the rapist to rape someone else and I would have took the rapist free choice away because I lied. Oh well. F1. According to Social Contract Theory, why should you be moral? Describe the conditions that make for a legitimate social contract. A social contract theory essentially states that the governed should give up some of their freedoms in order for protection from the government. Now the social contract theory is a simple idea but when put into action there are numerous parts that all have to be working properly. It requires the people to be willing to abandon some freedoms for the protection from government but the government

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The doctrine focuses on the consequences of actions as they aim to increase the happiness of the whole. Peter Singer goes on to apply the utilitarian doctrine to assert that people have an obligation to alleviate distant human suffering. Overall, utilitarianism highlights the importance of putting the happiness of others before your own. One may argue that utilitarianism cannot be applied to society because humans are inherently self-interested. However, utilitarianism can still be applied if all people see each other as equals, and recognize that everyone’s happiness is equally…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bioethics Essay Utilitarian Theory reflects consequentialism which is “a label affixed to theories holding that actions are right or wrong to balance of their good and bad consequences” (354). The general meaning for utilitarian is, the greatest good for the greatest number. In other words, “The right act in any circumstance is the act that produces the best overall result as determined by the theory’s account of value” (354). What matters is that you are getting the most out of your action.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics Of Care Essay

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Humans thrive on the ability to make choices and have options. Choices allow for the greatest individuals benefit and ensures that we survive by making the best decisions for our well-being. Modern society has evolved in a way where we are no longer in constant danger for our lives, but instead, are looking for ways to thrive. Utilitarianism is a well-known moral theory that bases itself on the universal principle of utility which is described as “always acting in ways that maximize happiness and minimizing harm for the aggregate”. A theory such as Utilitarianism is very attractive and makes moral sense intuitively.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his second argument, Kant is tempted to create exceptions to the rule against lying because in some instances, the consequences of not lying will be bad and the…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Among the three ethical theories studied in class, the utilitarian theory can be used in explaining ethical implications of Face Recognition technology. Chonko, Larry (1-5) describes various ethical theories. However, Chonko Larry (2) asserts that utilitarian ethical theory is based on the ability of an individual to predict the significance of an action. Action in this case study is using Facial Recognition technology in iPhone X. According to the theory, an option which results in the greatest benefit to most individuals is the one who is ethically right and correct.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Regarding Moral Reasoning and Privacy Rights Utilitarianism is essentially a doctrine within the study of ethics that focuses on the pleasures and pains of an individual in regard to their actions being beneficial to a majority. The principle question the doctrine seeks to answer is, “What ought a man to do?”, with the outcome being his actions provide the best results possible. As a branch of consequentialism (which, on a wider scale, focuses on an action’s outcome being determined by its consequences), utilitarianism is focused on a measure of pains and pleasures which maximize net utility for all people conclusively affected. While there are some cases in which the best available option doesn’t maximize pleasure or pain,…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the course, Evil Versus Good I learned how to think outside the box and look at the big picture of elements in life. The topic that I felt was the most interesting to write about is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is “something moral, or good, when it produces the greatest of good for the greatest number of people” (What is Utilitarianism?). It is a theory of normative ethics that ask whether a specific action is good or bad, moral or immoral.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To demonstrate how Kant’s notion of freedom is related to his view of the Moral Law I will outline…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper will discuss an ethical evaluation using Kantian’s theory in a lying case stated below. What is Kantian’s theory? Kantian’s theory is an ethical theory that relies on the moral goodness of all people. “Kant argued that there is an unconditional good related to rationality, the moral law, and moral duty. The theory is centered on the duty to act based upon respect for the moral law or legitimate moral rules (104).”…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before I discuss how utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics would respond to what took place, I am first going to briefly describe the situation. “While most of the population slept during the night of December 3, 1984, a toxic cloud of over forty tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas escaped from the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal, central India. Heavier than air, the gas blanketed the slums surrounding the facility and spread over the city of 800,000 people. At least 2,000 died immediately, although local estimates run into the tens of thousands.” (Ethics and Business: An Introduction, Kevin Gibson, 2007, page 1)…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays