Through Chris McCandless’s life and the teachings and writings of Thoreau, readers come to understand the philosophy of Transcendentalism. Transcendentalism is formed on the belief that human beings have self wisdom. It also deals with the betterment of self. Nature also plays a big part of this as well. The Transcendental beliefs that Chris McCandless follows under the teachings of Thoreau are self- wisdom, freewill, and individualism.…
In chapter 5 of The Scholar Denied, they discuss Social Darwinism. This is an idea that was developed around the end of the 19th century. The book says “social darwinism sociologists argued that a hierarchy of races existed with superior races at the top, less superior ones in an intermediate position, and inferior ones locked at the bottom” (Morris: 115). This hierarchy cannot be altered and only through natural selection, the most desirable and superior of the races would survive. Park accepted the theory of social darwinism and according to him, white Europeans were on top and blacks were on the bottom.…
William Clifford was an English philosopher and mathematician who lived from 1845 to 1879. He is best known for his revolutionary algebraic, mathematical physics, and geometry, but was also a well renowned philosopher with many published work, to include: The Ethics of Belief. He believed it was unethical for people to believe something without the proper evidence. The fact that we believe what our surroundings dictate, and how our society influences our beliefs, was his argument.…
Clifford’s evidentialist argument has lingered for a long time but in writing this essay I hope to prove that non evidentialist philosophers had it right. First I would like to look at Clifford’s argument in support of evidentialist.in his essay “The Ethics of Beliefs”. In the essay he states that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. ”[1]…
Never have humans had such abundance of information, easily accessible at the touch of a finger. Philosophers, doctors and scientists throughout history have labored their entire lives to study the science of earth, space and life on our planet. Now, with the amazing technological advances we’ve experienced in the last several decades, so many monumental discoveries have shed light on these fields, answering many questions and creating many more. The question now facing many of us in our quest for knowledge is what information is credible. What makes for “good science”?…
Helen Longino is a feminist epistemologist who argues that in order to reduce the chance of having subjective beliefs and have more objective knowledge, we must expand our epistemic communities. I think that Longino’s solution is more palatable than either foundationalism or coherentism. An epistemic community is the community that we hold our beliefs in. By expanding that community, there are more inputs on certain beliefs.…
From its own study the main accepted argument against naturalized epistemology, as proven by the mathematician Kurt Godel, is that systems built on empirical consistencies are subject to incompleteness, but that does not prevent their usefulness (Churchland 2002). This can be countered by example of that even though Newtonian physics has been supplanted by Einsteinian physics the former is still valid enough to send satellites into space but not for GPS data…
Looking back on the modernization’s progress that we have in course of time, we can say that science is an essential element and have played a major role in building an advanced civilization as it is nowadays. Nowadays, we can see that lot of invention and scientific finding that are beneficial towards society. Of course, all the findings and invention are compiled through a scientific paper as a proof and compilation for the future generation’s references. The content of the successful research and founding had been presented for public review and engagement. An excellent writing from Jeanne Fahnestock in Accommodating Science:…
In Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief,” Clifford argues the immorality of believing without sufficient evidence. In most situations, Clifford’s point of view would be practical; if we wish to be true seekers of the truth, it would be unethical to ever believe in something without sufficient evidence. This is a valid statement, but there are exceptions to this idea which are dependent on the situation. When it comes to the type of evidence presented, a belief can be justified or found to be wrong. Clifford sets two questions we are to ask ourselves when it comes to believing things that aren’t proven with physical evidence, rather shown by testimony.…
In the reading of “the Ethics of Belief” by W.T Clifford, Clifford stated what we believe is not a private matter. Clifford explained that beliefs and ideas are handed down from one generation to another and that if one person has not done his best, the faulty beliefs can be ineffective and corrupt our system which we depend on. The comments are interesting and gives me the impression that Clifford was trying to say that beliefs are property of our society and do not belong to just one person. Clifford is just saying that these false beliefs can be harmful to people who believe without seeking evidence.…
In “The Ethics of Belief,”W. K. Clifford argues that a credulous person is harming society by being credulous. Clifford provided two stories to explain his argument. the first story talks about a ship owner that has an old ship that has full of immigrants to be sent to sea and he believed that his ship was stable to be at sea but it wasn't and the ship sank with the people in it. The second story talks about an island where a religious group accusing children of wresting the laws of their country so they can remove the children from the care of their natural and legal guardians and even taking them away and keeping them concealed from their friends and relations.…
You can look around and find things that are there; a pencil, a wall, a tree. You can find things that you don’t even see; air, space, feelings. These are all things that are considered under the umbrella term of “science”. It takes specialists and fields under the term “science” to even begin to understand any of these things, as each is equally complex. These people…
1.0 Introduction “Well, dreams, they feel real while we’re in them, right? It’s only when we wake up then we realize that something was actually strange” (McCateer, 2010). Inception is a science-fiction movie, which was produced and directed by Christopher Nolan in 2010. ‘Inception’ as a concept refers to the situation when you plant an idea in someone’s mind without his or her knowledge of it happening (Rivera, 2012). The movie explores the ability to differentiate dreams from reality (Malcolm, 2010) and therefore looks at two branches of philosophy - metaphysics, and epistemology.…
Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…
As time passes, knowledge becomes more complex and philosophers start to develop different theories regarding how people come about this knowledge. There is a distinct difference between both Rationalism and Empiricism and both Descartes and Locke have found ways to discredit and support both views. Descartes argument towards Rationalism is much stronger than Hume's argument towards Empiricism. There is quite the distinction between both empiricism and rationalism. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their knowledge basis.…