USAti-Trust Laws To Promote Fair Competition

Improved Essays
“U.S. Anti-trust regulations are a collection of state and federal laws that regulate conduct & organization of corporations to promote fair competition for benefit of consumers.” The US has 3 major laws concerning anti-trust regulations: The Sherman Anti-Trust Act, The Clayton Act, and The Federal Trade Commission Act. The US is “…world’s top cops on the antitrust beat.” The US has been a model for other countries to also implement anti-trust laws and they have such laws in place to create a free market place that creates aggressive competition between sellers that give the consumer low prices with for good products. The United States has been the leader in Antitrust regulations, since the late 1800s, has it adopted these laws to keep the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Robber Baron was a term applied to businessmen who engaged in unethical practices and hogged most of the wealth for themselves. In the public mind, Robber Barons were often associated with political corruption. These people/corporations promoted Laissez Faire capitalism, which meant no government regulation of business. This would mean that they could exploit workers, engage in shady stock trading practices, and form monopolies. Since the public did not support this, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act was passed in 1890.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Yes, the law established by congress (AAA) gives them the right to establish commerce regulations. 3. Congress has the authority to regulate interstate interaction, which includes the ability to regulate the entire product price and all of the ongoing activities that affect that price.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A recent United States Supreme Court decision may mean that Kansas state boards may be vulnerable to antitrust lawsuits unless Kansas takes action to protect these boards. In North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Supreme Court held that state boards controlled by active market participants could be liable under Federal antitrust law. Antitrust laws are designed to prevent parties from limiting competition or trade in the market. Prior to the decision, many scholars and legal experts believed that state boards were immune from antitrust lawsuits, and so the Court’s decision represents a dramatic shift in antitrust law. This decision has the potential to have a massive impact on state boards in Kansas and may require serious action by the Kansas government.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jeffrey Greiner Professor Joshua Ballinger Expository Writing Section RL 1 November 2017 The Price of Inequality Since the founding of America it has been the elite that controlled the mass populations. It is royalty that funded the pilgrims’ voyage to the new land. It is royalty that attempted to make the United States of America a place with limited freedom.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I firmly believe that we should do something to redistribute the wealth'y money, however, I don't think a bill would pass anytime soon. Most likely, as the government is mostly run by companies, Congress would be paid off to dismiss the bill or delay it. Even though the Sherman Anti-trust act was implemented to prevent monopolies form forming, it is currently being unenforced. It would be more efficient to tax or regulated the richs' source of money, then they themselves.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    San Jose sued Major League Baseball for violation of antitrust laws, but lost thanks to MLB’s exemption from the Sherman Antitrust Act. This is just one of many instances in which MLB used its power as a Monopoly without fear of violating antitrust acts to control market…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Outline Brandy Noell BUS 311: Business Law I Instructor Brian Lahargoue September 19, 2016 I. Introduction 1. Acme Fireworks sells kinds of fireworks that include but are not limited to single-use and aerial display ground show. If an individual can think of it, Acme Fireworks can supply it. Acme Fireworks is a sole proprietorship that started out in a smal garageand is now looking to change its entity status. They are looking change because of the recent influx of larger business contract requests that will create a larger employee base, causing more liability risk, and higher demand for what some may deam either dangerous or even a hazzardous product which in turn will prompt evaluation of insurance coverage and…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, in 1890, congress passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to outlaw monopolistic business practices. Despite a near unanimous vote in both chambers, the act “proved difficult to enforce and was soon weakened by the Supreme Court” (Henretta 603). Next, congress passed the Clayton Anti-Trust Act in 1914. This legislation significantly expanded the government 's role in regulating business by prohibiting mergers and acquisitions if the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly” XXX(15 U.S. Code § 18).…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federal Trade Commission is an independent agency of the United States government founded in 1914 by the Federal Trade Commission Act. The mission it possesses is the promotion of consumer protection and eliminate the antibusiness practices, such as a monopoly. Under the Act, they are to prevent unfair methods of competition. They also help seek monetary redress and other relief for conduct to consumers and international government agencies. The settlement had resolved a lawsuit that MIC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making all automated calls to cellphones and calling people who are registered on the National Do Not Call Registry, which caused lawsuits people did not want to get involved with.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The congressional authority over commerce has been defined in the Court as having three broad categories, allowing for Congress to 1) regulate channel use for interstate commerce; 2) regulate and protect instrumentalities of interstate commerce even when the main threat stems from intrastate commerce; and 3) regulate activities which hold a substantial relation to interstate commerce (U.S. v. Lopez, 457R). It should be noted that the Court has determined commerce to be “…the commercial intercourse between nations, and parts of nations, in all its branches, and is regulated by prescribing rules for carrying on that intercourse” (Gibbons v. Ogden, 396R) and for which goods or services are exchanged. The functioning of commerce, including its…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Conrail Case Study

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ACQUISITION OF CONRAIL(B) ASSIGNMENT Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructuring Submitted To Professor Vishwanath SR Submitted By Amit Prasad Swathi Nivarthi 1. Why did Norfolk Southern make a hostile bid for Conrail? Ans: The most prominent reason for Norfolk to make a hostile bid was to continue its existence.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the foundation of the United States in the eighteenth century, Americans have always been rather capitalistic. Whether the business is a small, family-owned store on the corner or a large corporation that has millions of dollars to spend, all businesses of any kind compete with one another. Competition for success in business has never been greater. In recent years, large corporations have become a serious issue due to their extreme greed. This has hurt small businesses across the country, and now, the quantity of small businesses is on the decline.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only did Roosevelt advocate the ‘square deal,’ but he was known as the ‘trust-buster’. Trusts were the merging of big companies, monopolies, to control the marketing of certain products. In 1890, he upheld the Sherman Anti-trust Act, passed by Harrison, which made trusts/ monopolies illegal. However, it was initially misused against unions.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In which the Ohio Supreme Court reckoned his company to violate Ohio’s monopoly laws in 1890. Furthermore, he was convicted again nine years later by the U.S. Supreme Court for violating the anti-trust laws when he organized the Standard Oil Trust. A trust is a legal agreement between the firms in the business, which often result in the decline of competitions. However, in creating a monopoly for his company, Rockefeller was able to reduce the price of oil to his consumers. Additionally, his goal to rationalize the chaotic oil industry was achieved when only one company was available.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Business Law Case Study

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On 10/10/2015, at approximately 0243 hours, your affiant was on routine patrol in a marked patrol vehicle. Your affiant observed a red Ford pick-up truck travelling west in the 700 block of West Centre street (State Route 54). The truck had numerous cracks throughout the entire length of the windshield impairing the operator's visibility. The truck turned right into the parking lot of Boyer's Market. The operator stopped the truck next to vacant parking stales and was blocking the travel lane.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays