for Plato himself they are not part of an attempt to develop a comprehensive cognitive theory; rather they are floated hypothetically, in the context of arguments designed to highlight the unreliability of memory and perception as sources of true knowledge. All are imperfect, and thereby misleading, copies of material things, which are themselves, of course, merely imperfect instantiations of the eternal forms, the proper objects of philosophic …show more content…
Unlike the processing of computers, human mind is complex and the lots of processing can lead to errors. A more visual way is to compare the act of remembering with the way a computer processes information. When a program runs again, the “memory” is perfect. Argues memory isn 't retrieval but reconstruction. “Modern computers encode memory as a vast array of independent, digital bits of information that are “randomly accessible.” Functionally, this means that your computer can bring up your best friend’s phone number without accessing any information about what your best friend looks like or how you met. The human brain stores memory in a very different way; recalling your best friend’s phone number may very well bring to mind your friend’s face, a pleasant conversation that you had, and the title of the movie that the two of you are going to see. While computer memories are discrete and informationally simple, human memories are tangled together and informationally complex.” In comparison to the reading of computer code which is linear and not subject to unpredictability - with certain memories can bring with it greater