Transcendentalism In Ralph Waldo Emerson And Thoreau's Self-Reliance

Improved Essays
Transcendentalism In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Self-Reliance”, he expresses that one should never conform but instead follow one’s own mind. He wrote this while he helped start the Transcendentalist movement. In Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience”, he explains that it is okay to disobey the rule of law if it is unjust. This is written in response to the questions he was ask on why he went to jail. Both of these works were published around the same time. “Self-Reliance” was published in 1841. “Civil Disobedience” was published in 1849. These two essays can be compared through the objectives, writings, and social implications. To begin, the objective of both works are similar because they stress individualism. The purpose of “Self-Reliance” is to show that a person needs to find his own truth. Emerson wants to give the reader a better understanding of why it 's important to follow your own heart (Valdosta). He states, “Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string”, because he wants to persuade the reader to rely on oneself (2). In addition, the purpose of “Civil Disobedience” is to convince people to do what they believe is right and not to follow the law. Thoreau argues that there is a higher divine law, and that when those human-made laws conflict, one must obey the higher law (“Civil Disobedience”). Thoreau criticizes the American government when he states, “This American government—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity?”. Next, the writings are comparable because they have the same philosophical ideas. Emerson states that all men “must accept in the highest mind the same transcendent destiny, and not be pinched in a corner”, to inspire the readers to be a leader instead of a follower (2). He does not want anyone to ever underestimate what one is capable of. Emerson declares, “none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried”, to express that one person should not be limited by what others think they can or cannot do (2). Emerson states, “…you think good days are preparing for you. Do not believe it. Nothing can bring …show more content…
The two thinkers speak about what changes and reforms need to be made in society. According to Emerson, people are almost always willing to conform to society, and he states that “self-reliance is its aversion” (3). He tries to show the readers that they must be willing to speak the truth without being afraid of what others will say (Valdosta). Emerson says that to be a conformist in this world will get you nowhere and that “imitation is suicide” (2). Thoreau argues that each individual should declare independence from unjust laws, and that “it is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right”. He thought citizens should never give up their conscience to the law. He states, “that government is best which governs not at all” meaning he does not agree with a government that takes part in a person’s life (Thoreau). He did not believe government played any kind of important role in society. The government tries to constantly control every aspect of everyone’s life, but it should allow its people to decide major issues. These essays inspired civil war advocates, abolitionists, and war protesters after they were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. was famous for being a civil rights activist. This led him to write his famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” King’s letter responded to an article published by white clergymen who criticized King’s actions toward gaining equal rights for blacks. King’s letter presented his message through pathos and anaphora. Henry Thoreau, another great writer, does not speak towards civil rights, but on the topic of the government.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the fact that an improved perspective of "Letter from Birmingham Jail," many read the report principally as a safeguard of the idea of common noncompliance. This approach is absolutely justifiable, considering that Dr. Ruler expands on his idea of the idea in the "Letter." The fundamental commence of common rebellion is that an individual has the duty to challenge the laws of the state when the human law negates certain prevalent standards. Masterminds like Socrates (c. 470-299 B.C.E.), St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), and John Locke (1632-1704) all investigated the relationship between the individual and the state. What developed when of Locke and the Enlightenment was the possibility that the universe had "regular laws" that may frequently come in strife with man-made laws.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both great literary figures in the United States, yet they lived in different time periods. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and King’s Letter to Birmingham Jail”are quite similar, in addition obtain certain differences between the texts. Both writers demonstrate each other 's audience on ways of being civilly disobedient towards their corrupt government and how to have a relationship with them. On the other hand, certain differences, both texts possess are whom it was addressed to as well as the occasions and appeal. Both texts fractions in similarities and differences through their analysis, such as occasion, strategies used, and other figures used in their writings.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wood insist the essay was a narrative and dramatic essay which caused critics to think his work was out of proportion and uninteresting. Wood thinks his focus and accomplish was too dramatic and narrative form, yet his work lacked the message to his essay on being a truly self-reliant man. Wood and other critics expected to read and get the message with more supporting details on civil disobedience rather than his experience and thoughts. Thoreau offered encouragement to the individual’s rights, to withdraw any support from a government whose policies are evil. He was such a moral thinker, did not fear possible consequences of civil disobedience against injustice.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right...” Asking the question arouses the curiosity of the audience, giving it a well timed pause before the question and the answer which can heighten its effect when Thoreau…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much like Paine, Thoreau would not be bullied into violating what he believed to be right. Thoreau was also vehemently against slavery, something else he wrote about in Civil Disobedience. “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them.” (1865) This could also be seen as a critique of society.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism is an idealistic approach to identity, nature, humanity, and divinity. The themes derived from Emerson and Thoreau center on this transcendental view of self-reliance and nature. In Thoreau’s Walden, he uses key points Emerson shows in Self-Reliance. The two men carry a great influential impact on society showing ideas of non-conformity, infancy, identity, the meaning of self-reliance, and an overall connection to nature. Emerson and Thoreau teach what purpose nature has to several aspects widely known in society.…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglass agrees with Emerson on the premise of civil disobedience. He argues that citizens are obliged to engage in civil disobedience if a law is unjust, and good democratic citizens should seek out the freedom that was naturally endowed to them by the laws of nature. In contrast of Emerson’s view, Douglass argues that regardless if a law personally implicates an individual, a good democratic citizen must engage in civil disobedience if a law is unjust. In his speech, Douglass cites the commitment of the founding fathers to exemplify the importance of civil disobedience against illegitimate laws. Douglass contends that, “they loved their country better than their own private interest…feeling themselves harshly and unjustly treated by their…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self-reliance is relying own one’s own self not others. Self-reliance creates freedom because once again an individual has the power to do as they please without difficulties. To help explain freedom Emerson writes “What I must do, is all that concerns me, not what the people think” because in comparison to Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” both authors are explaining how freedom allows the ability to create one’s own laws, worships, thoughts and doings (552). In both “Nature” and “Self-Reliance” Emerson uses freedom as an underlying theme in order to help persuade individuals to take his advice towards nature,…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual’s Moral Obligation to stand for what is Right In “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau asserts that government seldom shows itself sufficient and that it often derives its power from the majority; who are its subjects. Furthermore, Thoreau underscores that the state, just as corporates have no conscience, but through its citizens, can be viewed as conscientious or reckless. Consequently, it is up to the people to practice conscience when endeavoring into their activities.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Self-reliance is the only road to true freedom, and being one 's own person is the ultimate goal. Transcendentalism is the idea that in order to learn about God and the universe, one must go beyond everyday experience to a higher standing. The five core beliefs of transcendentalists are non-conformity, self-reliance, free thought, confidence and importance of nature. The essays Self-reliance and Walden are examples of self-reliance. Self-reliance was written by Ralph Waldo Emerson and he urges his readers to follow their individual will instead of conforming to others.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays