As its name implies, “On Exactitude in Science” addresses the depth at which science is willing to delve into the unknown by using the map encompassing the empire, and ultimately falling to ruins, as a metaphor to hyperreality masking and corrupting reality (Borges, “On Exactitude in Science.”). The chaotic and probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, the warping of spacetime theorized in relativity, etc.; Borges proposes that these abstract concepts are perverting the concept and perception of reality into a simulacrum. However, Borges tackles the issue of the enigmatic nature of modern science from a completely different perspective in “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius”, in which he primarily uses the philosophy of idealism and solipsism to portray the idea that it is impossible to prove the validity of modern scientific principles. By making Berkeley idealism and solipsism the primary logical conventions in Tlön, he alludes to the possibility that the reality of modern science, and science in general, exists as a derivation of cerebral phenomena. Borges states that, “This monism or complete idealism invalidates all science” (Borges, “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius.” 23), and alludes to this philosophy throughout the narration of Tlön. While both stories clearly show skepticism toward modern scientific principles, each story alludes to the possible invalidity of the theories by utilizing contrasting philosophical principles – the dangers of contorting reality in “On Exactitude in Science”, and reality being a completely idealistic anomaly in “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis
As its name implies, “On Exactitude in Science” addresses the depth at which science is willing to delve into the unknown by using the map encompassing the empire, and ultimately falling to ruins, as a metaphor to hyperreality masking and corrupting reality (Borges, “On Exactitude in Science.”). The chaotic and probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, the warping of spacetime theorized in relativity, etc.; Borges proposes that these abstract concepts are perverting the concept and perception of reality into a simulacrum. However, Borges tackles the issue of the enigmatic nature of modern science from a completely different perspective in “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius”, in which he primarily uses the philosophy of idealism and solipsism to portray the idea that it is impossible to prove the validity of modern scientific principles. By making Berkeley idealism and solipsism the primary logical conventions in Tlön, he alludes to the possibility that the reality of modern science, and science in general, exists as a derivation of cerebral phenomena. Borges states that, “This monism or complete idealism invalidates all science” (Borges, “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius.” 23), and alludes to this philosophy throughout the narration of Tlön. While both stories clearly show skepticism toward modern scientific principles, each story alludes to the possible invalidity of the theories by utilizing contrasting philosophical principles – the dangers of contorting reality in “On Exactitude in Science”, and reality being a completely idealistic anomaly in “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis