Thoreau And Martin Luther King Comparison

Improved Essays
It is in our human nature to fight for what we believe to be right, and we do so in different ways; Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. both were empowering men who had their similarities and differences; but what exactly? Henry David Thoreau was a man who took a stand by refusing to pay his poll tax, being imprisoned due to it, and writing books and essays, his most famous being, Walden: or Life in the Woods, which greatly encouraged people to live simpler, and On the Duty of Civil Disobedience , which presented his views on taxes, slavery, and the Mexican-American War. According to the “Glossary of Nonviolence” from The King Center, civil disobedience is “The act of openly disobeying an unjust immoral or unconstitutional law as …show more content…
In the writing "America: History of Our Nation" by James Davidson and Michael Stoff, the authors show how "Thoreau urged people to live simply...[and] Thoreau spent a night in jail for refusing to pay a tax that he felt supported slavery." In King’s case, in his famous 'I Have a Dream' speech, he vocalizes, "We cannot walk alone. And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn back...We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality." While they both encouraged all people, King did so in a way that made everyone come together in masses and face it together; for example, King held marches with hundreds of participants fighting for rights. Meanwhile, Thoreau took more stands alone and behind the pages rather than publicly. He also focused on living more simply, which King did not. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr had the same ideas, but displayed them in different ways; same goes for how they influenced many nations.
In conclusion, Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr made similar impacts, but in some ways that were unique from one another's. Both activists have a legacy for sharing their opinions on injustices publically but in different formats. They both fought for rights, but Thoreau also fought for simple living. Lastly, both men influenced many nations; but one did so in masses as a union in one place at the same time, while the other fought more individually. Both King and Thoreau made brilliant impacts in history with the help of one another, even if both of them never knew

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Birth of a Nation A dream, a fight for rights, and the simple desire to make a change. Martin Luther King Jr. and Susan B Anthony both wanted to change the world, in two different centuries, for two different reasons, and yet they both were remarkably successful. They both also helped changed the world as we know it today through the power of words.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience is a term that varies among different people. In the mind of Henry David Thoreau the definition of Civil Disobedience requires you to have at least three things. You must be able to identify an issue at hand. You must be willing to take action for that issue. You must be prepared to take responsibility for those actions.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two writers who had great impacts on their audiences were Henry Thoreau, an author and poet (as well as many other jobs he tried out), and Martin Luther King Jr., the famous civil rights activist. Although these men lived in entirely different time periods they had writings that had a similar message. Thoreau wrote an essay “Civil Disobedience” in which he discusses the flaws of government, inspired by his disgust with slavery and the Mexican-American War. King wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” as a response to white religious leaders who opposed King’s efforts for civil rights. Although these pieces both are both trying to convince the audience to go against something they stand for, they use very different methods to achieve their desired…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Martin Luther King and Simone De Beauvoir have few things in common; King being a prominent Baptist Minister and activist in the African American Civil Rights Movement and Beauvoir being an advocate for feministic philosophers and feminist theories. While it seems like they would come from opposite ends of any spectrum and lived overlapping lives in time, their biggest collective commonality was that they both were face with oppressions in their time. Simone du Beauvoir being faced with being a woman and wanting to achieve more than what was thought allowed for her at that time, or King, wanting white people to accept black as their equal, wanting equal rights for all colors. They were both a radical in their generation, but both wanted more…

    • 1503 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass differs from H. D. Thoreau in the sense that he doesn’t believe that all government is oppressive and manipulative. When it came to the issue of slavery, an injustice recognized by most, Douglass felt true in his convictions to do whatever possible to end such an inequality. He may have changed his opinion on the Constitution around 1851 once the issue of slavery became more of a prejudice than an oppressive institution centered around injustice towards people’s senses of equality and freedom. He clearly understood there to be a time for rebellion to the current system in place if everything isn’t reflective of the principles set out in the Declaration of Independence and the preamble of the Constitution. “It shall not avail that the Constitution and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Du Bois and Booker T. Washington both sought after African American rights despite different approaches to the issue. Throughout their lives, they went through many of their own struggles, both similar and different. They both ended up become successful activists, speakers, and even writers. Although many people had their personal preference of the two, one thing was for certain; they both carried a legacy that still remains…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In other words, the people should simply oppose the government for every unjust law it brings out; otherwise, it will take advantage of its weak people and will eventually usurp all power. King relates this ideology to the injustice towards the African American people. On behalf of himself and his people, King argues that it is necessary to fight for justice because “We (African Americans) have waited more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights” (King, 3). King adds, “When you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of ‘nobodiness’—then you will understand why we find it difficult to wait” (King, 3). King feels that his people cannot afford to wait any longer for their freedom because if they do, their revolt will not be practiced non-violently.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henry David Thoreau expresses his aim in writing his “Resistance to Civil Disobedience” was to advocate protesting the government in nonviolent mannerisms. He considers that not taking initiation and solely discuss abolishing evil, is comparable to inciting it. He encourages this by evoking that “All men recognize...the right to resist, the government , when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and endurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now.” (Thoreau).…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience and Letter from Birmingham Jail Two different men from two different time period made their writing a master piece against government brutality by using many literary devices in their writing to convey their message. Thoreau and King Jr. were famously known to be highly against the injustice of the American government legislative system, they tried to help and persuade people in their writing by incorporating a lot of literary devices. Their main writing goal is that “now is the right time for each man to do act on the injustice being done around him. As King stated, "Injustice anywhere, is a threat to justice everywhere"(King).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The balance between the law of the state and natural, or divine law is a topic that has been scrutinized for thousands of years. Antigone by Sophocles and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. share similar standpoints on the controversial matter that has baffled philosophers. Sophocles uses Antigone to assert his opinion, as she disobeys Creon’s law and buries her brother, Polyneices. Similarly, King structures his plan of nonviolent direct action and civil disobedience to curtail racial injustice and segregation. While there are many similarities, each text has several technicalities regarding civil disobedience that differ.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both men were put in jail for very different reasons. Thoreau was thrown in jail for crime that he believed was unjust. He didn't pay his poll tax. No matter how insignificant the law was, he thought the state was unjust for having the right to tax him.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much like Paine, Thoreau would not be bullied into violating what he believed to be right. Thoreau was also vehemently against slavery, something else he wrote about in Civil Disobedience. “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them.” (1865) This could also be seen as a critique of society.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism was a movement in mid-nineteenth century America that focused on an individual obtaining personal freedom from the constrictions of their surrounding society. Thus, it can be said that they pushed for social and political change to be achieved so that individualism would be prized over collectivism. Two writers, Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson, are at the frontline of these Transcendentalist views. These authors introduce a similar twist to the concept of personal freedom, claiming that a person can achieve it by encompassing oneself into nature.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference of Machiavelli and Thoreau’s view on governing comes from the fact that they both are taking opposite perspectives on the same issue. Both discuss harsh governing. Machiavelli views it as necessary, while Thoreau views it as unjust, however Machiavelli is writing as one who governs, while Thoreau is writing as one being governed. The difference in audience is the cause for the differences between Machiavelli and Thoreau’s understanding of morality, humanity, and efficiency.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays