Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

Improved Essays
Michael Scalera
Mrs. Sauter
World History/ Block G
12/6/14
Three Philosophes Throughout history up to present day, we witness many social contracts and forms of governments take shape, cause controversy, and influence many individuals and nations across the globe. A social contract can be described as an implicit agreement among members of society to cooperate for social benefits. There are many different forms of social contracts and governments; ranging from absolute monarchies to total democracies. Between 1651 and 1848 there were three influential philosophers who wrote ideal theories in term of social contracts: Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Karl Marx. While Hobbes, Locke, and Marx all have valid reasons to support their claims for what
…show more content…
is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men...” – Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651. In the above quotation, Hobbes illustrates his belief that there should only be one power, a single monarch and/or monarchy running the state and citizens. This individual or group of people should be granted the power over all of man and to have absolute political authority on all decisions. Hobbes’s contract influenced many leaders and nations to follow this contract as well as sparking ideas of new thinkers to come. However, Hobbes’s quote and contract does indeed not make sense for the world in which we live in today because it is based on the idea that people are unable to take care of themselves. In reality, throughout history people have proven that they are able to take care of themselves. In addition, Hobbes’s idea will not work because it requires that all people lose their natural liberties, which has shown through history results in rebellion, emigration, and ultimately causes chaos for the government. Compared to other philosopher, Hobbes’s contract provides us with an overall improper way in which to run a stable government and …show more content…
He states: “The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule.” – John Locke, The Second Treatise of Civil Government, 1690. It is clear that Locke was a strong advocate for both individual as well as government power. Locke believed that there should be a balance between government and the people’s natural liberties. Furthermore, Locke believes that people are reasonable and moral; and as such they should be granted their rights to life, liberty, and property. He also stresses a form of government very different from that of Hobbes and Marx because he argues that a government with limited power is an ideal form of government. In particular, Locke’s contract was the most useful because it has the best application for the world in which we live in today. Lastly, Locke’s idea of government makes perfect sense for the world we live in today because in most cases all individuals are granted their own natural rights. By giving people the power to vote, it puts a limit on government powers, thereby creating a limited monarchy, which is a main form of government seen all around the world

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Through the ages, man has struggled with such concepts as natural rights and the role of government infringing upon those rights. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke go into detail on this particular discussion, and in doing so bring up some contrasting ideas concerning human nature and "the social contract." What is the "social contract," some may ask. It is not so much a concrete principle or tangible piece of paper as an idea or a theory, introduced by Hobbes and Locke in such a way as the agreement that we make when we ask to be governed; or ask for governance. To further understand the social contract theory, you must start by analyzing how humans act towards one another in a completely class and structure free environment.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Essay

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes and Rousseau both look at the social contract in similar views as they each see Hobbes argues that political authority and obligation are based on the individual self-interests of members of society who are understood to be equal to one another, with no single individual invested with any essential authority to rule over the rest, while at the same time maintaining the conservative position that the sovereign must be ceded absolute authority if society is to survive. This is best seen in ADD QUOTE AND THEN ANALYZE IT REALLY SPECIFICALLY. Hobbes sees human nature as equivalent to the natural state and untainted. Hobbes clearly defines the social contract as granting full equality to all men and does not recognize any differences as…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believed prior to the social contract, man lived in the State of Nature. Man has a natural desire to live in order. Hobbes believed that the state of nature of man was to live in constant fear; “Perpetual state of fear, danger, violence and mayhem”. He believed all humans were egotistical, self-absorbed, and…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes- Without a government, men will become chaotic and will act in self interest. They will be nothing preventing them to kill, take over, or initiate war. Without a power that governs there is nothing that determine what is just or unjust. Jean-Jacques Rosseau- Man is born free, however enter into chains when in a society.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of Hobbes major works, The Leviathan, established the social contract theory. In The Leviathan, Hobbes assumes what life would be like without government. According to Hobbes, without government we would lack the things necessary to make life suitable and we would fear death. Therefore, to avoid these things we the people must agree to a social contract and create a civil society. In this social contract we are agreeing to give up rights in order to have the government’s protection.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This ‘inconvenience’ is much preferred as the “perpetual warre of every man against his neighbour, are much worse.” This brings about the emergence of the social contract, where there is either mutual agreement of free individuals under the state of nature to submit themselves to a sovereign or the fear of the power of an existing sovereign. Sovereignty must be unconditional but there is however a contradiction and lack of justification since Hobbes has put forth the argument that there is natural equality of power the state of nature. The ‘first mover’ will only be willing to forgo liberty if others are also willing to do likewise but since Hobbes claims that human beings are egoistic and mistrustful of one another, it is therefore not a rational and viable option under the state of nature.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Politics affect most of our everyday activities. This could be through the use of the enforcement of laws or to raising money through taxes to help pay for roads. The actions of the government, whether they are good or bad leave there mark on their society. The social contract theory attempts to explain why people give up certain freedoms and form different types of organized governments. Under the social contract theory, many people would give up rights that they held that they enjoyed under a State of Nature but ultimately gave some of the freedoms up to protect what is in their best interest.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sovereign’s power cannot be forfeited, yet can still be negated via revolution. Hobbes states that the parties of the social contract are man and sovereign. This paper will address the aforementioned points and pursue the weaknesses in Thomas Hobbes’s arguments. Hobbes states “the condition of man is a condition of war of everyone against everyone... every man has the right to everything, even to one…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was born on the 5th of April in 1588 in Wiltshire, England and died the 4th of December in 1679. We know little about his childhood, not even his mother’s name, but his father’s name was Thomas also and was a vicar of Charlton and Westport. He had a brother that was two years older named Edmund and a sister. He had an uncle, Francis Hobbes that was a wealthy merchant banker who took care of Thomas, his mother, and his two siblings after Thomas Sr. deserted the family. Thomas educated at Westport church and later went to a private school operated by Robert Latimer, a graduate of the University of Oxford.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Hobbes, the most direct form of justification for the exercise of power over others lies in man’s existence in the State of Nature. In this state, man is permitted to do what is necessary for his own survival. This implies an overarching right to anything and everything, including the use of one’s power to better himself (and resultingly worsen someone else) in an effort to survive. Under certain circumstances this right to everything, according to Hobbes, is relinquished to escape the State of Nature, which is the only way to establish peace and security. I will elaborate more on these concepts momentarily.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every man an enemy, at war, and unsafe—such is the state of nature, as described by Thomas Hobbes. Yet in his work, Leviathan, Hobbes argues that man is not doomed to this state. He can escape. To do so, every man makes a covenant with every other to transfer their rights to an almighty Leviathan, the sovereign of their newly founded commonwealth, with the expectation that the Leviathan’s combined strength will better preserve their lives. However, this expectation does not follow from Hobbes’ argument.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes' states that the mutual transferring of right, is that which men call contract (Pg. 120). In that contract he proposes an idea that can avoid the worst from happening, something that can guarantee no harm against people and the ability for people to be able to rely on one another to keep their agreements. The only thing that can assure those two things is a government or sovereignty that people will give authority to keep order and peace.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, was born on April 5, 1588 in England. Hobbes is known for his work on political philosophy (Wikipedia). Hobbes was born prematurely because his mother heard of an invasion that was coming from the Spanish Armada. Hobbes said “My mother gave birth to twins, myself and fear.” Hobbes does not remember much about his childhood and mother making very little known about them.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Essay

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Thomas Hobbes essay about Morality as Rational Advantage he discusses how his development of the social conflict theory helps emerge individuals to make a decision in a society where everyone can mutually agree. He talks into perspective of what life would be like without a government. For example in the text he states: Whatsoever is the object of any man’s appetite or desire, that is it, which he for his part calleth good: and the object of his hate and aversion, evil; and of his contempt, vile and inconsiderable. For these words of good, evil, and contemptible, are ever used with relation to the person that useth them: there being nothing simply and absolutely so; (Hobbes, 4) If there is no government or laws one’s human reason would comes into play to say what is right and what is wrong.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes believed that the social contract was a “compact between the subject to obey the sovereign” (Montmorency 53). The problem with Hobbes’ theory starts with his belief that all humans are inherently selfish. He believes that people only work for their best interests, however, he also says that they have the rational capacity to create the best means to the end they want (Friend). He argues that man would choose to give up all of their natural rights because they believe that it is their best option for self-preservation. The population, for the most part, would not be willing to give absolute power to one sovereign.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays