Criminology essay 1
Q2) critically examine up to three leading explanations for crime drop.
Crime drop has decreased in the past two centuries in UK and internationally. Crime drop often divides judgement. What was clear from previous examinations was that the contents of the category of crime, as defined by criminal law, varies over time and place. Crime can be amorphous in variety of acts, which had been defined as crimes at one point, which included printing a book, going into a market to buy goods for selling them at a higher price or serious offences, such as murder. So innumerable are the wrongdoings that have been defined as crimes by the criminal law. The diffusion of crime is unbalanced some procedures of crime has decreased …show more content…
Crime anticipation and tackling with criminal behaviour are duties of the police service, depending on the category of crime targeted by the police service that particular crime seems to decrease .The security in protecting goods, houses and cars have increased dramatically in the 20th century. Assembling it more challenging to be victims of crime by maintaining better security. There is an upsurge in prison population ‘2,400,000 prison population UK’ . Decrease in crime, meaning the criminal justice system has imprisoned most of the offenders that cannot further affect the criminal statistics, unless reoffended after a time era. Some criminalities are more difficult to measure, such as cybercrime. Proliferation in cybercrime increased by “24 % in 2014 UK” and “by a global average of 32%”. We will be reasoning many factors involved in crime drop in United Kingdom and the world, as many dynamics are involved in crime drop statistics. How do the police work to maintain regulation on societies UK and …show more content…
Condemning long-term explanations for international and national crime decreasing there is a continuing decrease in crime drop. As technology enhanced over the years our global security has enriched with more secure security. Examples of this is the percentage of car without immobilisers fell from “77% to 22% in 1991-2006”. The number of car theft have moderated from “half a billion to around 175.000 per year”. The improvement of vehicle security has improved dramatically making it more challenging to contravene vehicle laws and regulations. This leads to crime dropping, as security gets better with stronger locks and more technical car alarms, which maintain higher secured property by its proprietors. The people safeguarding their houses with house alarms for burglary theft reasons has led to people protecting their own goods with the use of security technology. The police maintain fairer working structure with the use of security technology. They can evidence guilty and not guilty in a more efficient fairer way with the use of security. Whereas before the involvement of the technology security it was more challenging to fight crime (the use of global security cameras are increasing). In the other hand as the security technology evolves so do the criminals, as we get security technology to fight crime and influence crime dropping, criminals also evolve in security and knowledge. Increase