Social psychologists organize their ideas and findings theories (integrated set of principles that explain and predict the observed events), explaining the facts (statements about what we observe accepted). The abstract theories and make predictions, and assumptions that allow us to test the theory, give us direction and allows the investigation of theories practicalities. A good theory summarizes many observations and allows clear predictions to confirm / modify the theory, make new explorations and suggest a practical application. A psychologist is a professional who has studied the conduct, behavior and mental processes of human beings. People expect a psychologist arrange all his personal problems, what they do, it is to guide customers so they can fix their problems, listen to them and motivate them. The person comes to consult widely with different demands and variables, such as finding a parental relationship, which demands the direction of your life or perhaps a confirmatory request in order to make their own decisions, expectations which the patient comes to the consultation are very diverse. …show more content…
We may find people with very negative expectations, derived both from past bad experiences, such as being forced or pushed into the process by a third party; and / or meet unrealistic expectations to the extent that the subject overestimate our capabilities as psychologists, delegating responsibility in the process
Generally when someone voluntarily and personally make the decision to see a psychologist, because it is going through a moment of distress or major concern, the subject makes a crisis, its defense Fail, fail him/her.
From a cognitive-behavioral perspective is known that to solve a problem you must modify certain behaviors, they in a very broad sense, considering each other 's thoughts, feelings and emotions. We observe people who think about others, influences and relates to them, so that this science is everyone. However, it faces mixed reviews; they say it is trivial because it confirms the obvious; they say it 's dangerous because their findings could be used to manipulate people. Regarding the first criticism, we can say that common sense makes everything seem more obvious after we know the facts. This phenomenon of this I already knew not only makes the findings of social science seem like common sense, but has harmful consequences, such …show more content…
Advanced correlational techniques may suggest the cause and effect statistically removing the influence of, for example, but extraneous variables associated. The advantage of correlational research is that it tends to happen in real situations, where we can consider factors such as race, gender and social status. Our fast generalizations are adaptive, but sometimes they are wrong. The common ways that people form or maintains false beliefs. Our preconceptions control our performances; our preconceptions guide how we perceive and interpret the information, influence social judgments, that is, we do not respond to the reality as it is, but the reality as we build on the mind. Therefore, our shared assumptions about the world can make contrary evidence seems favorable. Our beliefs can generate their own conclusions. Sometimes our intuitive beliefs lead us to act in ways that produce their apparent confirmation, so our beliefs about other prophecies can become