The Warren Court Era

Improved Essays
The Warren Court Between 1953 and 1969, the lives of many people in the United States changed drastically. This time was known as the Warren Court era, when Chief Justice Earl Warren was at the forefront of the most liberal court in American history. Without the monumental court decisions, American society would likely have taken on a much different shape than it has today. The Warren Court created a much more equal society through desegregation, separating the church and state, and expanding the rights guaranteed through the criminal justice system.
Tensions between people of different races in America have existed for centuries. Such tensions caused the segregation of schools for African Americans. Children didn’t have the same educational
…show more content…
It is utilized every day to ensure the safety of the country. The (somewhat) trusted process has been to thank for many persecutions ending with the correct verdict; in the ideal situation, only the guilty are punished. Before establishment of the Miranda rights, however, things were quite different. People who were completely innocent may not have had the opportunity to receive a fair and equal trial due to financial issues or a lack of knowledge regarding freedom of speech. “Along with other Warren Court decisions, Miranda has increased public awareness of constitutional rights,” and what law enforcement can and cannot do to determine suspects as guilty. (Richard A. Leo, “The Impact of ‘Miranda’ revisited”) It is important for accused persons to have knowledge of their rights, and to have proper representation. Otherwise, one wrong move and an innocent party might be facing jail time, or worse. Perhaps, someone belonging to a minority that may have been targeted by police wouldn’t have the means to access a lawyer or attorney. Equality before a court provides the opportunity for a much fairer trial for criminal charges and a much better chance for the truly guilty party to be brought to justice. Still today, the Miranda law stands steadfast at the helm of the American Criminal Justice System. In 2000, the Supreme Court “strongly reaffirmed its landmark Miranda decision, which requires police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to be represented by an attorney during interrogation.” (“Miranda warnings upheld, Supreme Court says right now deeply rooted”) Groups targeted by law enforcement would never see the light of day if it were not for the laws set in place demanding equal treatment within criminal handlings. American society changed drastically as a result of court decisions like Miranda v. Arizona; safety and equality became a reality for many people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In January of the following year Miranda’s lawyers submitted an argument saying his right to a counsel granted by the 6th amendment was violated by the phoenix police department. It was appealed to try the constitutionality of instances where the defendants were questioned “while in custody or otherwise deprived of freedom in any other significant way”. They argued that a uneducated man like Ernesto Miranda would not know his 5th amendment rights to not incriminate himself. They also argued that in Vignera. V. New York a petitioner made confessions to detectives without being informed about his rights to a attorney and council.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark case whose outcome established the protections of the Miranda rights that safeguard the suspect’s rights while in custody and preventing a violation of a person’s Fifth Amendment rights. This case was tied together from 4 other cases that were being tried on similar issues. The original case began after Ernesto Miranda kidnapped and raped Lois Ann Jameson, an 18 year old woman with the intelligence of a 13 year old. She identified Miranda’s car as a green car and for a few days nobody could find a lead.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His request to speak with his lawyer while being questioned by police was repeatedly denied. The Court held that the denial of Escobedo’s right to counsel contributed to his confession, making it invalid as evidence, emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights of individuals during police questioning (Doc 6). Similarly, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court established the famous “Miranda rights,” which require law enforcement officials to inform individuals of their constitutional rights before questioning them in police custody. This case involved Miranda, who confessed to a crime during police interrogation without being informed of his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. The Court ruled that Miranda’s confession was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and established the now-familiar Miranda warning to protect individuals’ rights during police interrogation (Doc 7).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Willis D. Hawley and Sonia Nieto Wrote an article “Another Inconvenient Truth: Race and Ethnicity Matter” that looks into the problem that race and ethnic backgrounds cause in modern life. They use 4 main writing strategies in their article; Take on the Big Concepts, Call Out the Quiet Argument, Break Down Your Reasons, and Support Your Reasons. Hawley and Nieto take on the big concept by stating that there are “shameful differences in the academic outcomes and graduation rates of students of color compared too many Asian and white students” (Hawley and Nieto 1). They also shed some light on conflict by stating, “Being more conscious of race and ethnicity is not discriminatory; it’s realistic” (Hawley and Nieto 1).…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, White Americans continued to earn the superior jobs because they were attending exceptional schools and getting a higher level of education. The most powerful thing in the world is knowledge and even though African-Americans were allowed to attend school now the majority went to schools that weren’t funded well. As a result, African-Americans continued to receive an inferior education. For this reason, the movement began to use the “separate but equal” principle on their side. “Segregation did lifelong damage to black children, undermining their self-esteem,” argued Thurgood Marshall.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Warren Court Influence

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Warren Court decisions and influence made a long lasting impact on american society that lasts to this day. The Warren Court, which was lead by Earl Warren, is widely known in to have been one of the most influential supreme courts within United States history.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren court was a time full of life changing events, whether they were good or bad they affected everyone. Changes were being made quite frequently to civil rights, judicial and federal powers. The Warren court was known for several different things such as: ending racial segregation, putting a stop to prayer in public schools, making the right to privacy very clear through the constitution, and much, much more. Without the Warren court, there is no say on how the United States would be right now. The background of the court is about as important as what happened during the years that it took place.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s scary to think that only 61 years ago, American schools were still racially segregated, and African American children were kept away from white children. Earlier in 1896, a Supreme Court case called Plessy v. Ferguson made segregation legal as long as the facilities were equal (McBride). In the middle of the twentieth century, many people were working together to challenge these segregation laws. A man named Oliver Brown was one of the many people who challenged segregation laws when he brought the Topeka, Kansas school board to court. Brown v. Board of Education took place in 1954, and surprisingly, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Brown.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brown Vs Education

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Segregation plays an enormous role in the history of America. During the nineteen fifties white American children had access to neighborhood schools, whereas black children had to travel several miles outside of their neighborhoods to go to school. In some instances, black children were ten minutes away from a nearby all white school, but had to travel an hour by car to go to an all-black school. This was happening before Brown v. Education was taken into effect, now known as a landmark in the education history of the United States. Until then, equal education for African American communities was in dire need of improvement compared to the education that white American children were receiving.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jade Scheib EDTHP: 115 Mr. Ulicny October 22, 2014 Desegregation of Schools One of the biggest educational breakthroughs was the desegregation of public education. At one point schools were segregated. Which meant they “restricted people to certain circumscribed areas of residence or to separate institutions and facilities on the basis of race or alleged race” (encyclopedia.) Segregation of schools, and other places caused a lot of trouble.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda rights are more than words, and have a big part in the world today which I am going to tell you about later on. Miranda Rights are important because they tell you what rights you have and if you have been accused of anything. People who are being questioned by the police should have their Miranda Rights read to them. I feel that Miranda Rights are important because they help to get out of trouble for something they did or did not do. Now days, it is important for the person being questioned to be told about their Miranda Rights.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nobody wants to subject innocent men to poor treatment, yet the ideas of rapists and murderers being treated like kings behind bars are nauseating at best. The three unalienable rights are also put into play here. The fifth and fourteenth amendments both guarantee that no citizen shall have life, liberty, or property taken from them, without the use of due process. So long as the court system has correctly convicted, those convicted of a crime have given up those rights. The Miranda rights are the rights named in the fifth amendment that protect criminals from self-incrimination as well as making them aware that a lawyer will be provided for them if they can’t afford one.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States abolished the Miranda Rights, a web of full of problems would be created for the United States because people who are not knowledgeable of what rights they have under interrogation would have a claim to freedom from a case they may have been charged guilty had the United States not abolished the Miranda Rights. As was the case of Miranda v Arizona, police may continue to abuse the interrogation system as they allegedly had before and cause the case to be thrown out. Even if people may believe that the Miranda Rights are universal knowledge, the recitation of rights to a person upon arrest gives protection to the fairness of the case because if the defendant confesses to their crime, a claim of lack of knowledge regarding their rights will no longer be usable. If the United States abolished the Miranda Rights, not only would there be more excuses regarding whether or not the defendants know their rights, but there would also be those who do not know their rights and would create many problems for the judicial system. Because having the Miranda Rights be a present factor in the court system does no harm as it is only reading the rights a person has to them upon arrest, they should remain present unless the United States would want more problems on their…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays