The Three Characteristics Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

Improved Essays
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, justice is the maintenance or administration of what is fair especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments. Justice is usually seen as actions of doing good works such as giving money to the poor and putting a criminal in prison for their wrong actions. In his book “The Republic”, Plato gives his beliefs on both the political and the individual form of justice, using the dialogues of Socrates. The political justice is where Plato’s ideal city is modeled after the four main virtues that include wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. The individual justice is based on the three characteristics within the soul of individuals and …show more content…
Plato’s view on an oligarchy is where people are divided between the poor and the rich, which causes instability in the social classes. In an oligarchy society, the only focus is to get wealth and fulfill all their private needs. Socrates describes the transition of oligarchy to democracy with Adeimantus, in which he says “And I suppose that democracy comes about when the poor are victorious, killing some of their opponents and expelling others, and giving the rest an equal share in ruling under the constitution, and for the most part assigning people to positions of role by lot” (Republic, VIII 557a). So Plato gives an example of how different social classes can be triggered by individual motivations. In an oligarchy and democracy, this causes problems for justice because there is a fight for equality. These constitutions lead to people in the laborers attempt to overthrow the rulers and the rich, for there to be equality for everyone. The meddling and exchange of social classes are seen in these constitutions, as well as people who have individual ambitions to have more money and such. This causes injustice because people are not doing the responsibilities within their social class and not abiding to their individual …show more content…
Plato’s concept is that the first three virtues of wisdom, courage, moderation will help in finding the last virtue, which is justice. In the argument between Socrates and Glaucon about the four required virtues in the ideal city, they talk about the process of the virtues to find justice. Socrates begins by stating the key virtues for the ideal city:
Socrates: Clearly then, it is wise, courageous, moderate, and just. Glaucon: Clearly. Socrates: Then, if we find any of these in it, what’s left over will be the ones we haven’t found? Glaucon: Of course. Socrates: Therefore, as with any other four things, if we were looking for any one of them in something and recognized it first, that would be enough for us, but if we recognized the other three first, this itself would be sufficient to enable us to recognize what we are looking for. Clearly it couldn’t be anything other than what’s left over. Glaucon: That’s right. (Republic, IV

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first point Socrates makes when creating the city is that…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Virtue Analysis

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Plato taught that every person should focus on the virtue that was most necessary for ones position in society. The most noble of virtues was justice to one’s self, or rather justice is to act in a manner that reflects what is inherent in one’s soul. True satisfaction, according to Plato, can be found in preforming the task to which you are most suited, wither it was what you wanted to-do or not. If every citizen were to place the needs of the state above one’s own happiness then as a collective the state and those in it would be conforming to an order that is the…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Republic, Plato makes the claim that “only philosophy can save us” (Book V, 573d). Thousands of years later, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote Democracy in America. Many scholars summarize his beliefs as, “only institutions can save us”, a direct repudiation of Plato. In this paper, I will show that, in fact, Plato’s philosophy is embedded in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, specifically revolving around the preference for community and collectivism rather than private gain.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates attaches virtue, good, and morality to justice in a way to make it seem like it is good for its own sake. The entire Republic is made to reason why justice is good for its own sake—that there is something intrinsically good about it. Within book I of the Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus have come to an agreement that there are certain virtues that allow things to work well for the better, a vice being the opposite and causing anything to make something preform for the worse. In the end of book I’s dialogue, both Socrates and Thrasymachus have some to agree that justice is allows a person to be more profitable and live well (Plato, 353c-354b). This is important in the foundation of the Republic.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    He will tell the citizens the gods assigned them to their class because they are best suited for that job. The rulers would have gold in them, the soldiers would have silver, and the craftsmen would have iron or bronze. It is, however, possible for them to move from one class to another. This is mentioned because Plato understands that it is possible, for example, for a craftsman’s son to have the abilities to become a soldier or vice versa. The last virtue is of course justice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once again, Socrates defenses justice with the aid of a hypothetical city and corresponds justice in city with…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His four virtues were wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. Wisdom had to deal with the intellect. In Plato’s eyes a wise person uses its mind to understand moral reality and after apply it to their daily life. Courage had to deal with how we face adversity. Moderation related to ut desires and self-control.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following paper will be discussing Plato's perspective on the philosopher-kings and what makes them the best rulers. I will use examples from the text Plato, Republic to describe Plato's ideal city which will demonstrate Plato's true definition of justice and why no city can be just unless it is ruled by a philosopher-king. Through explaining Plato's ideal city this will aid in concluding why Plato believes philosopher-kings are the best fit to rule in order to truly have a just society. In the text Plato, Republic Plato is discussing human behaviour, most prominently the trait of justice.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Republic, Plato discusses and relates the three topics that are central to one lives, education, justice, and happiness. Through his definitions of these three topics, he considers how a society can achieve the proper education, justice, and happiness leading to his understanding of human nature. Plato addresses the close relation between being just and happy to the education received in society. The relationship between education, justice, and happiness depends on Plato’s understanding of these topics. Specifically with the relations of justice and happiness, the relationship is just as much dependent on the true sense of the idea as it is with Socrates rejection of the false claims.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much of what is presented in the dialogue has arisen multiple debates among philosophers, psychologists, artists and even the average person. There are a few instances where I agreed with Plato’s beliefs as well as the opposite. One of the clearest concepts of his work is that the rulers of society must have no ulterior motive than to truly help their people and such types of power should not be associated with individual dominance and wealth. Another idea associated with this is that leaders should have true understanding. Though I do not believe all leaders must be philosophers that have attained enlightenment, they must display moral integrity to some extent.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays