As it says on Discovery.com, “The Catholic Church has never taken an official stance on the object's authenticity…” (Ghose). This shows us that is may not be real because the Catholic Church has never actually confirmed it. As the article goes on to say, “Suggested the shroud was made between A.D. 1260 and A.D. 1390, lending credence to the notion that it was an elaborate fake created in the Middle Ages.” (Ghose). This proves that the cloth could be fake. Lastly, the cloth didn’t exist in the Catholic Church until after Jesus’s death. “...the Catholic Church only officially recorded it’s existence in A.D. 1353…” (Discovery.com) (Zolfagharifard). This proves that Jesus Christ’s body is being
As it says on Discovery.com, “The Catholic Church has never taken an official stance on the object's authenticity…” (Ghose). This shows us that is may not be real because the Catholic Church has never actually confirmed it. As the article goes on to say, “Suggested the shroud was made between A.D. 1260 and A.D. 1390, lending credence to the notion that it was an elaborate fake created in the Middle Ages.” (Ghose). This proves that the cloth could be fake. Lastly, the cloth didn’t exist in the Catholic Church until after Jesus’s death. “...the Catholic Church only officially recorded it’s existence in A.D. 1353…” (Discovery.com) (Zolfagharifard). This proves that Jesus Christ’s body is being