The Ratification Referendum By Sanford Levinson

Improved Essays
The United States Constitution can be considered a very controversial topic in regards to our government. The Constitution is used to divide power between the federal government and the states. It is used also to protect the individual liberties of the American citizens. In the article The Ratification Referendum by Sanford Levinson, he discusses how the U.S constitution is flawed in many ways. He argues that Americans should have the opportunity to vote on whether congress should draft a new constitution . I believe that the American citizens should have the right to vote for a constitutional convention because over time we have seen changes within our economy, technology, population and military. The Constitution that was written hundreds of years ago cannot accurately address the complicated issues that our government faces today. I found myself agreeing with the views regarding the constitution being radically defective when it is being compared to today’s era. The framers of the Constitution themselves showed us that change is sometimes necessary. As Levinson states “they were, after all, a generation …show more content…
The founders that created the Constitution themselves knew it was time for a change when they created the Constitution. Not only that, but the Constitution is outdated when it comes to the complications in today’s society, and the founders knew that it would need changes in the future. I believe the core of the constitution has some crucial rhetoric that should not be changed; however, it should be updated to reflect the makeup of our current society. Each generation is responsible for thoughtfully deciding their own future while learning from previous generations. The whole idea of an amendment implies change. I agree with Levinson that the constitution shouldn’t be torn up and forgotten but just updated to more modern realistic standard of today’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Even Washington feels that a new constitution would be best. (Doc. F) The world sat and watched this new government forming in America, of course there were doubts from Europe but America, being the “teenager”, wanted to contradict their “Parent” nations and knew that if they worked hard enough they could prove the world wrong with their new Constitution that would last. The A. of C. was the item that caused Europe to doubt and for good reason too. Under its power our government could not even support itself because it lacked the power to tax without state consent. (Doc. C)…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the summer of 1787, the United States was challenged to create a stronger central government without letting one person or group have too much power. There were flaws in the Articles of Confederation and the government wasn’t getting anything done. The fifty-five representatives wanted to create a Constitution that divided up powers to avoid the tyranny that they escaped from by becoming an independent nation. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in many ways, such as Federalism, creating equality for big and small states, separation of powers by creation of branches, and checks and balance between the branches.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe the fact that there can even be amendments to the Constitution alone means that it is not a fixed document. If it can be changed over time due to flaws found within, then the interpretation of the document should also be able to change over…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sectional Compromise

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We must know why we needed a new constitution. It all started with The United States first form of government, The Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was adopted November 15, 1777 which was the countries first form of government. The Articles provided the power to the states instead of a strong central government. It may all…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sitting in the National Archives in Washington D.C. lives the most important document when it comes to our country and United States government. Professor Laurence H. Tribe and Michael C. Dorf are authors of the article “How Not to Read the Constitution”. Both have worked with the United States Supreme Court and teach Constitutional Law. Working together, these men have studied and have taken interest in the document that formed our country, the Constitution, trying to piece together a giant mystery, a puzzle that needs to be completed. This piece of paper was signed by a group of men filled with a want to forget the mistake of the Articles of Confederation, a gargantuan governmental mistake, wanting to start anew.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The current Constitution allows for an amendment to be passed with ⅔ votes from both chambers of Congress and also with ¾ of the state’s approval or with ⅔ of the state legislatures calling for a convention. Sabato’s view on calling a convention is interesting in that his interpretation of a state’s petition to call a Constitutional Convention never dies as well as the visual of a light on, light off policy. Proposed amendments that a state switches it’s light on for will remain on until they reach 34 states with their lights on or until the state shuts it’s light off. This visual allows for a Convention to be called the moment the 34th state light went on, meaning a Convention could be called promptly. The one area Sabato says needs to be addressed is the lack of a standardized way of submitting applications for an amendment or convention.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel Shay Rebellion

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The constitution itself was made for the people by the people. “ We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice…”. The whole goal of America in the beginning was to make the Union…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In James Madison’s Federalist 49, written in 1788, he lays out his argument for why constitutional revision should be limited. He believes that, in response to Thomas Jefferson’s idea of frequent revision that being every 19-20 years, that this recurrent change to the constitution would ultimately lead to the people’s intolerance of the government in the sense that they would begin to believe that it was defective and could not be fixed. In the eyes…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading the constitution, the constitution that the delegates crafted, should not be ratified. When the delegates of each state were in the process of creating the constitution, they forgot about the citizens…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I says that a constitutional convention can be called if: • There is a two-thirds vote of both houses of the state legislature to put a convention question on the ballot. • The majority of those voting affirmed the idea of having a convention. • Amendments or revisions proposed by a convention go to statewide vote of the people for…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The situation in question is the status of the Constitution 's life, or lack thereof. Is it a living document, or is it dead? That is, should it be interpreted differently, according to the times, or interpreted precisely as it was intended to be when written? This question is hotly debated throughout politics, as its answer can determine how crucial legal…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays